A Principled Approach to Adjust for Unmeasured Time-Stable Confounding of Supervised Treatment

IF 1.3 3区 生物学 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Jeppe Ekstrand Halkjær Madsen, Thomas Delvin, Thomas Scheike, Christian Pipper
{"title":"A Principled Approach to Adjust for Unmeasured Time-Stable Confounding of Supervised Treatment","authors":"Jeppe Ekstrand Halkjær Madsen,&nbsp;Thomas Delvin,&nbsp;Thomas Scheike,&nbsp;Christian Pipper","doi":"10.1002/bimj.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We propose a novel method to adjust for unmeasured time-stable confounding when the time between consecutive treatment administrations is fixed. We achieve this by focusing on a new-user cohort. Furthermore, we envisage that all time-stable confounding goes through the potential time on treatment as dictated by the disease condition at the initiation of treatment. Following this logic, we may eliminate all unmeasured time-stable confounding by adjusting for the potential time on treatment. A challenge with this approach is that right censoring of the potential time on treatment occurs when treatment is terminated at the time of the event of interest, for example, if the event of interest is death. We show how this challenge may be solved by means of the expectation-maximization algorithm without imposing any further assumptions on the distribution of the potential time on treatment. The usefulness of the methodology is illustrated in a simulation study. We also apply the methodology to investigate the effect of depression/anxiety drugs on subsequent poisoning by other medications in the Danish population by means of national registries. We find a protective effect of treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on the risk of poisoning by various medications (1- year risk difference of approximately <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>3</mn>\n <mo>%</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$-3\\%$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) and a standard Cox model analysis shows a harming effect (1-year risk difference of approximately <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n <mo>%</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$2\\%$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>), which is consistent with what we would expect due to confounding by indication. Unmeasured time-stable confounding can be entirely adjusted for when the time between consecutive treatment administrations is fixed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55360,"journal":{"name":"Biometrical Journal","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.70026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose a novel method to adjust for unmeasured time-stable confounding when the time between consecutive treatment administrations is fixed. We achieve this by focusing on a new-user cohort. Furthermore, we envisage that all time-stable confounding goes through the potential time on treatment as dictated by the disease condition at the initiation of treatment. Following this logic, we may eliminate all unmeasured time-stable confounding by adjusting for the potential time on treatment. A challenge with this approach is that right censoring of the potential time on treatment occurs when treatment is terminated at the time of the event of interest, for example, if the event of interest is death. We show how this challenge may be solved by means of the expectation-maximization algorithm without imposing any further assumptions on the distribution of the potential time on treatment. The usefulness of the methodology is illustrated in a simulation study. We also apply the methodology to investigate the effect of depression/anxiety drugs on subsequent poisoning by other medications in the Danish population by means of national registries. We find a protective effect of treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on the risk of poisoning by various medications (1- year risk difference of approximately 3 % $-3\%$ ) and a standard Cox model analysis shows a harming effect (1-year risk difference of approximately 2 % $2\%$ ), which is consistent with what we would expect due to confounding by indication. Unmeasured time-stable confounding can be entirely adjusted for when the time between consecutive treatment administrations is fixed.

调整未测量的监督治疗时间稳定混杂因素的原则性方法。
我们提出了一种新方法,用于在连续治疗之间的时间固定时调整未测量的时间稳定混杂因素。我们通过关注新用户队列来实现这一目标。此外,我们还设想,所有时间稳定混杂因素都会随着开始治疗时的疾病状况所决定的潜在治疗时间而变化。根据这一逻辑,我们可以通过调整潜在的治疗时间来消除所有未测量的时间稳定混杂因素。这种方法面临的一个挑战是,当治疗在相关事件发生时终止(例如,如果相关事件是死亡),潜在的治疗时间就会发生正确的删减。我们展示了如何通过期望最大化算法来解决这一难题,而无需对潜在治疗时间的分布做任何进一步的假设。我们通过模拟研究说明了该方法的实用性。我们还应用该方法,通过国家登记资料调查了丹麦人口中抑郁/焦虑药物对后续其他药物中毒的影响。我们发现,使用选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗对各种药物的中毒风险具有保护作用(1 年的风险差异约为 - 3 % $-3\%$),而标准 Cox 模型分析则显示出伤害作用(1 年的风险差异约为 2 % $2\%$),这与我们预期的适应症混杂情况一致。当连续治疗之间的时间固定时,未测量的时间稳定混杂因素完全可以调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biometrical Journal
Biometrical Journal 生物-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biometrical Journal publishes papers on statistical methods and their applications in life sciences including medicine, environmental sciences and agriculture. Methodological developments should be motivated by an interesting and relevant problem from these areas. Ideally the manuscript should include a description of the problem and a section detailing the application of the new methodology to the problem. Case studies, review articles and letters to the editors are also welcome. Papers containing only extensive mathematical theory are not suitable for publication in Biometrical Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信