On the Performance of Second-Order Polarization Propagator Methods in the Calculation of 1JFC and nJFH NMR Spin–Spin Coupling Constants

IF 5.7 1区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Marinella de Giovanetti, Rodrigo A. Cormanich and Stephan P. A. Sauer*, 
{"title":"On the Performance of Second-Order Polarization Propagator Methods in the Calculation of 1JFC and nJFH NMR Spin–Spin Coupling Constants","authors":"Marinella de Giovanetti,&nbsp;Rodrigo A. Cormanich and Stephan P. A. Sauer*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c0104310.1021/acs.jctc.4c01043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study evaluates the performance of doubles-corrected random phase approximation (RPA) and higher random phase approximation (HRPA) approaches in predicting nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) coupling constants involving fluorine. Their performance is benchmarked against experimental data and compared with that of higher-level theoretical methods, specifically second-order polarization propagator (SOPPA) and SOPPA(CCSD). Additionally, we discuss their performance relative to density functional theory (DFT). We find that RPA(D) is severely constrained by (near) triplet instabilities, while HRPA(D) demonstrates markedly improved stability. Statistical analysis reveals stronger patterns for carbon–fluorine couplings across the methods and systems investigated compared with fluorine–hydrogen couplings. While SOPPA-based methodologies prove to be superior in accuracy, HRPA(D) shows promising performance in reducing the computational burden of these calculations, albeit with a tendency to underestimate the coupling strength. These findings highlight the potential of HRPA(D) as a practical alternative to SOPPA methods, even for such difficult properties as NMR spin–spin coupling constants involving fluorine, emphasizing its role in improving predictive accuracy and efficiency across diverse chemical environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":"20 23","pages":"10453–10467 10453–10467"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01043","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of doubles-corrected random phase approximation (RPA) and higher random phase approximation (HRPA) approaches in predicting nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) coupling constants involving fluorine. Their performance is benchmarked against experimental data and compared with that of higher-level theoretical methods, specifically second-order polarization propagator (SOPPA) and SOPPA(CCSD). Additionally, we discuss their performance relative to density functional theory (DFT). We find that RPA(D) is severely constrained by (near) triplet instabilities, while HRPA(D) demonstrates markedly improved stability. Statistical analysis reveals stronger patterns for carbon–fluorine couplings across the methods and systems investigated compared with fluorine–hydrogen couplings. While SOPPA-based methodologies prove to be superior in accuracy, HRPA(D) shows promising performance in reducing the computational burden of these calculations, albeit with a tendency to underestimate the coupling strength. These findings highlight the potential of HRPA(D) as a practical alternative to SOPPA methods, even for such difficult properties as NMR spin–spin coupling constants involving fluorine, emphasizing its role in improving predictive accuracy and efficiency across diverse chemical environments.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
16.40%
发文量
568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信