{"title":"3D Printed Limestone Monoliths for CO2 Capture in Calcium Looping","authors":"Cameron Ince, Vesna Middelkoop, Aakash Vijayaraghavan Ramesh, Nader Mahinpey","doi":"10.1021/acs.iecr.4c03232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this experiment, limestone monoliths were 3D printed using a novel limestone mixture, then tested inside of a fixed bed reactor. This represents to the author’s knowledge the first use of 3D printed monoliths in calcium looping. Four monoliths with different infill geometries were tested and compared against a random packing and limestone powder. Comparison was made through the adsorptive capacity of CO<sub>2</sub>, and the pressure drop across the column. Calcination was done at 850 °C, under pure N<sub>2</sub>, whereas carbonation was conducted at 650 °C with 15% CO<sub>2</sub>, balance N<sub>2</sub>. The adsorptive performance of these monoliths was in line with the traditional limestone powder on a millimole CO<sub>2</sub>/g<sub>sorbent</sub> basis, but the pressure drop across the column was reduced by ∼58% on average.","PeriodicalId":39,"journal":{"name":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c03232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this experiment, limestone monoliths were 3D printed using a novel limestone mixture, then tested inside of a fixed bed reactor. This represents to the author’s knowledge the first use of 3D printed monoliths in calcium looping. Four monoliths with different infill geometries were tested and compared against a random packing and limestone powder. Comparison was made through the adsorptive capacity of CO2, and the pressure drop across the column. Calcination was done at 850 °C, under pure N2, whereas carbonation was conducted at 650 °C with 15% CO2, balance N2. The adsorptive performance of these monoliths was in line with the traditional limestone powder on a millimole CO2/gsorbent basis, but the pressure drop across the column was reduced by ∼58% on average.
期刊介绍:
ndustrial & Engineering Chemistry, with variations in title and format, has been published since 1909 by the American Chemical Society. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research is a weekly publication that reports industrial and academic research in the broad fields of applied chemistry and chemical engineering with special focus on fundamentals, processes, and products.