Weathering storms together: the stories behind Scandinavian support for high taxes

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1136/bmj.q2700
Sandy Goldbeck-Wood
{"title":"Weathering storms together: the stories behind Scandinavian support for high taxes","authors":"Sandy Goldbeck-Wood","doi":"10.1136/bmj.q2700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scandinavia’s high tax model thrives on shared narratives, experience, and priorities. Equality, trust, and a demand for good quality public services both create and reflect a cohesive and content society, writes Sandy Goldbeck-Wood The Scandinavian social democracies are widely admired for their world class public services, which are supported by high levels of taxation, productivity, and education, and equality of income and opportunity. In 2021, for example, Norway had a tax-to-GDP (gross domestic product) ratio of 42.2% compared with 33.5% in the UK and 24.5% in the US.12 Conversely, income inequality is notably low in Norway, which has a Gini coefficient—a measure of income distribution within a population—of just 22.7 compared with 32.6 in the UK and 39.8 in the US, where inequality approaches that in many Latin American and African countries.3 But is this egalitarianism translatable to other settings? Can other nations longing for better public services learn from this? In the Scandinavian virtuous cycle of welfare, equality, happiness, and trusted governments and institutions, it is hard to distinguish cause from effect. The fact that Scandinavians expect, and get, high quality public services “free” or with small co-payments, and baulk at paying privately for health and education, is both cause and effect of social democracy. Any lessons are likely to be complex and cultural, and perhaps contestable. The most striking aspect of Scandinavian taxation is not its top rate, which for example in Norway at 38% is not exceptionally high, but the number of people who pay this rate. The income level at which people start paying the higher rate in Norway is just 1.5 times the national average income, compared with 8.5 times in …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scandinavia’s high tax model thrives on shared narratives, experience, and priorities. Equality, trust, and a demand for good quality public services both create and reflect a cohesive and content society, writes Sandy Goldbeck-Wood The Scandinavian social democracies are widely admired for their world class public services, which are supported by high levels of taxation, productivity, and education, and equality of income and opportunity. In 2021, for example, Norway had a tax-to-GDP (gross domestic product) ratio of 42.2% compared with 33.5% in the UK and 24.5% in the US.12 Conversely, income inequality is notably low in Norway, which has a Gini coefficient—a measure of income distribution within a population—of just 22.7 compared with 32.6 in the UK and 39.8 in the US, where inequality approaches that in many Latin American and African countries.3 But is this egalitarianism translatable to other settings? Can other nations longing for better public services learn from this? In the Scandinavian virtuous cycle of welfare, equality, happiness, and trusted governments and institutions, it is hard to distinguish cause from effect. The fact that Scandinavians expect, and get, high quality public services “free” or with small co-payments, and baulk at paying privately for health and education, is both cause and effect of social democracy. Any lessons are likely to be complex and cultural, and perhaps contestable. The most striking aspect of Scandinavian taxation is not its top rate, which for example in Norway at 38% is not exceptionally high, but the number of people who pay this rate. The income level at which people start paying the higher rate in Norway is just 1.5 times the national average income, compared with 8.5 times in …
斯堪的纳维亚的高税收模式在共同的叙事、经验和优先事项的基础上蓬勃发展。平等、信任以及对优质公共服务的需求创造并反映了一个具有凝聚力和内涵的社会,桑迪-戈德贝克-伍德(Sandy Goldbeck-Wood)写道。 斯堪的纳维亚社会民主国家因其世界一流的公共服务而广受赞誉,这些公共服务由高水平的税收、生产力和教育以及收入和机会均等所支撑。例如,2021 年,挪威的税收与国内生产总值(GDP)之比为 42.2%,而英国和美国分别为 33.5%和 24.5%。12 相反,挪威的收入不平等程度也很低,基尼系数(衡量人口内部收入分配的指标)仅为 22.7,而英国和美国分别为 32.6 和 39.8,不平等程度接近许多拉美和非洲国家。其他渴望获得更好公共服务的国家能否借鉴?在斯堪的纳维亚的良性循环中,福利、平等、幸福以及可信赖的政府和机构,很难区分因果关系。斯堪的纳维亚人期望并获得 "免费 "或只需支付少量费用的高质量公共服务,而不愿意为医疗和教育支付私人费用,这既是社会民主的因,也是社会民主的果。任何教训都可能是复杂的、文化性的,也许还有争议。斯堪的纳维亚国家税收的最突出之处不在于最高税率,例如挪威的最高税率为 38%,并不算特别高,而在于缴纳这一税率的人数。在挪威,人们开始缴纳较高税率的收入水平仅为全国平均收入的 1.5 倍,而在......则为 8.5 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信