Examining the association between habitual emotion regulation strategies and cardiovascular stress reactivity across three studies.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Biological Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108966
Alexandra T Tyra, Sarah-Beth Garner, Annie T Ginty
{"title":"Examining the association between habitual emotion regulation strategies and cardiovascular stress reactivity across three studies.","authors":"Alexandra T Tyra, Sarah-Beth Garner, Annie T Ginty","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Poor emotion regulation is associated with cardiovascular disease risk, with altered cardiovascular responses to psychological stress a possible underlying mechanism. However, prior research has predominantly focused on instructed (laboratory-based) emotion regulation; there is limited conclusive research on the relationship between every-day (habitual) emotion regulation and cardiovascular responses to active psychological stress. As such, this study aimed to examine the associations between two common habitual emotion regulation strategies-cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression-and cardiovascular stress responses across three independent laboratory studies, each involving a different active acute psychological stress task. Participants (Study 1: N = 239, 64.9 % female; Study 2: N = 289, 51.9 % female, Study 3: N = 169, 50.9 % female) underwent cardiovascular monitoring during a 10-min baseline and subsequent stress task (Study 1: mental arithmetic task; Study 2: speech task; Study 3: Multisource Interference/Stroop tasks). Participants also completed the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire and ratings of perceived task stressfulness. Cardiovascular reactivity (stress mean - baseline mean) was calculated for systolic/diastolic blood pressure and heart rate for each study. Across all three studies, regression analyses demonstrated no statistically significant linear associations between habitual emotion regulation and cardiovascular reactivity (ps ≥ .10) or self-reported perceived stress (ps ≥ .06), both before and after controlling for demographic covariates. This investigation furthers our understanding of how habitual emotion regulation strategies may-or may not-impact cardiovascular stress responses, thus providing valuable insights into the complex relationship between emotion regulation and long-term cardiovascular health.</p>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"108966"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poor emotion regulation is associated with cardiovascular disease risk, with altered cardiovascular responses to psychological stress a possible underlying mechanism. However, prior research has predominantly focused on instructed (laboratory-based) emotion regulation; there is limited conclusive research on the relationship between every-day (habitual) emotion regulation and cardiovascular responses to active psychological stress. As such, this study aimed to examine the associations between two common habitual emotion regulation strategies-cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression-and cardiovascular stress responses across three independent laboratory studies, each involving a different active acute psychological stress task. Participants (Study 1: N = 239, 64.9 % female; Study 2: N = 289, 51.9 % female, Study 3: N = 169, 50.9 % female) underwent cardiovascular monitoring during a 10-min baseline and subsequent stress task (Study 1: mental arithmetic task; Study 2: speech task; Study 3: Multisource Interference/Stroop tasks). Participants also completed the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire and ratings of perceived task stressfulness. Cardiovascular reactivity (stress mean - baseline mean) was calculated for systolic/diastolic blood pressure and heart rate for each study. Across all three studies, regression analyses demonstrated no statistically significant linear associations between habitual emotion regulation and cardiovascular reactivity (ps ≥ .10) or self-reported perceived stress (ps ≥ .06), both before and after controlling for demographic covariates. This investigation furthers our understanding of how habitual emotion regulation strategies may-or may not-impact cardiovascular stress responses, thus providing valuable insights into the complex relationship between emotion regulation and long-term cardiovascular health.

通过三项研究考察习惯性情绪调节策略与心血管应激反应之间的关系。
不良情绪调节与心血管疾病风险有关,而心血管对心理压力反应的改变可能是其潜在机制之一。然而,以往的研究主要集中在指导性(基于实验室的)情绪调节方面;而关于日常(习惯性)情绪调节与主动心理压力下心血管反应之间关系的研究却很有限。因此,本研究旨在通过三项独立的实验室研究,考察两种常见的习惯性情绪调节策略--认知重评和表达抑制--与心血管应激反应之间的关系,每项研究都涉及不同的主动急性心理应激任务。参与者(研究1:人数=239,女性占64.9%;研究2:人数=289,女性占51.9%;研究3:人数=169,女性占50.9%)在10分钟的基线和随后的压力任务(研究1:心算任务;研究2:言语任务;研究3:多源干扰/Stroop任务)中接受心血管监测。参与者还填写了情绪调节问卷和任务压力感知评分。每项研究都计算了收缩压/舒张压和心率的心血管反应性(压力平均值-基线平均值)。在所有三项研究中,回归分析表明,在控制人口统计学协变量之前和之后,习惯性情绪调节与心血管反应性(ps ≥.10)或自我报告的感知压力(ps ≥.06)之间没有统计学意义上的线性关系。这项调查加深了我们对习惯性情绪调节策略如何影响或不影响心血管应激反应的理解,从而为了解情绪调节与长期心血管健康之间的复杂关系提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Psychology
Biological Psychology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane. The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信