Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy With Half-Dose Tenecteplase in Patients With STEMI: Prespecified Pooled Analysis of Patients Aged ≥75 Years in STREAM-1 and 2.
Kevin R Bainey, Robert C Welsh, Yinggan Zheng, Alexandra Arias-Mendoza, Arsen D Ristic, Oleg V Averkov, Yves Lambert, José F Kerr Saraiva, Pablo Sepulveda, Fernando Rosell-Ortiz, John K French, Ljilja B Musić, Tracy Temple, Eric Ly, Kris Bogaerts, Peter R Sinnaeve, Thierry Danays, Cynthia M Westerhout, Frans Van de Werf, Paul W Armstrong
{"title":"Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy With Half-Dose Tenecteplase in Patients With STEMI: Prespecified Pooled Analysis of Patients Aged ≥75 Years in STREAM-1 and 2.","authors":"Kevin R Bainey, Robert C Welsh, Yinggan Zheng, Alexandra Arias-Mendoza, Arsen D Ristic, Oleg V Averkov, Yves Lambert, José F Kerr Saraiva, Pablo Sepulveda, Fernando Rosell-Ortiz, John K French, Ljilja B Musić, Tracy Temple, Eric Ly, Kris Bogaerts, Peter R Sinnaeve, Thierry Danays, Cynthia M Westerhout, Frans Van de Werf, Paul W Armstrong","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In STREAM-1 (Strategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction), excess intracranial hemorrhage occurred in patients aged ≥75 years receiving full-dose tenecteplase as part of a pharmaco-invasive strategy, whereas no further intracranial hemorrhage occurred after halving the tenecteplase dose. In STREAM-2 (Second Strategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction), half-dose tenecteplase was an effective and safe pharmaco-invasive strategy in older patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction presenting within <3 hours, compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We prespecified evaluating the efficacy and safety of a half-dose versus full-dose pharmaco-invasive strategy and compared the half-dose pharmaco-invasive strategy to primary PCI in patients aged ≥75 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We pooled data sets in patients aged ≥75 years from STREAM-1 and STREAM-2 receiving a pharmaco-invasive strategy versus primary PCI. Resolution of ST-segment-elevation after fibrinolysis and angiography was assessed, as was the relative risk of the primary composite of 30-day all-cause death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and shock, along with bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 390 patients were included: 42 patients were randomized to full-dose pharmaco-invasive treatment, 205 patients to half-dose pharmaco-invasive treatment, and 143 patients to primary PCI. Half-dose versus full-dose pharmaco-invasive treatment resulted in similar proportions of patients achieving ≥50% ST-segment resolution posttenecteplase (63.2% versus 62.6%), with reduced intracranial hemorrhage (7.1% versus 0%, respectively). Half-dose pharmaco-invasive treatment and primary PCI also had similar proportions of patients with ≥50% ST-segment resolution postangiography (77.9% versus 72.4%; <i>P</i>=0.277) and comparable composite end points (23.4% versus 28.0%; relative risk, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.62-1.30]; <i>P</i>=0.567) without occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comparable efficacy exists between half- and full-dose tenecteplase pharmaco-invasive treatments with improved safety in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction aged ≥75 years. Half-dose pharmaco-invasive therapy is a legitimate therapeutic option for elderly patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction unable to access timely primary PCI.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00623623. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02777580.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"17 12","pages":"e014251"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014251","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In STREAM-1 (Strategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction), excess intracranial hemorrhage occurred in patients aged ≥75 years receiving full-dose tenecteplase as part of a pharmaco-invasive strategy, whereas no further intracranial hemorrhage occurred after halving the tenecteplase dose. In STREAM-2 (Second Strategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction), half-dose tenecteplase was an effective and safe pharmaco-invasive strategy in older patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction presenting within <3 hours, compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We prespecified evaluating the efficacy and safety of a half-dose versus full-dose pharmaco-invasive strategy and compared the half-dose pharmaco-invasive strategy to primary PCI in patients aged ≥75 years.
Methods: We pooled data sets in patients aged ≥75 years from STREAM-1 and STREAM-2 receiving a pharmaco-invasive strategy versus primary PCI. Resolution of ST-segment-elevation after fibrinolysis and angiography was assessed, as was the relative risk of the primary composite of 30-day all-cause death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and shock, along with bleeding.
Results: A total of 390 patients were included: 42 patients were randomized to full-dose pharmaco-invasive treatment, 205 patients to half-dose pharmaco-invasive treatment, and 143 patients to primary PCI. Half-dose versus full-dose pharmaco-invasive treatment resulted in similar proportions of patients achieving ≥50% ST-segment resolution posttenecteplase (63.2% versus 62.6%), with reduced intracranial hemorrhage (7.1% versus 0%, respectively). Half-dose pharmaco-invasive treatment and primary PCI also had similar proportions of patients with ≥50% ST-segment resolution postangiography (77.9% versus 72.4%; P=0.277) and comparable composite end points (23.4% versus 28.0%; relative risk, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.62-1.30]; P=0.567) without occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage.
Conclusions: Comparable efficacy exists between half- and full-dose tenecteplase pharmaco-invasive treatments with improved safety in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction aged ≥75 years. Half-dose pharmaco-invasive therapy is a legitimate therapeutic option for elderly patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction unable to access timely primary PCI.
背景:在STREAM-1(心肌梗死后早期策略性再灌注)中,年龄≥75岁的患者在接受全剂量替奈普酶作为药物侵入策略的一部分时发生过量颅内出血,而将替奈普酶剂量减半后未发生进一步颅内出血。在STREAM-2(心肌梗死后早期第二次策略性再灌注)中,半剂量替尼普酶是st段抬高型心肌梗死老年患者有效且安全的药物侵入策略,研究方法如下:我们汇总了STREAM-1和STREAM-2中年龄≥75岁的患者接受药物侵入策略与初次PCI的数据集。评估纤溶和血管造影后st段抬高的消退情况,以及30天全因死亡、心肌梗死、心力衰竭、休克和出血等主要并发症的相对风险。结果:共纳入390例患者:42例患者随机分为全剂量药物侵入组,205例患者随机分为半剂量药物侵入组,143例患者随机分为初级PCI组。半剂量与全剂量药物侵入性治疗导致达到≥50% st段溶解的患者比例相似(63.2%对62.6%),颅内出血减少(分别为7.1%对0%)。半剂量药物侵入性治疗和首次PCI造影后st段分辨力≥50%的患者比例也相似(77.9% vs 72.4%;P=0.277)和可比的综合终点(23.4% vs 28.0%;相对危险度为0.90 [95% CI, 0.62-1.30];P=0.567),未发生颅内出血。结论:对于年龄≥75岁的st段抬高型心肌梗死患者,半剂量和全剂量替奈普酶药物侵入治疗的疗效相当,且安全性更高。半剂量药物侵入治疗是老年st段抬高型心肌梗死患者无法及时行原发性PCI的合法治疗选择。注册:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT00623623。URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT02777580。
期刊介绍:
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.