The road to best practices in body donation

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Joy Y. Balta, Thomas H. Champney, Christopher Ferrigno, Laura E. Johnson, Callum F. Ross, Brandi Schmitt, Heather F. Smith
{"title":"The road to best practices in body donation","authors":"Joy Y. Balta,&nbsp;Thomas H. Champney,&nbsp;Christopher Ferrigno,&nbsp;Laura E. Johnson,&nbsp;Callum F. Ross,&nbsp;Brandi Schmitt,&nbsp;Heather F. Smith","doi":"10.1002/ase.2539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The American Association for Anatomy convened a task force to create a best practices and recommendations document for human body donation, addressing a critical need for standardized guidelines in this area. The task force included members with specialized expertise in procedural and ethical aspects of body donation programs. Their aim was to ensure that the process of body donation adheres to the highest ethical standards, protecting both the dignity of donors and the integrity of the programs that receive them. This document represents the first comprehensive guide to ethical best practices in working with body donors, offering clear and actionable recommendations for professionals in the field. In this viewpoint article, JYB, Chair of the Human Body Donation Committee, provides a summary of how these guidelines were developed, covering the various procedural and ethical considerations. The Q&amp;A format of the article further explains the document's key areas and its impact on future practices.</p><p>The American Association for Anatomy was lacking a comprehensive document with best practice recommendations. The organization had a list of resources and a few policies—but no detailed guidelines. This may be the first of its kind—a comprehensive document that aligns best practices and recommendations for body donation.</p><p>The Human Body Donation Committee (HBDC) thought it would be helpful to create this because, in the United States, there's not much oversight—legal, federal, or state—in most places. It is really up to the body donation programs to do what they think is best for the donors. As anatomists and body donation program professionals, we have a responsibility to ensure we are promoting best practices and ethical ways of working with donors. Donors trust us with their bodies and expect us to act in their best interest after they pass.</p><p>The process to generate the best practice document took many years and was quite complicated. Initially, the American Association for Anatomy created a task force to respond to legislative bills and media requests. As the task force discovered a big gap between what guidelines were available versus what was needed, the task force advocated for many years to establish a committee. Once approved, one of our jobs was to create these best practices.</p><p>We spent a lot of time discussing and developing definitions and terms, which was challenging but necessary to ensure understanding and consistency. We then created a table of contents, which was first presented to the AAA Board, and then to the membership at the 2023 anatomy meeting, during which we requested and gathered feedback on what the AAA membership wanted to see included in the document.</p><p>Different teams of HBDC members drafted sections, shared among the whole committee and we held meetings to discuss. Once we had a comprehensive draft, we sent it to the Board for feedback, made changes based on their input, and then opened it for membership feedback again. This way, it wasn't just the task force's input but also the entire American Association for Anatomy.</p><p>After these rounds of feedback, our Internal Affairs Subcommittee made the final changes and brought them to the larger committee for approval. The AAA Board then gave their approval. Our last step was to go through the submission process with ASE where peer reviewers made impactful contributions to the document. All contributions are acknowledged in the document. To summarize, the process was lengthy and involved a large number of individuals and the entire membership of the American Association for Anatomy.</p><p>We aimed for this document to be as comprehensive as possible. The law, specifically the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act, generally allows a donation to be made and how to do so, but not much else. We therefore wanted to provide recommendations and best practices for the entire body donation process.</p><p>The document includes best practices for everything from setting up policies, financial modeling for the body donation program and establishing an oversight committee through to obtaining consent, working with donors, technical operations, and donor memorialization.</p><p>There's also a human element—staffing. We discuss the best ways to train individuals and ensure they are up-to-date on best practices. We address end users, whether they are academics, researchers, or clinicians, and outline the best ways to inform them about best practices that emphasize uses, conduct and terminology.</p><p>We also address the disposition of bodies, such as cremation, and how to bring the process full circle by acknowledging donors through services or memorials.</p><p>These are the key areas we covered, each with multiple sections and considerations for working with donors.</p><p>The best practices document starts with the ethical premise that donors are consenting individuals who are trusting us with the stewardship of their bodies. The document emphasizes that it is our responsibility to treat the donors with respect and honor, and to teach others to do the same. We also emphasize a transparent process and a contemporary view on how body donors contribute to education and research.</p><p>All the individuals who contributed to this document were either directors of body donation programs, faculty with donor program responsibilities, or researchers. For example, in the Balta Lab, there is a PhD student and three master's students whose research contributed to this document. The document is the result of both experience and research with many professionals sharing their expertise. It is based on evidence and is meant for everyone working with donors to consider.</p><p>From the perspective of an educator who is not running a human body donation program, it is our ethical responsibility to ask where the bodies come from and to be familiar with the consent they have given. It is important not just for those running body donation programs, but also for those utilizing donors to educate the next generation of healthcare workers.</p><p>We also include students in this as well, since it can be challenging for them to enter the lab. One of the main things we tell them to help process this experience of dealing with death for the first time is that they are not doing anything wrong. It is helpful for students to know that these individuals donated their bodies for them to learn. This knowledge helps students process their emotions and the triggering feelings they may have in the lab. So, it is very important for students, educators, and even donors to see that we are doing a lot to protect them after they pass.</p><p>\n \n <i>Human body donation programs best practices and recommended standards: A task force report from the American Association for Anatomy</i>\n \n </p><p><b>Joy Y. Balta:</b> Conceptualization; writing – review and editing; writing – original draft. <b>Thomas H. Champney:</b> Writing – review and editing; writing – original draft. <b>Christopher Ferrigno:</b> Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>Laura E. Johnson:</b> Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>Callum F. Ross:</b> Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>Brandi Schmitt:</b> Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. <b>Heather F. Smith:</b> Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"5-7"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The American Association for Anatomy convened a task force to create a best practices and recommendations document for human body donation, addressing a critical need for standardized guidelines in this area. The task force included members with specialized expertise in procedural and ethical aspects of body donation programs. Their aim was to ensure that the process of body donation adheres to the highest ethical standards, protecting both the dignity of donors and the integrity of the programs that receive them. This document represents the first comprehensive guide to ethical best practices in working with body donors, offering clear and actionable recommendations for professionals in the field. In this viewpoint article, JYB, Chair of the Human Body Donation Committee, provides a summary of how these guidelines were developed, covering the various procedural and ethical considerations. The Q&A format of the article further explains the document's key areas and its impact on future practices.

