Comparative analysis of ethical standards for the utilization of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Brazil: Resolutions from 1992 to 2023.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Wanderlucia Arcelino Guedes, Laisa Kimberly Rodrigues Santos, Victoria Nascimento Milanez, Marília Lima de Brito, Gabriel Acácio de Moura, Paula Bruno Monteiro
{"title":"Comparative analysis of ethical standards for the utilization of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Brazil: Resolutions from 1992 to 2023.","authors":"Wanderlucia Arcelino Guedes, Laisa Kimberly Rodrigues Santos, Victoria Nascimento Milanez, Marília Lima de Brito, Gabriel Acácio de Moura, Paula Bruno Monteiro","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20240069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to its documented records and technological achievements, in vitro embryo creation technology is still honored worldwide forty years after Louise Brown's birth on July 25, 1978. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that one in six people globally who are of reproductive age may have infertility at some point in their lives. In this environment, it has become noteworthy for couples or patients to want to become pregnant through operations carried out by Assisted Human Reproduction Centers (AHRCs). This continual quest for AHRCs has already been demonstrated in Brazil, where data from the National Embryo Production System (SISEMBRIO) show that as of 2022, there were around 192 clinics nationally that offered AHRC services, and a total of 284,210 frozen embryos. The ethical conundrums that these techniques provide persist notwithstanding their remarkable success in helping patients achieve clinical pregnancies and viable embryos. The absence of legislation on reproductive assistance is another significant factor pertaining to Brazilian regulatory resolutions. As a result, clinics, hospitals, and sperm banks operating in this field are required to adhere to guidelines created by the Federal Council of Medicine (CFM). The first resolution was published on September 30, 1992. In light of the aforementioned, acquiring and keeping an eye on the standards that the CFM has developed over time helps enhance knowledge of the moral and legal framework that governs Brazil. Thus, the current study attempts to provide a comparative analysis of Brazilian ethical norms regarding the use of assisted human reproduction technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":"6-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to its documented records and technological achievements, in vitro embryo creation technology is still honored worldwide forty years after Louise Brown's birth on July 25, 1978. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that one in six people globally who are of reproductive age may have infertility at some point in their lives. In this environment, it has become noteworthy for couples or patients to want to become pregnant through operations carried out by Assisted Human Reproduction Centers (AHRCs). This continual quest for AHRCs has already been demonstrated in Brazil, where data from the National Embryo Production System (SISEMBRIO) show that as of 2022, there were around 192 clinics nationally that offered AHRC services, and a total of 284,210 frozen embryos. The ethical conundrums that these techniques provide persist notwithstanding their remarkable success in helping patients achieve clinical pregnancies and viable embryos. The absence of legislation on reproductive assistance is another significant factor pertaining to Brazilian regulatory resolutions. As a result, clinics, hospitals, and sperm banks operating in this field are required to adhere to guidelines created by the Federal Council of Medicine (CFM). The first resolution was published on September 30, 1992. In light of the aforementioned, acquiring and keeping an eye on the standards that the CFM has developed over time helps enhance knowledge of the moral and legal framework that governs Brazil. Thus, the current study attempts to provide a comparative analysis of Brazilian ethical norms regarding the use of assisted human reproduction technology.

巴西使用辅助生殖技术的伦理标准比较分析:1992 年至 2023 年的决议。
由于有据可查的记录和技术成就,体外胚胎制造技术在路易丝-布朗于 1978 年 7 月 25 日出生 40 年后的今天仍然受到全世界的尊敬。世界卫生组织(WHO)报告称,全球每六个育龄人群中就有一人可能在一生中的某个阶段患有不孕症。在这种环境下,夫妇或患者希望通过辅助人类生殖中心(AHRCs)的手术怀孕,这已成为一个值得关注的问题。巴西国家胚胎生产系统(SISEMBRIO)的数据显示,截至 2022 年,全国约有 192 家诊所提供辅助人类生殖中心服务,冷冻胚胎总数达 284210 个。尽管这些技术在帮助患者实现临床妊娠和获得可存活胚胎方面取得了显著成功,但其带来的伦理难题依然存在。缺乏有关生殖援助的立法是影响巴西监管决议的另一个重要因素。因此,在这一领域开展业务的诊所、医院和精子库必须遵守联邦医学委员会(CFM)制定的指导方针。第一份决议于 1992 年 9 月 30 日发布。鉴于上述情况,掌握并关注联邦医学委员会长期以来制定的标准,有助于增进对巴西道德和法律框架的了解。因此,本研究试图对巴西有关使用人类辅助生殖技术的伦理规范进行比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信