British economic strategy and regional institutions in Asia, 2016–2024

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Tim Summers, Chen Li, Chunzi Miao
{"title":"British economic strategy and regional institutions in Asia, 2016–2024","authors":"Tim Summers,&nbsp;Chen Li,&nbsp;Chunzi Miao","doi":"10.1007/s10308-024-00711-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the British approach to Asia and its regional institutions from the Brexit vote in 2016 to the British general election of July 2024. The paper analyses official government statements and debates among political elites about Britain’s foreign policy posture in the region, from the broad ‘Indo-Pacific tilt’ and the Belt and Road Initiative to engagement with specific regional institutions such as ASEAN, BRI, AIIB, CPTPP and bilateral trade and investment agreements. It argues that approaches to regional institutions in and across Asia are driven by a combination of a dominant policy view that there is a need to engage with Asia which is becoming economically and strategically more important in a changing world, alongside a desire to decentre China in British strategic approaches to the region (partly in response to US-China strategic rivalry). However, given China’s centrality to regional economic growth in Asia, this approach creates contradictions which are rarely addressed in British policy debates. This paper will contribute not only to understanding British foreign policy, but also shed light on the evolving “new regionalism” and power dynamics across the Indo/Asia–Pacific, and how actors external to the region view and engage with the development of regional institutions in Asia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45680,"journal":{"name":"Asia Europe Journal","volume":"22 4","pages":"403 - 421"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10308-024-00711-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Europe Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10308-024-00711-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the British approach to Asia and its regional institutions from the Brexit vote in 2016 to the British general election of July 2024. The paper analyses official government statements and debates among political elites about Britain’s foreign policy posture in the region, from the broad ‘Indo-Pacific tilt’ and the Belt and Road Initiative to engagement with specific regional institutions such as ASEAN, BRI, AIIB, CPTPP and bilateral trade and investment agreements. It argues that approaches to regional institutions in and across Asia are driven by a combination of a dominant policy view that there is a need to engage with Asia which is becoming economically and strategically more important in a changing world, alongside a desire to decentre China in British strategic approaches to the region (partly in response to US-China strategic rivalry). However, given China’s centrality to regional economic growth in Asia, this approach creates contradictions which are rarely addressed in British policy debates. This paper will contribute not only to understanding British foreign policy, but also shed light on the evolving “new regionalism” and power dynamics across the Indo/Asia–Pacific, and how actors external to the region view and engage with the development of regional institutions in Asia.

2016-2024 年英国在亚洲的经济战略和地区机构
本文考察了从2016年英国脱欧公投到2024年7月英国大选期间,英国对亚洲及其区域机构的态度。本文分析了官方政府声明和政治精英之间关于英国在该地区外交政策姿态的辩论,从广泛的“印度-太平洋倾斜”和“一带一路”倡议,到与东盟、“一带一路”、亚投行、CPTPP和双边贸易和投资协定等具体地区机构的接触。它认为,在亚洲和整个亚洲地区建立区域性机构的方法是由两种主要政策观点共同驱动的,一种主要政策观点认为,在不断变化的世界中,有必要与在经济和战略上越来越重要的亚洲接触,另一种是英国希望将中国分散到该地区的战略方法中(部分是为了应对美中战略竞争)。然而,鉴于中国在亚洲地区经济增长中的中心地位,这种做法产生了在英国政策辩论中很少提及的矛盾。本文不仅有助于理解英国的外交政策,还有助于阐明印度/亚太地区不断演变的“新区域主义”和权力动态,以及该地区以外的参与者如何看待和参与亚洲区域机构的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Europe Journal
Asia Europe Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Asia-Europe Journal is a quarterly journal dedicated to publishing quality academic papers and policy discussions on common challenges facing Asia and Europe that help to shape narratives on the common futures - including both risks and opportunities - of Asia and Europe. The Journal welcomes academically and intellectually rigorous research papers as well as topical policy briefs and thought pieces on issues of bi-regional interest, including management and political economy, innovation, security studies, regional and global governance, as well as on relevant socio-cultural developments and historical events. Officially cited as: Asia Eur J
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信