The American Association for Anatomy was lacking a comprehensive document with best practice recommendations. The organization had a list of resources and a few policies—but no detailed guidelines. This may be the first of its kind—a comprehensive document that aligns best practices and recommendations for body donation.

The Human Body Donation Committee (HBDC) thought it would be helpful to create this because, in the United States, there's not much oversight—legal, federal, or state—in most places. It is really up to the body donation programs to do what they think is best for the donors. As anatomists and body donation program professionals, we have a responsibility to ensure we are promoting best practices and ethical ways of working with donors. Donors trust us with their bodies and expect us to act in their best interest after they pass.

The process to generate the best practice document took many years and was quite complicated. Initially, the American Association for Anatomy created a task force to respond to legislative bills and media requests. As the task force discovered a big gap between what guidelines were available versus what was needed, the task force advocated for many years to establish a committee. Once approved, one of our jobs was to create these best practices.

We spent a lot of time discussing and developing definitions and terms, which was challenging but necessary to ensure understanding and consistency. We then created a table of contents, which was first presented to the AAA Board, and then to the membership at the 2023 anatomy meeting, during which we requested and gathered feedback on what the AAA membership wanted to see included in the document.

Different teams of HBDC members drafted sections, shared among the whole committee and we held meetings to discuss. Once we had a comprehensive draft, we sent it to the Board for feedback, made changes based on their input, and then opened it for membership feedback again. This way, it wasn't just the task force's input but also the entire American Association for Anatomy.

After these rounds of feedback, our Internal Affairs Subcommittee made the final changes and brought them to the larger committee for approval. The AAA Board then gave their approval. Our last step was to go through the submission process with ASE where peer reviewers made impactful contributions to the document. All contributions are acknowledged in the document. To summarize, the process was lengthy and involved a large number of individuals and the entire membership of the American Association for Anatomy.

