Deceptive signalling: Causes, consequences and remedies

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Norbert Steigenberger
{"title":"Deceptive signalling: Causes, consequences and remedies","authors":"Norbert Steigenberger","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.12392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deceptive signalling occurs when resource seekers provide communication or observable behaviour that seems to indicate high‐quality attributes yet actually misleads about the resource seekers’ attributes. Deceptive signalling is an everyday phenomenon that hurts investors, consumers and high‐quality ventures alike, leading to resource misallocation and market inefficiencies. It is also a challenge for researchers interested in signalling theory, as deceptive signalling defies signalling theory's predictions, leading to ambiguity regarding if and how deceptive signals should be analysed from a signalling theory perspective. Research on deceptive signalling has accumulated, yet it is scattered across disciplines and discourses, which hampers our ability to understand the phenomenon and obstructs progress in signalling theory. To mitigate this state of affairs, this paper provides a cross‐disciplinary integrative review, systematizing extant research on deceptive signalling, developing suggestions for the integration of deceptive signalling into signalling theory and outlining a research agenda on currently unresolved questions in signalling research pertaining to deceptive signalling. Developing a better understanding of deceptive signalling seems particularly pressing as recent advances in AI technologies, which reduce the detectability of deceptive signals as well as the costs for producing such signals, will presumably lead to an exacerbation of deceptive signalling problems.","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12392","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deceptive signalling occurs when resource seekers provide communication or observable behaviour that seems to indicate high‐quality attributes yet actually misleads about the resource seekers’ attributes. Deceptive signalling is an everyday phenomenon that hurts investors, consumers and high‐quality ventures alike, leading to resource misallocation and market inefficiencies. It is also a challenge for researchers interested in signalling theory, as deceptive signalling defies signalling theory's predictions, leading to ambiguity regarding if and how deceptive signals should be analysed from a signalling theory perspective. Research on deceptive signalling has accumulated, yet it is scattered across disciplines and discourses, which hampers our ability to understand the phenomenon and obstructs progress in signalling theory. To mitigate this state of affairs, this paper provides a cross‐disciplinary integrative review, systematizing extant research on deceptive signalling, developing suggestions for the integration of deceptive signalling into signalling theory and outlining a research agenda on currently unresolved questions in signalling research pertaining to deceptive signalling. Developing a better understanding of deceptive signalling seems particularly pressing as recent advances in AI technologies, which reduce the detectability of deceptive signals as well as the costs for producing such signals, will presumably lead to an exacerbation of deceptive signalling problems.
欺骗性信号:原因、后果和补救措施
当资源寻求者提供的交流或可观察到的行为似乎表明其具有优质属性,但实际上却误导了资源寻求者的属性时,就会出现欺骗性信号。欺骗性信号是一种日常现象,对投资者、消费者和优质企业都造成伤害,导致资源分配不当和市场效率低下。对于对信号理论感兴趣的研究人员来说,这也是一个挑战,因为欺骗性信号违背了信号理论的预测,导致从信号理论的角度是否应该以及如何分析欺骗性信号变得模糊不清。关于欺骗性信号的研究不断积累,但却分散在各个学科和论述中,这阻碍了我们理解这一现象的能力,也阻碍了信号理论的进步。为了缓解这种状况,本文进行了跨学科的综合评述,系统梳理了关于欺骗性信号的现有研究,提出了将欺骗性信号纳入信号理论的建议,并概述了与欺骗性信号相关的信号研究中目前尚未解决的问题的研究议程。最近,人工智能技术的进步降低了欺骗性信号的可探测性,也降低了制造此类信号的成本,这可能会导致欺骗性信号问题的加剧,因此,更好地理解欺骗性信号似乎尤为迫切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信