Optimizing electric traction motor design: Analyzing the benefits of a circular economy

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jesús R. Pérez-Cardona , Neha Shakelly , Matthew J. Triebe , John W. Sutherland
{"title":"Optimizing electric traction motor design: Analyzing the benefits of a circular economy","authors":"Jesús R. Pérez-Cardona ,&nbsp;Neha Shakelly ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Triebe ,&nbsp;John W. Sutherland","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The circular economy (CE) shifts from a linear economy (LE) to prioritize preserving value improving resource efficiency through closed loops. This shift demands product designs that facilitate repurposing and recycling, reducing waste and new material use. Achieving this requires changes in industry practices, consumer behavior, and supportive policies/incentives. Yet, the absence of standardized metrics poses evaluation challenges. This study introduces a combined life cycle and techno-economic assessment within a parametric design model to optimize CE strategies, including a disassembly planning algorithm linking end of life (EoL) outcomes (reuse, remanufacturing, recycling, landfill) to the life cycle inventories. Applied to a permanent magnet synchronous motor in an electric vehicle, the model evaluates supply risk, environmental benefits, and economic gains compared to LE methods. A one-way sensitivity analysis on motor collection rates explored three scenarios: baseline, 100% disassembly and recycling, and 100% reuse. Results showed significant improvements in economic and supply risks aspects under CE though environmental impact was less pronounced due to the high energy use during the use stage. Furthermore, EoL motor upper-level subassemblies had a greater effect than lower-level ones, with no interaction effects found. This paper proposes a formal method for measuring CE performance based on these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"486 ","pages":"Article 144522"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624039714","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The circular economy (CE) shifts from a linear economy (LE) to prioritize preserving value improving resource efficiency through closed loops. This shift demands product designs that facilitate repurposing and recycling, reducing waste and new material use. Achieving this requires changes in industry practices, consumer behavior, and supportive policies/incentives. Yet, the absence of standardized metrics poses evaluation challenges. This study introduces a combined life cycle and techno-economic assessment within a parametric design model to optimize CE strategies, including a disassembly planning algorithm linking end of life (EoL) outcomes (reuse, remanufacturing, recycling, landfill) to the life cycle inventories. Applied to a permanent magnet synchronous motor in an electric vehicle, the model evaluates supply risk, environmental benefits, and economic gains compared to LE methods. A one-way sensitivity analysis on motor collection rates explored three scenarios: baseline, 100% disassembly and recycling, and 100% reuse. Results showed significant improvements in economic and supply risks aspects under CE though environmental impact was less pronounced due to the high energy use during the use stage. Furthermore, EoL motor upper-level subassemblies had a greater effect than lower-level ones, with no interaction effects found. This paper proposes a formal method for measuring CE performance based on these findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

优化电动牵引电机设计:循环经济效益分析
循环经济(CE)从线性经济(LE)转变为通过闭环优先考虑保护价值和提高资源效率。这种转变要求产品设计便于重新利用和回收,减少浪费和新材料的使用。实现这一目标需要改变行业惯例、消费者行为和支持性政策/激励措施。然而,缺乏标准化的度量给评估带来了挑战。本研究在参数化设计模型中引入了生命周期和技术经济评估的结合,以优化CE策略,包括将生命周期结束(EoL)结果(再利用、再制造、回收、填埋)与生命周期清单联系起来的拆卸规划算法。将该模型应用于电动汽车的永磁同步电机,与LE方法相比,该模型评估了供应风险、环境效益和经济收益。对电机回收率的单向敏感性分析探讨了三种情况:基线、100%拆卸和回收以及100%再利用。结果显示,节能减排在经济和供应风险方面有显著改善,但由于使用阶段的高能耗,环境影响不太明显。此外,EoL电机上层子组件的影响大于下层子组件,没有发现交互效应。基于这些发现,本文提出了一种正式的测量CE绩效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信