A simple model of the turnover of organic carbon in a soil profile: model test, parameter identification and sensitivity

IF 5.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Soil Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.5194/egusphere-2024-3883
Elsa Coucheney, Anke Marianne Herrmann, Nicholas Jarvis
{"title":"A simple model of the turnover of organic carbon in a soil profile: model test, parameter identification and sensitivity","authors":"Elsa Coucheney, Anke Marianne Herrmann, Nicholas Jarvis","doi":"10.5194/egusphere-2024-3883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Abstract.</strong> Simulation models are potentially useful tools to test our understanding of the processes involved in the turnover of soil organic carbon (SOC) and to evaluate the role of management practices in maintaining stocks of SOC. We describe here a simple model of SOC turnover at the soil profile scale that accounts for two key processes determining SOC persistence (i.e. microbial energy limitation and physical protection due to soil aggregation). We tested the model and evaluated the identifiability of key parameters using topsoil SOC contents measured in three treatments with contrasting organic matter inputs (i.e. fallow, mineral fertilized and cropped, with and without straw addition) in a long-term field trial. The estimated total input of organic matter (OM) in the treatment with straw added was roughly three times that of the treatment without straw addition, but only 12 % of the additional OM input remained in the soil after 54 years. By taking microbial energy limitation and enhanced physical protection of root residues into account, the model could explain the differences in C persistence among the three treatments, whilst also accurately matching the time-courses of SOC contents using the same set of model parameters. Models that do not explicitly consider microbial energy limitation and physical protection would need to adjust their parameter values (either decomposition rate constants or the retention coefficient) to match this data. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to identify the most influential parameters in the model determining soil profile stocks of OM at steady-state. Input distributions for soil and crop parameters in the model were defined for the agricultural production area of PO4 (east-central Sweden), which includes Uppsala. The resulting model predictions compared well with aggregated soil survey data for the PO4 region. This analysis showed that model parameters affecting SOC decomposition rates, including the rate constant for microbial-processed SOC and the parameters regulating physical protection and microbial energy limitation, are more sensitive than parameters determining OM inputs. Thus, the development of pedotransfer approaches to estimate SOC decomposition rates from soil properties would help to support predictive applications of the model at larger spatial scales.","PeriodicalId":48610,"journal":{"name":"Soil","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3883","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Simulation models are potentially useful tools to test our understanding of the processes involved in the turnover of soil organic carbon (SOC) and to evaluate the role of management practices in maintaining stocks of SOC. We describe here a simple model of SOC turnover at the soil profile scale that accounts for two key processes determining SOC persistence (i.e. microbial energy limitation and physical protection due to soil aggregation). We tested the model and evaluated the identifiability of key parameters using topsoil SOC contents measured in three treatments with contrasting organic matter inputs (i.e. fallow, mineral fertilized and cropped, with and without straw addition) in a long-term field trial. The estimated total input of organic matter (OM) in the treatment with straw added was roughly three times that of the treatment without straw addition, but only 12 % of the additional OM input remained in the soil after 54 years. By taking microbial energy limitation and enhanced physical protection of root residues into account, the model could explain the differences in C persistence among the three treatments, whilst also accurately matching the time-courses of SOC contents using the same set of model parameters. Models that do not explicitly consider microbial energy limitation and physical protection would need to adjust their parameter values (either decomposition rate constants or the retention coefficient) to match this data. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to identify the most influential parameters in the model determining soil profile stocks of OM at steady-state. Input distributions for soil and crop parameters in the model were defined for the agricultural production area of PO4 (east-central Sweden), which includes Uppsala. The resulting model predictions compared well with aggregated soil survey data for the PO4 region. This analysis showed that model parameters affecting SOC decomposition rates, including the rate constant for microbial-processed SOC and the parameters regulating physical protection and microbial energy limitation, are more sensitive than parameters determining OM inputs. Thus, the development of pedotransfer approaches to estimate SOC decomposition rates from soil properties would help to support predictive applications of the model at larger spatial scales.
摘要模拟模型是一种潜在的有用工具,可用于检验我们对土壤有机碳(SOC)周转过程的理解,以及评估管理措施在维持 SOC 储量方面的作用。我们在此介绍一个简单的土壤剖面尺度 SOC 转化模型,该模型考虑了决定 SOC 持久性的两个关键过程(即微生物能量限制和土壤团聚产生的物理保护)。我们在一项长期田间试验中,利用三种有机质输入对比处理(即休耕、矿质肥料和种植,添加或不添加秸秆)测量的表土 SOC 含量,对模型进行了测试,并评估了关键参数的可识别性。据估计,添加了秸秆的处理中有机物(OM)的总输入量大约是未添加秸秆处理的三倍,但 54 年后只有 12% 的额外 OM 输入量仍留在土壤中。考虑到微生物的能量限制和根系残留物的物理保护作用,该模型可以解释三种处理在碳持久性上的差异,同时还能使用同一组模型参数精确匹配 SOC 含量的时间历程。未明确考虑微生物能量限制和物理保护的模型需要调整其参数值(分解速率常数或保留系数),以便与该数据相匹配。我们还进行了一项敏感性分析,以确定模型中决定土壤剖面稳态 OM 储量的最有影响力的参数。模型中土壤和作物参数的输入分布是针对包括乌普萨拉在内的 PO4(瑞典中东部)农业生产区确定的。得出的模型预测结果与 PO4 地区的综合土壤调查数据进行了很好的比较。分析表明,影响 SOC 分解速率的模型参数(包括微生物处理 SOC 的速率常数以及调节物理保护和微生物能量限制的参数)比决定 OM 输入的参数更为敏感。因此,开发根据土壤特性估算 SOC 分解速率的 pedotransfer 方法将有助于支持该模型在更大空间尺度上的预测应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil
Soil Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
44
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: SOIL is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of high-quality research in the field of soil system sciences. SOIL is at the interface between the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. SOIL publishes scientific research that contributes to understanding the soil system and its interaction with humans and the entire Earth system. The scope of the journal includes all topics that fall within the study of soil science as a discipline, with an emphasis on studies that integrate soil science with other sciences (hydrology, agronomy, socio-economics, health sciences, atmospheric sciences, etc.).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信