Efficacy of piracetam in children with breath-holding spells: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Indar Kumar Sharawat, Lesa Dawman, Pragnya Panda, Prateek Kumar Panda
{"title":"Efficacy of piracetam in children with breath-holding spells: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Indar Kumar Sharawat, Lesa Dawman, Pragnya Panda, Prateek Kumar Panda","doi":"10.1007/s00431-024-05926-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A number of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted comparing the efficacy of piracetam with placebo and other medications in children with breath-holding spells (BHS). However, no systematic review has yet collated all this evidence. All RCTs comparing the efficacy and/or safety of piracetam with placebo or other medications in children with BHS were included. The pooled estimates were compared for the number of participants with a favorable response, the change in monthly frequency of BHS, compliance, and adverse effects in both groups. The ROB 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and the GRADE system was used to determine the certainty of the collated evidence. We included 5 RCTs (437 participants) in the review. Piracetam group had significantly more participants with favorable responses at 1, 2 and 3 months after randomization, as compared to placebo group (RR: 6.5 (95% CI-1.8-23.2), I2 = 75%, p = 0.004, RR: 4.7 (95% CI-3.3-6.7), I2 = 49%, p < 0.0001, RR: 5.4 (95% CI-3.4-8.5), I2 = 0%, p < 0.0001 respectively). Number of participants with complete response or total cessation of attacks was more in the piracetam group compared to placebo (RR: 5.7 (95% CI-1.4-23.2), I2 = 88%, p = 0.01). Change in the average number of BHS was significantly more in the piracetam group, as compared to the placebo group (mean difference-4.9 (95% CI-0.7-9.0), I2 = 99%, p = 0.02). Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse effects were comparable in both piracetam and placebo groups (RR: 1.9 (95% CI-0.5-7.6), I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, p = 0.33). Conclusion: Oral piracetam is efficacious and safe in children with BHS, and its efficacy may further increase by co-administration of oral docosahexaenoic acid. What is known? • Breath-holding spells (BHS) are a common pediatric condition, affecting 0.1% to 4.6% of otherwise healthy children. • Several studies have investigated the efficacy of piracetam in reducing the frequency and severity of BHS, with mixed results. What is new? • Oral piracetam is efficacious and safe in children with BHS. • Its efficacy is further increased by co-administration of oral docosahexaenoic acid.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05926-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A number of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted comparing the efficacy of piracetam with placebo and other medications in children with breath-holding spells (BHS). However, no systematic review has yet collated all this evidence. All RCTs comparing the efficacy and/or safety of piracetam with placebo or other medications in children with BHS were included. The pooled estimates were compared for the number of participants with a favorable response, the change in monthly frequency of BHS, compliance, and adverse effects in both groups. The ROB 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and the GRADE system was used to determine the certainty of the collated evidence. We included 5 RCTs (437 participants) in the review. Piracetam group had significantly more participants with favorable responses at 1, 2 and 3 months after randomization, as compared to placebo group (RR: 6.5 (95% CI-1.8-23.2), I2 = 75%, p = 0.004, RR: 4.7 (95% CI-3.3-6.7), I2 = 49%, p < 0.0001, RR: 5.4 (95% CI-3.4-8.5), I2 = 0%, p < 0.0001 respectively). Number of participants with complete response or total cessation of attacks was more in the piracetam group compared to placebo (RR: 5.7 (95% CI-1.4-23.2), I2 = 88%, p = 0.01). Change in the average number of BHS was significantly more in the piracetam group, as compared to the placebo group (mean difference-4.9 (95% CI-0.7-9.0), I2 = 99%, p = 0.02). Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse effects were comparable in both piracetam and placebo groups (RR: 1.9 (95% CI-0.5-7.6), I2 = 0%, p = 0.33). Conclusion: Oral piracetam is efficacious and safe in children with BHS, and its efficacy may further increase by co-administration of oral docosahexaenoic acid. What is known? • Breath-holding spells (BHS) are a common pediatric condition, affecting 0.1% to 4.6% of otherwise healthy children. • Several studies have investigated the efficacy of piracetam in reducing the frequency and severity of BHS, with mixed results. What is new? • Oral piracetam is efficacious and safe in children with BHS. • Its efficacy is further increased by co-administration of oral docosahexaenoic acid.

已有许多随机对照试验(RCT)对憋气发作(BHS)儿童进行了吡拉西坦与安慰剂和其他药物疗效的比较。然而,目前还没有系统性综述对所有这些证据进行整理。所有比较吡拉西坦与安慰剂或其他药物对憋气症儿童的疗效和/或安全性的 RCT 均被纳入其中。比较了两组中获得良好反应的参与者人数、BHS 每月发生频率的变化、依从性和不良反应的汇总估计值。ROB 2.0 工具用于评估偏倚风险,GRADE 系统用于确定整理证据的确定性。我们共纳入了 5 项 RCT(437 名参与者)。与安慰剂组相比,吡拉西坦组在随机分组后1、2和3个月出现良好反应的人数明显较多(RR:6.5 (95% CI-1.8-23.2), I2 = 75%, p = 0.004, RR:4.7 (95% CI-3.3-6.7), I2 = 49%, p 2 = 0%, p = 0.33)。结论口服吡拉西坦对BHS患儿有效且安全,同时口服二十二碳六烯酸可进一步提高疗效。已知信息- 憋气症(BHS)是一种常见的儿科疾病,影响 0.1% 到 4.6% 的健康儿童。- 有几项研究调查了吡拉西坦在降低憋气症发生频率和严重程度方面的疗效,结果不一。有什么新发现?- 口服吡拉西坦对患有 BHS 的儿童有效且安全。- 同时口服二十二碳六烯酸可进一步提高疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信