Innovative Technology for Secondary Fly Ash Full Resource Utilization: Industrial Testing and Life Cycle Assessment Research

IF 7.3 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yanfei Lin, Guoxia Wei, Hanqiao Liu*, Zilu Liu and Qi Li, 
{"title":"Innovative Technology for Secondary Fly Ash Full Resource Utilization: Industrial Testing and Life Cycle Assessment Research","authors":"Yanfei Lin,&nbsp;Guoxia Wei,&nbsp;Hanqiao Liu*,&nbsp;Zilu Liu and Qi Li,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c0685810.1021/acssuschemeng.4c06858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The application of incineration fly ash (IFA) sintering technology has brought a large amount of secondary fly ash (SFA) rich in heavy metals and chlorides, and its treatment has attracted much attention. A unique three-step treatment technology involving acid washing, heavy metal precipitation, and chloride evaporation has recently been developed to achieve complete resource utilization of SFA. The industrial test results showed that the optimum liquid/solid (L/S) ratio and Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> amount added were 2:1 and 30%, respectively, in the acid washing step. In the heavy metal precipitation step, the use of a solid NaOH precipitant at pH 10 was optimal for the removal of heavy metals. For chloride evaporation, the average consumption of steam and electricity for each tonne of filtrate was 0.4 t and 16.5 kw·h, respectively. Furthermore, the environmental impact of the three steps was evaluated separately through the life cycle assessment (LCA) method based on the industrial test results. The results indicated that the acid washing stage had the greatest environmental impact on the whole process. Finally, considering that the IFA sintering ceramics plant has a large amount of available deacidification waste solution and waste heat flue gas, the potential for improving the environmental and economic performance of the overall process through technological innovation was analyzed using LCA and the life cycle costing (LCC) method. The LCA results showed that the optimization scenario with two innovative units performed better in terms of environmental sustainability, decreasing the global warming impact by 29.5% compared to the normal scenario. The LCC results demonstrated that the optimization scenario with an LCC value of −8.15 USD/t was more economically efficient than the normal scenario with that of 4.27 USD/t.</p>","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":"12 49","pages":"17770–17782 17770–17782"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c06858","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of incineration fly ash (IFA) sintering technology has brought a large amount of secondary fly ash (SFA) rich in heavy metals and chlorides, and its treatment has attracted much attention. A unique three-step treatment technology involving acid washing, heavy metal precipitation, and chloride evaporation has recently been developed to achieve complete resource utilization of SFA. The industrial test results showed that the optimum liquid/solid (L/S) ratio and Ca(OH)2 amount added were 2:1 and 30%, respectively, in the acid washing step. In the heavy metal precipitation step, the use of a solid NaOH precipitant at pH 10 was optimal for the removal of heavy metals. For chloride evaporation, the average consumption of steam and electricity for each tonne of filtrate was 0.4 t and 16.5 kw·h, respectively. Furthermore, the environmental impact of the three steps was evaluated separately through the life cycle assessment (LCA) method based on the industrial test results. The results indicated that the acid washing stage had the greatest environmental impact on the whole process. Finally, considering that the IFA sintering ceramics plant has a large amount of available deacidification waste solution and waste heat flue gas, the potential for improving the environmental and economic performance of the overall process through technological innovation was analyzed using LCA and the life cycle costing (LCC) method. The LCA results showed that the optimization scenario with two innovative units performed better in terms of environmental sustainability, decreasing the global warming impact by 29.5% compared to the normal scenario. The LCC results demonstrated that the optimization scenario with an LCC value of −8.15 USD/t was more economically efficient than the normal scenario with that of 4.27 USD/t.

Abstract Image

二次粉煤灰资源化利用创新技术:工业试验与生命周期评价研究
焚烧粉煤灰(IFA)烧结技术的应用带来了大量富含重金属和氯化物的二次粉煤灰(SFA),其处理备受关注。近年来,人们开发了一种独特的酸洗、重金属沉淀和氯化物蒸发三步处理技术,以实现SFA的完全资源化利用。工业试验结果表明,酸洗步骤的最佳液固比为2:1,Ca(OH)2的添加量为30%。在重金属沉淀步骤中,使用pH为10的固体NaOH沉淀剂对重金属的去除效果最佳。氯化物蒸发每吨滤液的平均蒸汽量为0.4 t,蒸汽量为16.5 kw·h。在工业试验结果的基础上,通过生命周期评价方法对三个步骤的环境影响分别进行了评价。结果表明,酸洗阶段对整个工艺过程的环境影响最大。最后,考虑到IFA烧结厂有大量可用的脱酸废液和余热烟气,采用LCA和生命周期成本法(LCC)分析了通过技术创新提高整个工艺的环境和经济效益的潜力。LCA结果表明,与常规情景相比,具有两个创新单元的优化情景在环境可持续性方面表现较好,减少了29.5%的全球变暖影响。LCC结果表明,LCC值为- 8.15 USD/t的优化方案比LCC值为4.27 USD/t的正常方案更具经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1470
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment. The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信