A Parallel Process of Staff-Family Distress in Long-Term Care: A Challenge to Collaboration.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608241306403
Diandra Serrano, Tamara Sussman, Sharon Kaasalanien, Abigail Wickson-Griffiths, Genevieve Thompson, Paulette V Hunter, Health B MacIntosh, Kevin Brazil
{"title":"A Parallel Process of Staff-Family Distress in Long-Term Care: A Challenge to Collaboration.","authors":"Diandra Serrano, Tamara Sussman, Sharon Kaasalanien, Abigail Wickson-Griffiths, Genevieve Thompson, Paulette V Hunter, Health B MacIntosh, Kevin Brazil","doi":"10.1177/23779608241306403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Supporting persons living with advanced dementia in long-term care (LTC) homes requires strong collaborative partnerships between staff, family members, and residents. Yet, relational tensions-such as differing expectations around care decisions-can inhibit the implementation of collaborative partnerships at this critical point in the trajectory of care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore the emotional experiences of families and staff during shared decision-making processes for individuals with advanced dementia in LTC.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Guided by interpretative description, this qualitative study investigated the experiences of staff (<i>n</i> = 12) and families (<i>n </i>= 16) collaborating in two Canadian LTC homes. Data was collected through semistructured interviews lasting 45-60 min, which facilitated a detailed exploration of participants' narratives. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis facilitated by a combination of inductive and deductive approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis revealed a complex parallel process of trauma and grief including accumulated distress, isolation, and feelings of devalue that worked together to create distance between staff and families at a time when connection was critical. Our findings further suggested that a lack of time and space for reflection and validation for staff and family, resulted in a cycle whereby staff and families engaged in a push and pull dynamic with each viewing the other as adversaries rather than allies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight the critical need for reflexive opportunities in LTC homes to overcome and attend to the emotional barriers that interfere with true collaboration between staff and families. We hope that the proposed cycle serves as a preliminary framework to support staff in navigating difficult conversations and emotions, and fosters reflexive care that enhances, rather than obstructs, connections.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"10 ","pages":"23779608241306403"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11648007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241306403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Supporting persons living with advanced dementia in long-term care (LTC) homes requires strong collaborative partnerships between staff, family members, and residents. Yet, relational tensions-such as differing expectations around care decisions-can inhibit the implementation of collaborative partnerships at this critical point in the trajectory of care.

Objective: This study aims to explore the emotional experiences of families and staff during shared decision-making processes for individuals with advanced dementia in LTC.

Method: Guided by interpretative description, this qualitative study investigated the experiences of staff (n = 12) and families (n = 16) collaborating in two Canadian LTC homes. Data was collected through semistructured interviews lasting 45-60 min, which facilitated a detailed exploration of participants' narratives. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis facilitated by a combination of inductive and deductive approaches.

Results: Our analysis revealed a complex parallel process of trauma and grief including accumulated distress, isolation, and feelings of devalue that worked together to create distance between staff and families at a time when connection was critical. Our findings further suggested that a lack of time and space for reflection and validation for staff and family, resulted in a cycle whereby staff and families engaged in a push and pull dynamic with each viewing the other as adversaries rather than allies.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight the critical need for reflexive opportunities in LTC homes to overcome and attend to the emotional barriers that interfere with true collaboration between staff and families. We hope that the proposed cycle serves as a preliminary framework to support staff in navigating difficult conversations and emotions, and fosters reflexive care that enhances, rather than obstructs, connections.

介绍:在长期护理(LTC)机构中为晚期痴呆症患者提供支持,需要工作人员、家庭成员和住户之间建立强有力的合作关系。然而,关系紧张--例如对护理决策的不同期望--可能会在护理轨迹的这一关键点上阻碍合作关系的实施:本研究旨在探讨家属和员工在为长者照护中心的晚期痴呆症患者共同决策过程中的情感体验:在解释性描述的指导下,这项定性研究调查了加拿大两家 LTC 养老院的员工(12 人)和家属(16 人)的合作经历。数据是通过持续 45-60 分钟的半结构式访谈收集的,这有助于详细探讨参与者的叙述。对访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用归纳和演绎相结合的方法进行了反思性主题分析:我们的分析揭示了一个复杂的创伤和悲伤并行的过程,包括累积的痛苦、孤立和被贬低的感觉,这些因素共同造成了工作人员和家庭之间的距离,而此时联系是至关重要的。我们的研究结果进一步表明,工作人员和家庭缺乏反思和确认的时间和空间,导致了工作人员和家庭之间的推拉关系,双方都将对方视为对手而非盟友:我们的研究结果突出表明,长者照护之家亟需反思机会,以克服和关注干扰工作人员与家庭之间真正合作的情感障碍。我们希望所提出的循环可以作为一个初步框架,支持员工在困难的对话和情绪中游刃有余,并促进反思性护理,从而加强而不是阻碍联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信