Do antibiotics prior to dental extractions reduce adverse post-operative outcomes?

Q3 Dentistry
Darshini Ramasubbu, Jonathan Lewney
{"title":"Do antibiotics prior to dental extractions reduce adverse post-operative outcomes?","authors":"Darshini Ramasubbu, Jonathan Lewney","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01093-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate whether antibiotic prophylaxis reduced or increased post-operative complications following dental extractions.</p><p><strong>Sample selection: </strong>The cohort included 269,003 patients. In terms of participants, this sample consisted of Veteran Affairs Dental patients, who attended for a dental extraction between 01/01/2015- 31/12/2019. The intervention and comparator was whether or not patients had received an antibiotic prescription prior to their extraction, with the primary outcome a specified post-extraction complication (oral infection, dry socket or fever within 7 days of the extraction). Data was collected on patient demographics, medical history, and details regarding the extraction.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between antibiotic prescription prior to extraction and outcomes, alongside a sensitivity analysis that excluded antibiotics prescribed by a medical provider.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 269003 patients, who attended 385,880 dental visits. During 122,810 visits (31.8%), patients received antibiotics prior to extraction, with amoxicillin the most frequently prescribed. Antibiotics were more commonly prescribed in those who received a surgical extraction. In total, 3387 patients experienced a complication. Of these patients, 1272 had received antibiotics, compared with 2115 who had not. The regression analysis determined that diabetes was a statistically significant modifier of an association. For patients without diabetes, receiving antibiotics increased the odds of a post-extraction complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this sample of older people, there was no association between being prescribed antibiotics and post-extraction complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01093-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design: This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate whether antibiotic prophylaxis reduced or increased post-operative complications following dental extractions.

Sample selection: The cohort included 269,003 patients. In terms of participants, this sample consisted of Veteran Affairs Dental patients, who attended for a dental extraction between 01/01/2015- 31/12/2019. The intervention and comparator was whether or not patients had received an antibiotic prescription prior to their extraction, with the primary outcome a specified post-extraction complication (oral infection, dry socket or fever within 7 days of the extraction). Data was collected on patient demographics, medical history, and details regarding the extraction.

Data analysis: Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between antibiotic prescription prior to extraction and outcomes, alongside a sensitivity analysis that excluded antibiotics prescribed by a medical provider.

Results: The cohort included 269003 patients, who attended 385,880 dental visits. During 122,810 visits (31.8%), patients received antibiotics prior to extraction, with amoxicillin the most frequently prescribed. Antibiotics were more commonly prescribed in those who received a surgical extraction. In total, 3387 patients experienced a complication. Of these patients, 1272 had received antibiotics, compared with 2115 who had not. The regression analysis determined that diabetes was a statistically significant modifier of an association. For patients without diabetes, receiving antibiotics increased the odds of a post-extraction complication.

Conclusions: In this sample of older people, there was no association between being prescribed antibiotics and post-extraction complications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evidence-based dentistry
Evidence-based dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信