We aimed for this document to be as comprehensive as possible. The law, specifically the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act, generally allows a donation to be made and how to do so, but not much else. We therefore wanted to provide recommendations and best practices for the entire body donation process.

The document includes best practices for everything from setting up policies, financial modeling for the body donation program and establishing an oversight committee through to obtaining consent, working with donors, technical operations, and donor memorialization.

There's also a human element—staffing. We discuss the best ways to train individuals and ensure they are up-to-date on best practices. We address end users, whether they are academics, researchers, or clinicians, and outline the best ways to inform them about best practices that emphasize uses, conduct and terminology.

We also address the disposition of bodies, such as cremation, and how to bring the process full circle by acknowledging donors through services or memorials.

These are the key areas we covered, each with multiple sections and considerations for working with donors.

The best practices document starts with the ethical premise that donors are consenting individuals who are trusting us with the stewardship of their bodies. The document emphasizes that it is our responsibility to treat the donors with respect and honor, and to teach others to do the same. We also emphasize a transparent process and a contemporary view on how body donors contribute to education and research.

All the individuals who contributed to this document were either directors of body donation programs, faculty with donor program responsibilities, or researchers. For example, in the Balta Lab, there is a PhD student and three master's students whose research contributed to this document. The document is the result of both experience and research with many professionals sharing their expertise. It is based on evidence and is meant for everyone working with donors to consider.

From the perspective of an educator who is not running a human body donation program, it is our ethical responsibility to ask where the bodies come from and to be familiar with the consent they have given. It is important not just for those running body donation programs, but also for those utilizing donors to educate the next generation of healthcare workers.

We also include students in this as well, since it can be challenging for them to enter the lab. One of the main things we tell them to help process this experience of dealing with death for the first time is that they are not doing anything wrong. It is helpful for students to know that these individuals donated their bodies for them to learn. This knowledge helps students process their emotions and the triggering feelings they may have in the lab. So, it is very important for students, educators, and even donors to see that we are doing a lot to protect them after they pass.

Human body donation programs best practices and recommended standards: A task force report from the American Association for Anatomy

Joy Y. Balta: Conceptualization; writing – review and editing; writing – original draft. Thomas H. Champney: Writing – review and editing; writing – original draft. Christopher Ferrigno: Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Laura E. Johnson: Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Callum F. Ross: Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Brandi Schmitt: Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Heather F. Smith: Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing.

