Development and Validation of the Resident Healthcare-Seeking Culture Scale (RHCS) Among Chinese Demographics in the Community Setting.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S462808
Hongbin Xu, Jie Feng, Lei Qiu, Shijiao Yan, Liqing Li, Qingfeng Tian, Yan He, Zuxun Lu
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Resident Healthcare-Seeking Culture Scale (RHCS) Among Chinese Demographics in the Community Setting.","authors":"Hongbin Xu, Jie Feng, Lei Qiu, Shijiao Yan, Liqing Li, Qingfeng Tian, Yan He, Zuxun Lu","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S462808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop a measurement scale with good reliability and validity to assess the reasonableness of resident healthcare-seeking culture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigation utilized a cross-sectional research design, employing a multi-stage random sampling technique to select adult inhabitants aged eighteen and above who possess fundamental literacy abilities. An online survey was conducted from March to April 2021 across 27 provinces in China, encompassing 911 questionnaires for scale development. This study primarily applied discriminant coefficients and exploratory factor analysis to refine the scale items. Scale reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and split-half reliability. Scale validity was determined through content validity and structural validity. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 21.0, and structural equation modeling was executed with AMOS 23.0 software. Statistical significance was defined at <i>P</i><0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Resident Healthcare-seeking Culture Scale (RHCS) ultimately comprised 5 dimensions and 20 items. The cumulative explained variance of the five common factors within this scale amounts to 55.24%, satisfactorily adhering to the established criterion of social science research that the extracted factors should explain between 50% and 60% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0.83. Split-half reliability was 0.87. The Pearson correlation coefficients associating the scores from the five dimensions with the overall scale score were 0.78, 0.65, 0.65, 0.64, and 0.42, respectively, all statistically significant with P-values less than 0.001. The results of confirmatory factor analysis suggested that RMR=0.045, GFI=0.952, AGFI=0.936, PGFI=0.712, NFI=0.917, IFI=0.944, TLI=0.931, CFI = 0.943, and RMSEA = 0.046.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The measurement scale for healthcare-seeking culture among Chinese residents exhibits superior reliability and validity, serving as an effective instrument for hospital administrators to evaluate the reasonableness of demand-side healthcare culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"17 ","pages":"3147-3159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11648546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S462808","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop a measurement scale with good reliability and validity to assess the reasonableness of resident healthcare-seeking culture.

Methods: This investigation utilized a cross-sectional research design, employing a multi-stage random sampling technique to select adult inhabitants aged eighteen and above who possess fundamental literacy abilities. An online survey was conducted from March to April 2021 across 27 provinces in China, encompassing 911 questionnaires for scale development. This study primarily applied discriminant coefficients and exploratory factor analysis to refine the scale items. Scale reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and split-half reliability. Scale validity was determined through content validity and structural validity. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 21.0, and structural equation modeling was executed with AMOS 23.0 software. Statistical significance was defined at P<0.05.

Results: The Resident Healthcare-seeking Culture Scale (RHCS) ultimately comprised 5 dimensions and 20 items. The cumulative explained variance of the five common factors within this scale amounts to 55.24%, satisfactorily adhering to the established criterion of social science research that the extracted factors should explain between 50% and 60% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0.83. Split-half reliability was 0.87. The Pearson correlation coefficients associating the scores from the five dimensions with the overall scale score were 0.78, 0.65, 0.65, 0.64, and 0.42, respectively, all statistically significant with P-values less than 0.001. The results of confirmatory factor analysis suggested that RMR=0.045, GFI=0.952, AGFI=0.936, PGFI=0.712, NFI=0.917, IFI=0.944, TLI=0.931, CFI = 0.943, and RMSEA = 0.046.

Conclusion: The measurement scale for healthcare-seeking culture among Chinese residents exhibits superior reliability and validity, serving as an effective instrument for hospital administrators to evaluate the reasonableness of demand-side healthcare culture.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信