Inducible clindamycin resistance among clinical Gram-positive cocci in a tertiary hospital in Niger Republic.

Access microbiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1099/acmi.0.000708.v4
Abdourahamane Yacouba, Malika Zeidou Alassoum, Boubacar Marou Soumana, Sahada Moussa Saley, Abdoulaye Ousmane, Harouna Moussa, Saidou Amatagas, Daouda Alhousseini, Mahamadou Doutchi, Salao Chaibou, Mamane Daou, Souleymane Brah, Eric Adehossi, Ahmed Olowo-Okere, Saidou Mamadou
{"title":"Inducible clindamycin resistance among clinical Gram-positive cocci in a tertiary hospital in Niger Republic.","authors":"Abdourahamane Yacouba, Malika Zeidou Alassoum, Boubacar Marou Soumana, Sahada Moussa Saley, Abdoulaye Ousmane, Harouna Moussa, Saidou Amatagas, Daouda Alhousseini, Mahamadou Doutchi, Salao Chaibou, Mamane Daou, Souleymane Brah, Eric Adehossi, Ahmed Olowo-Okere, Saidou Mamadou","doi":"10.1099/acmi.0.000708.v4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>. Macrolide-induced resistance to clindamycin is a well-described mechanism leading to treatment failure. Herein, we determined the frequency and associated factors of inducible clindamycin resistance in Gram-positive cocci in a tertiary care hospital. <b>Methods</b>. A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out between January and December 2022. d-tests were performed as recommended by EUCAST 2021 guidelines on 100 non-duplicate clinical isolates of Gram-positive cocci to determine the prevalence of methicillin resistance and inducible clindamycin resistance among the collected isolates. <b>Results</b>. Of the 100 Gram-positive cocci isolates, 56 (56.0%), 17 (17.0%) and 27 (27.0%) were respectively coagulase-negative staphylococci, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Streptococcus</i> spp. Among <i>Streptococcus</i> spp., Group D Streptococci (15.0%) were the most isolated. Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) represented nine (53.0%) of the <i>S. aureus</i> isolates. Constitutive (cMLSb) and inducible clindamycin resistance (iMLSb) phenotypes were detected in 36 (36.0%) and 14 (14.0 %) of the isolates, respectively. <i>S. aureus</i> exhibited 38.4% of cMLSb and 13.7% of iMLSb. The result of multivariate analysis showed that age groups, gender, type of samples, provenance, and bacteria, were not significantly associated with Gram-positive cocci iMLSb phenotype. <b>Conclusion</b>. The study reported for the first time a high prevalence of inducible resistance of Gram-positive cocci strains to clindamycin in Niger Republic. This suggests the urgent need for the implementation of regular screening of these isolates and the wise use of clindamycin in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94366,"journal":{"name":"Access microbiology","volume":"6 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000708.v4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Macrolide-induced resistance to clindamycin is a well-described mechanism leading to treatment failure. Herein, we determined the frequency and associated factors of inducible clindamycin resistance in Gram-positive cocci in a tertiary care hospital. Methods. A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out between January and December 2022. d-tests were performed as recommended by EUCAST 2021 guidelines on 100 non-duplicate clinical isolates of Gram-positive cocci to determine the prevalence of methicillin resistance and inducible clindamycin resistance among the collected isolates. Results. Of the 100 Gram-positive cocci isolates, 56 (56.0%), 17 (17.0%) and 27 (27.0%) were respectively coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus spp. Among Streptococcus spp., Group D Streptococci (15.0%) were the most isolated. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) represented nine (53.0%) of the S. aureus isolates. Constitutive (cMLSb) and inducible clindamycin resistance (iMLSb) phenotypes were detected in 36 (36.0%) and 14 (14.0 %) of the isolates, respectively. S. aureus exhibited 38.4% of cMLSb and 13.7% of iMLSb. The result of multivariate analysis showed that age groups, gender, type of samples, provenance, and bacteria, were not significantly associated with Gram-positive cocci iMLSb phenotype. Conclusion. The study reported for the first time a high prevalence of inducible resistance of Gram-positive cocci strains to clindamycin in Niger Republic. This suggests the urgent need for the implementation of regular screening of these isolates and the wise use of clindamycin in clinical practice.

尼日尔共和国一家三级医院临床革兰氏阳性球菌对克林霉素的诱导耐药性。
背景。大环内酯类药物诱导的克林霉素耐药性是导致治疗失败的一种机制。在此,我们确定了一家三级医院中革兰氏阳性球菌对克林霉素产生耐药性的频率和相关因素。方法:横断面描述性研究按照《EUCAST 2021》指南的建议,对 100 例非重复的革兰阳性球菌临床分离株进行了 d 检验,以确定所收集分离株中甲氧西林耐药性和诱导性克林霉素耐药性的发生率。研究结果在 100 个革兰氏阳性球菌分离株中,56 个(56.0%)、17 个(17.0%)和 27 个(27.0%)分别为凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和链球菌属。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)占金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的 9 个(53.0%)。在 36 个(36.0%)和 14 个(14.0%)分离物中分别检测到了组成型(cMLSb)和诱导型克林霉素耐药性(iMLSb)表型。金黄色葡萄球菌有 38.4% 的 cMLSb 表型和 13.7% 的 iMLSb 表型。多变量分析结果显示,年龄组、性别、样本类型、产地和细菌与革兰氏阳性球菌 iMLSb 表型无明显关联。结论该研究首次报告了尼日尔共和国革兰氏阳性球菌菌株对克林霉素的高诱导耐药性。这表明迫切需要对这些分离菌株进行定期筛查,并在临床实践中合理使用克林霉素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信