通往遗体捐献最佳实践之路。
美国解剖学协会(American Association for Anatomy)召集了一个工作组,为人体捐赠制定最佳实践和建议文件,以解决这一领域对标准化指导方针的迫切需求。该工作组的成员在遗体捐赠项目的程序和道德方面具有专业知识。他们的目的是确保遗体捐赠过程遵循最高的道德标准,既保护捐赠者的尊严,又保护接受捐赠的项目的完整性。本文件是第一本关于与遗体捐献者合作的最佳道德做法的综合指南,为该领域的专业人员提供了明确和可操作的建议。在这篇观点文章中,人体捐赠委员会主席JYB总结了这些指导方针是如何制定的,涵盖了各种程序和伦理考虑。文章的Q&amp;A格式进一步解释了该文件的关键领域及其对未来实践的影响。美国解剖学协会缺乏一份具有最佳实践建议的全面文件。该组织有一份资源清单和一些政策,但没有详细的指导方针。这可能是此类文件中的第一份——一份综合了遗体捐赠最佳实践和建议的文件。人体捐赠委员会(HBDC)认为这样做会有帮助,因为在美国,大多数地方没有太多的监管——法律、联邦或州。这真的取决于遗体捐赠项目做他们认为对捐赠者最好的事情。作为解剖学家和遗体捐赠项目的专业人士,我们有责任确保我们正在推广与捐赠者合作的最佳实践和道德方式。捐赠者把他们的身体托付给我们,并期望我们在他们去世后为他们的最大利益行事。生成最佳实践文档的过程花费了很多年,而且相当复杂。最初,美国解剖学协会成立了一个特别工作组来回应立法法案和媒体的要求。由于工作组发现现有的指导方针与需要的指导方针之间存在巨大差距,因此工作组多年来一直主张建立一个委员会。一旦获得批准,我们的工作之一就是创建这些最佳实践。我们花了很多时间讨论和开发定义和术语,这很有挑战性,但对于确保理解和一致性是必要的。然后,我们创建了一个目录,首先提交给AAA董事会,然后在2023年的解剖会议上提交给成员,在此期间,我们请求并收集了AAA成员希望在文件中看到的内容的反馈。不同小组的HBDC成员起草章节,在整个委员会之间分享,我们召开会议讨论。一旦我们有了一个全面的草案,我们就把它发送给董事会征求反馈,根据他们的意见进行修改,然后再次开放给成员反馈。通过这种方式,不仅是工作组的投入,也是整个美国解剖学协会的投入。经过这几轮反馈后,我们的内部事务小组委员会做出了最后的修改,并将其提交给更大的委员会批准。AAA董事会随后批准了这一提议。我们的最后一步是通过ASE的提交过程,同行审稿人对文档做出了有影响力的贡献。所有的贡献都在文件中得到确认。总而言之,这个过程很漫长,涉及大量的个人和整个美国解剖学协会的成员。我们的目标是使这份文件尽可能地全面。这项法律,特别是《统一解剖赠予法》(Uniform anatomy Gift Act),通常允许捐赠的方式和方式,但没有太多其他规定。因此,我们希望为整个遗体捐赠过程提供建议和最佳实践。该文件涵盖了从制定政策、遗体捐赠计划的财务模型、建立监督委员会到获得同意、与捐赠者合作、技术操作和捐赠者纪念等各个方面的最佳实践。还有人的因素——人员配置。我们讨论了培训个人的最佳方式,并确保他们掌握最新的最佳实践。我们针对最终用户,无论他们是学者、研究人员还是临床医生,并概述了告知他们强调用途、行为和术语的最佳实践的最佳方法。我们还讨论了遗体的处置,例如火化,以及如何通过服务或纪念活动承认捐赠者,从而使这一过程完整循环。这些是我们涉及的关键领域,每个领域都有多个部分和与捐助者合作的考虑。最佳实践文件从道德前提开始,即捐赠者是同意的个人,他们信任我们对他们的身体进行管理。 该文件强调,我们有责任尊重和尊重捐赠者,并教导其他人也这样做。我们还强调透明的过程和当代观点,即遗体捐赠者如何为教育和研究做出贡献。所有为这份文件做出贡献的人要么是遗体捐赠项目的负责人,要么是负责捐赠项目的教员,要么是研究人员。例如,在Balta实验室,有一名博士生和三名硕士生,他们的研究为本文做出了贡献。该文件是许多专业人员分享其专业知识的经验和研究的结果。它以证据为基础,供与捐助者合作的每个人考虑。从一个没有开展人体捐赠项目的教育工作者的角度来看,我们的道德责任是询问尸体来自哪里,并熟悉他们的同意。这不仅对那些开展遗体捐赠项目的人很重要,而且对那些利用捐赠者教育下一代医疗工作者的人也很重要。我们也包括学生,因为对他们来说进入实验室是一个挑战。我们告诉他们的主要事情之一是帮助他们处理第一次面对死亡的经历,他们没有做错任何事。让学生知道这些人捐献自己的身体是为了让他们学习,这是有帮助的。这些知识可以帮助学生处理他们的情绪,以及他们在实验室中可能产生的触发情绪。因此,让学生、教育工作者甚至捐赠者看到我们在他们去世后做了很多工作来保护他们是非常重要的。人体捐赠计划的最佳实践和推荐标准:美国解剖学协会乔伊·y·巴尔塔工作组报告:概念化;写作——审阅和编辑;写作-原稿。Thomas H. Champney:写作-评论和编辑;写作-原稿。克里斯托弗·费里尼奥:写作-原稿;写作——审阅和编辑。劳拉·约翰逊:写作——原稿;写作——审阅和编辑。卡勒姆·罗斯:写作——原稿;写作——审阅和编辑。布兰迪·施密特:写作-原稿;写作——审阅和编辑。希瑟·f·史密斯:写作-原稿;写作——审阅和编辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信