Front-back asymmetries in endogenous auditory spatial attention

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Andor L. Bodnár, Jeffrey R. Mock, Edward J. Golob
{"title":"Front-back asymmetries in endogenous auditory spatial attention","authors":"Andor L. Bodnár,&nbsp;Jeffrey R. Mock,&nbsp;Edward J. Golob","doi":"10.3758/s13414-024-02995-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research on endogenous auditory spatial attention typically uses headphones or sounds in the frontal hemispace, which undersamples panoramic spatial hearing. Crossmodal attention studies also show that visual information impacts spatial hearing and attention. Given the overlap between vision and audition in frontal space, we tested the hypothesis that the distribution of endogenous auditory spatial attention would differ when attending to the front versus back hemispace. Participants performed a non-spatial discrimination task where most sounds were presented at a standard location, but occasionally shifted to other locations. Auditory spatial attention cueing and gradient effects across locations were measured in five experiments. Accuracy was greatest at standard versus shift locations, and was comparable when attending to the front or back. Reaction time measures of cueing and gradient effects were larger when attending to the front versus back midline, a finding that was evident when the range of spatial locations was 180° or 360°. When participants were blindfolded, the front/back differences were still present. Sound localization and divided attention tasks showed that the front/back differences were attentional, rather than perceptual, in nature. Collectively, the findings reveal that the impact of endogenous auditory spatial attention depends on where attention is being focused.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":"87 2","pages":"511 - 530"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-024-02995-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on endogenous auditory spatial attention typically uses headphones or sounds in the frontal hemispace, which undersamples panoramic spatial hearing. Crossmodal attention studies also show that visual information impacts spatial hearing and attention. Given the overlap between vision and audition in frontal space, we tested the hypothesis that the distribution of endogenous auditory spatial attention would differ when attending to the front versus back hemispace. Participants performed a non-spatial discrimination task where most sounds were presented at a standard location, but occasionally shifted to other locations. Auditory spatial attention cueing and gradient effects across locations were measured in five experiments. Accuracy was greatest at standard versus shift locations, and was comparable when attending to the front or back. Reaction time measures of cueing and gradient effects were larger when attending to the front versus back midline, a finding that was evident when the range of spatial locations was 180° or 360°. When participants were blindfolded, the front/back differences were still present. Sound localization and divided attention tasks showed that the front/back differences were attentional, rather than perceptual, in nature. Collectively, the findings reveal that the impact of endogenous auditory spatial attention depends on where attention is being focused.

Abstract Image

内源性听觉空间注意的前后不对称。
对内源性听觉空间注意力的研究通常使用耳机或额叶半球的声音,这对全景空间听觉采样不足。跨模态注意力研究也表明,视觉信息会影响空间听觉和注意力。鉴于视觉和听觉在前部空间的重叠,我们测试了这样一个假设:当注意前半球和后半球时,内源性听觉空间注意的分布会有所不同。受试者进行了一项非空间分辨任务,在这项任务中,大多数声音都出现在一个标准位置,但偶尔也会转移到其他位置。在五次实验中测量了听觉空间注意的提示和不同位置的梯度效应。在标准位置和转移位置上的准确率最高,在注意前方或后方时的准确率相当。当注意前中线与后中线时,提示和梯度效应的反应时间测量值更大,当空间位置范围为 180° 或 360° 时,这一结果非常明显。当被试者被蒙住眼睛时,前后差异仍然存在。声音定位和注意力分散任务表明,前后差异的本质是注意力差异,而不是知觉差异。总之,研究结果表明,内源性听觉空间注意力的影响取决于注意力集中的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信