Technical, environmental and economic analysis of utilizing hydrogen-rich fuel in decarbonized container ships†

IF 5 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Payam Shafie, Alain DeChamplain and Julien Lepine
{"title":"Technical, environmental and economic analysis of utilizing hydrogen-rich fuel in decarbonized container ships†","authors":"Payam Shafie, Alain DeChamplain and Julien Lepine","doi":"10.1039/D4SE01109K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This paper analyzes the substitution of conventional fuels with hydrogen-rich fuel derived from ammonia for two different types of container ships, focusing on technical, environmental, and economic perspectives. Four operation modes are investigated including marine diesel oil (MDO), dual-fuel (50 : 50 and 25 : 75 percentages of MDO : H<small><sub>2</sub></small>-rich fuel) and pure H<small><sub>2</sub></small>-rich fuel. The environmental impact of using H<small><sub>2</sub></small>-rich fuel is assessed based on the tank-to-wake and well-to-wake CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>-equivalent emissions, considering different ammonia production pathways. The results reveal that all the alternative modes exhibit decreased tank-to-wake emissions compared to MDO. The minimum reduction percentage is related to the 50 : 50 mode at about 44%, and an average well-to-wake reduction of 3.5 and 6.3 g per t NM is achievable by using blue and green ammonia, respectively. Moreover, to avoid any increase in the total costs of alternative modes compared to the reference mode, the future ammonia fuel price should be less than 384 $ per t. The research demonstrates that H<small><sub>2</sub></small>-rich fuel is a viable alternative fuel for container ships, providing notable environmental benefits. While initial costs are higher, long-term economic advantages can be achieved through carbon pricing.</p>","PeriodicalId":104,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy & Fuels","volume":" 1","pages":" 185-197"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/se/d4se01109k","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyzes the substitution of conventional fuels with hydrogen-rich fuel derived from ammonia for two different types of container ships, focusing on technical, environmental, and economic perspectives. Four operation modes are investigated including marine diesel oil (MDO), dual-fuel (50 : 50 and 25 : 75 percentages of MDO : H2-rich fuel) and pure H2-rich fuel. The environmental impact of using H2-rich fuel is assessed based on the tank-to-wake and well-to-wake CO2-equivalent emissions, considering different ammonia production pathways. The results reveal that all the alternative modes exhibit decreased tank-to-wake emissions compared to MDO. The minimum reduction percentage is related to the 50 : 50 mode at about 44%, and an average well-to-wake reduction of 3.5 and 6.3 g per t NM is achievable by using blue and green ammonia, respectively. Moreover, to avoid any increase in the total costs of alternative modes compared to the reference mode, the future ammonia fuel price should be less than 384 $ per t. The research demonstrates that H2-rich fuel is a viable alternative fuel for container ships, providing notable environmental benefits. While initial costs are higher, long-term economic advantages can be achieved through carbon pricing.

Abstract Image

脱碳集装箱船使用富氢燃料的技术、环境和经济分析
本文从技术、环境和经济的角度分析了两种不同类型的集装箱船用氨衍生的富氢燃料替代传统燃料的情况。研究了船用柴油(MDO)、双燃料(50:50和25:75百分比的MDO:富h2燃料)和纯富h2燃料四种运行模式。考虑到不同的氨生产途径,根据罐到尾流和井到尾流的二氧化碳当量排放来评估使用富h2燃料的环境影响。结果表明,与MDO相比,所有替代模式都表现出减少的罐尾排放。最小减量百分比与50:50模式有关,约为44%,使用蓝色和绿色氨分别可实现3.5和6.3 g / t NM的井尾平均减量。此外,为了避免替代模式与参考模式相比总成本的增加,未来氨燃料的价格应低于384美元/吨。研究表明,富h2燃料是一种可行的集装箱船替代燃料,具有显著的环境效益。虽然初始成本较高,但可以通过碳定价实现长期经济优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy & Fuels
Sustainable Energy & Fuels Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
394
期刊介绍: Sustainable Energy & Fuels will publish research that contributes to the development of sustainable energy technologies with a particular emphasis on new and next-generation technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信