Test Statistics and Statistical Inference for Data With Informative Cluster Sizes

IF 1.3 3区 生物学 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Soyoung Kim, Michael J. Martens, Kwang Woo Ahn
{"title":"Test Statistics and Statistical Inference for Data With Informative Cluster Sizes","authors":"Soyoung Kim,&nbsp;Michael J. Martens,&nbsp;Kwang Woo Ahn","doi":"10.1002/bimj.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In biomedical studies, investigators often encounter clustered data. The cluster sizes are said to be informative if the outcome depends on the cluster size. Ignoring informative cluster sizes in the analysis leads to biased parameter estimation in marginal and mixed-effect regression models. Several methods to analyze data with informative cluster sizes have been proposed; however, methods to test the informativeness of the cluster sizes are limited, particularly for the marginal model. In this paper, we propose a score test and a Wald test to examine the informativeness of the cluster sizes for a generalized linear model, a Cox model, and a proportional subdistribution hazards model. Statistical inference can be conducted through weighted estimating equations. The simulation results show that both tests control Type I error rates well, but the score test has higher power than the Wald test for right-censored data while the power of the Wald test is generally higher than the score test for the binary outcome. We apply the Wald and score tests to hematopoietic cell transplant data and compare regression analysis results with/without adjusting for informative cluster sizes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55360,"journal":{"name":"Biometrical Journal","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In biomedical studies, investigators often encounter clustered data. The cluster sizes are said to be informative if the outcome depends on the cluster size. Ignoring informative cluster sizes in the analysis leads to biased parameter estimation in marginal and mixed-effect regression models. Several methods to analyze data with informative cluster sizes have been proposed; however, methods to test the informativeness of the cluster sizes are limited, particularly for the marginal model. In this paper, we propose a score test and a Wald test to examine the informativeness of the cluster sizes for a generalized linear model, a Cox model, and a proportional subdistribution hazards model. Statistical inference can be conducted through weighted estimating equations. The simulation results show that both tests control Type I error rates well, but the score test has higher power than the Wald test for right-censored data while the power of the Wald test is generally higher than the score test for the binary outcome. We apply the Wald and score tests to hematopoietic cell transplant data and compare regression analysis results with/without adjusting for informative cluster sizes.

在生物医学研究中,研究人员经常会遇到聚类数据。如果结果取决于聚类大小,聚类大小就被认为是有信息量的。在分析中忽略有信息的聚类大小会导致边际回归模型和混合效应回归模型的参数估计出现偏差。目前已经提出了几种方法来分析具有信息量聚类大小的数据;然而,检验聚类大小信息量的方法却很有限,尤其是在边际模型中。在本文中,我们提出了一种得分检验和一种 Wald 检验来检验广义线性模型、Cox 模型和比例子分布危险模型的聚类大小的信息性。统计推断可通过加权估计方程进行。模拟结果表明,两种检验都能很好地控制 I 类错误率,但对于右删失数据,得分检验的功率高于 Wald 检验,而对于二元结果,Wald 检验的功率一般高于得分检验。我们将 Wald 检验和得分检验应用于造血细胞移植数据,并比较了有/无信息群组大小调整的回归分析结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biometrical Journal
Biometrical Journal 生物-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biometrical Journal publishes papers on statistical methods and their applications in life sciences including medicine, environmental sciences and agriculture. Methodological developments should be motivated by an interesting and relevant problem from these areas. Ideally the manuscript should include a description of the problem and a section detailing the application of the new methodology to the problem. Case studies, review articles and letters to the editors are also welcome. Papers containing only extensive mathematical theory are not suitable for publication in Biometrical Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信