Internal hernia in patients after duodenal switch: A multi-centred comparative analysis.

IF 2.2 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Clinical Obesity Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1111/cob.12729
Romulo P Lind, Graziella Galvao Goncalves, Amanda Belluzzi, Karl Hage, Juliana Antunes, Muhammad Ghanem, Muhammad A Jawad, Michael Kendrick, Omar M Ghanem, Andre F Teixeira
{"title":"Internal hernia in patients after duodenal switch: A multi-centred comparative analysis.","authors":"Romulo P Lind, Graziella Galvao Goncalves, Amanda Belluzzi, Karl Hage, Juliana Antunes, Muhammad Ghanem, Muhammad A Jawad, Michael Kendrick, Omar M Ghanem, Andre F Teixeira","doi":"10.1111/cob.12729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) and single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve (SADI-S) are associated with superior and sustained weight loss outcomes. Despite their growing popularity, long-term safety profiles, particularly the risk of internal hernia (IH), remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and characteristics of IH following BPD-DS and SADI-S procedures, comparing their clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, and outcomes. A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent BPD-DS or SADI-S between 2008 and 2023 in two high-volume tertiary referral centres for bariatric surgery in the United States. Demographic data, comorbidities, operative details, and follow-up outcomes were collected. A subgroup analysis of IH cases was conducted to compare the incidence, location of hernias, and diagnostic modalities between procedures. Out of 1160 patients (85.1% BPD-DS; 14.9% SADI-S), the overall incidence of IH was 1.12%, with a higher rate in BPD-DS (0.8%) than in SADI-S (0.57%). Most IHs occurred within the first 24 months postoperatively. The majority of IHs in BPD-DS patients were in the pseudo-Petersen's space. The single IH case in the SADI-S group occurred in the same space. Most patients presented with abdominal pain and were diagnosed by CT imaging. SADI-S showed a lower IH rate compared to BPD-DS, but further studies are needed to confirm these findings. The variability in clinical presentation complicates the diagnosis of IH, emphasizing the need for increased clinical vigilance.</p>","PeriodicalId":10399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Obesity","volume":" ","pages":"e12729"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) and single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve (SADI-S) are associated with superior and sustained weight loss outcomes. Despite their growing popularity, long-term safety profiles, particularly the risk of internal hernia (IH), remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and characteristics of IH following BPD-DS and SADI-S procedures, comparing their clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, and outcomes. A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent BPD-DS or SADI-S between 2008 and 2023 in two high-volume tertiary referral centres for bariatric surgery in the United States. Demographic data, comorbidities, operative details, and follow-up outcomes were collected. A subgroup analysis of IH cases was conducted to compare the incidence, location of hernias, and diagnostic modalities between procedures. Out of 1160 patients (85.1% BPD-DS; 14.9% SADI-S), the overall incidence of IH was 1.12%, with a higher rate in BPD-DS (0.8%) than in SADI-S (0.57%). Most IHs occurred within the first 24 months postoperatively. The majority of IHs in BPD-DS patients were in the pseudo-Petersen's space. The single IH case in the SADI-S group occurred in the same space. Most patients presented with abdominal pain and were diagnosed by CT imaging. SADI-S showed a lower IH rate compared to BPD-DS, but further studies are needed to confirm these findings. The variability in clinical presentation complicates the diagnosis of IH, emphasizing the need for increased clinical vigilance.

十二指肠转换后患者的内疝:一项多中心比较分析。
胆胰转流配合十二指肠开关(BPD-DS)和单吻合术十二指肠回肠套筒造口(SADI-S)与良好和持续的减肥结果相关。尽管它们越来越受欢迎,但长期安全性,特别是内部疝(IH)的风险,仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在评估BPD-DS和SADI-S手术后IH的发生率和特征,比较它们的临床表现、诊断方法和结果。对2008年至2023年间在美国两家大容量三级转诊中心接受BPD-DS或SADI-S手术的患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。收集了人口统计数据、合并症、手术细节和随访结果。对IH病例进行亚组分析,比较不同手术的发生率、疝位置和诊断方式。1160例患者中(85.1% BPD-DS;14.9% SADI-S),总体IH发病率为1.12%,其中BPD-DS(0.8%)高于SADI-S(0.57%)。大多数IHs发生在术后前24个月内。BPD-DS患者的his大部分位于伪petersen空间。SADI-S组的单一IH病例发生在同一空间。大多数患者表现为腹痛,并通过CT成像诊断。与BPD-DS相比,SADI-S的IH率较低,但需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。临床表现的可变性使IH的诊断复杂化,强调需要提高临床警惕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Obesity
Clinical Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities. Key areas of interest are: • Patient assessment, classification, diagnosis and prognosis • Drug treatments, clinical trials and supporting research • Bariatric surgery and follow-up issues • Surgical approaches to remove body fat • Pharmacological, dietary and behavioural approaches for weight loss • Clinical physiology • Clinically relevant epidemiology • Psychological aspects of obesity • Co-morbidities • Nursing and care of patients with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信