Influence of Coal Stress Sensitivity on the Desorption Production Characteristics and Residual CH4 Distribution of Thin Multilayered Coal Seams

IF 5.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Jianlong Xiong, Zhijun Zhang*, Qian Wang, Jian Shen, Paul W.J. Glover, Piroska Lorinczi, Jun Zhang and Siliang Zheng, 
{"title":"Influence of Coal Stress Sensitivity on the Desorption Production Characteristics and Residual CH4 Distribution of Thin Multilayered Coal Seams","authors":"Jianlong Xiong,&nbsp;Zhijun Zhang*,&nbsp;Qian Wang,&nbsp;Jian Shen,&nbsp;Paul W.J. Glover,&nbsp;Piroska Lorinczi,&nbsp;Jun Zhang and Siliang Zheng,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c0387210.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c03872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Multilayer codevelopment technology can significantly enhance the efficiency of coalbed methane (CBM) production in multilayer thin coal seams. When facing multiple coal seams with low permeability and large differences in permeability between layers, investigating the impact of permeability and its stress sensitivity on the desorption and production patterns of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) is fundamental to the implementation of multilayer codevelopment techniques. Permeability stress sensitivity tests on coal cores, CH<sub>4</sub> desorption production experiments, and quantitative analysis of CH<sub>4</sub> distribution in coal were conducted on coal samples with varying permeabilities in order to identify an optimal pressure drawdown approach that mitigates the adverse effects of permeability differences on multilayer codevelopment. Experimental findings indicate that a significant shift in permeability ratios among coal seams is observed, from 1:18.9:5.4 to 1:43.1:10.8, which exacerbates interlayer differences, which occurs as reservoir pressure decreases to the abandonment. The linear pressure decline method is found to be effective in enhancing CH<sub>4</sub> recovery, particularly in low-permeability coal, with a high recovery rate of 71.6%. This method outperforms both stepwise and direct pressure decline methods, which achieve recovery rates of 67.5% and 54.7%, respectively. The study also reveals that high-permeability coal exhibits 4.8–9.5% higher CH<sub>4</sub> recovery rates than that of low-permeability coal with a linear decrease in pressure. The high-permeability coal also reaches the peak CH<sub>4</sub> production rate earlier and maintains it for a longer period. The higher adsorbed CH<sub>4</sub> recovery rates and more uniform distribution of residual adsorbed CH<sub>4</sub> in high-permeability coal suggest that CH<sub>4</sub> in micropores is more readily desorbed. The study underscores the importance of reasonable bottom hole flowing pressure control for optimizing multilayer codevelopment and provides a scientific basis for the effective development of CBM in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"38 23","pages":"22820–22832 22820–22832"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c03872","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multilayer codevelopment technology can significantly enhance the efficiency of coalbed methane (CBM) production in multilayer thin coal seams. When facing multiple coal seams with low permeability and large differences in permeability between layers, investigating the impact of permeability and its stress sensitivity on the desorption and production patterns of methane (CH4) is fundamental to the implementation of multilayer codevelopment techniques. Permeability stress sensitivity tests on coal cores, CH4 desorption production experiments, and quantitative analysis of CH4 distribution in coal were conducted on coal samples with varying permeabilities in order to identify an optimal pressure drawdown approach that mitigates the adverse effects of permeability differences on multilayer codevelopment. Experimental findings indicate that a significant shift in permeability ratios among coal seams is observed, from 1:18.9:5.4 to 1:43.1:10.8, which exacerbates interlayer differences, which occurs as reservoir pressure decreases to the abandonment. The linear pressure decline method is found to be effective in enhancing CH4 recovery, particularly in low-permeability coal, with a high recovery rate of 71.6%. This method outperforms both stepwise and direct pressure decline methods, which achieve recovery rates of 67.5% and 54.7%, respectively. The study also reveals that high-permeability coal exhibits 4.8–9.5% higher CH4 recovery rates than that of low-permeability coal with a linear decrease in pressure. The high-permeability coal also reaches the peak CH4 production rate earlier and maintains it for a longer period. The higher adsorbed CH4 recovery rates and more uniform distribution of residual adsorbed CH4 in high-permeability coal suggest that CH4 in micropores is more readily desorbed. The study underscores the importance of reasonable bottom hole flowing pressure control for optimizing multilayer codevelopment and provides a scientific basis for the effective development of CBM in the region.

Abstract Image

煤应力敏感性对薄多层煤层解吸生成特征和残余甲烷分布的影响
多层协同开发技术可以显著提高多层薄煤层煤层气的开采效率。面对多层低渗透、层间渗透率差异大的煤层,研究渗透率及其应力敏感性对甲烷解吸产气规律的影响,是实施多层协同开发技术的基础。针对不同渗透率煤样,开展了煤岩心渗透率应力敏感性试验、CH4解吸生产实验和煤中CH4分布定量分析,以确定降低渗透率差异对多层共开发不利影响的最佳降压方法。实验结果表明,随着储层压力的减小至弃井阶段,各煤层渗透率比发生了显著变化,渗透率比由1:18.9:5.4变为1:43.1:10.8,加剧了层间差异。线性压降法可以有效提高CH4的采收率,特别是在低渗透煤中,CH4的采收率高达71.6%。该方法优于逐步压降法和直接压降法,采收率分别为67.5%和54.7%。研究还表明,随着压力的线性降低,高渗煤的CH4回收率比低渗煤高4.8 ~ 9.5%。高渗煤CH4产率峰值出现时间早、维持时间长。高渗透煤的CH4吸附回收率高,残余吸附CH4分布更均匀,说明微孔中的CH4更易解吸。研究强调了合理的井底流动压力控制对优化多层协同开发的重要性,为该地区煤层气的有效开发提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信