Comprehensive radiographic grading system and clinical outcomes of canine tibial avulsion fractures in dogs.

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Oscar Alas, Aitor Gallastegui, Jorge Hernandez, Matthew Johnson
{"title":"Comprehensive radiographic grading system and clinical outcomes of canine tibial avulsion fractures in dogs.","authors":"Oscar Alas, Aitor Gallastegui, Jorge Hernandez, Matthew Johnson","doi":"10.1111/vru.13473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The tibial apophysis is a separate center of ossification in the proximal tibia of skeletally immature dogs. Because it is made of cartilage during development, it is prone to fractures (avulsions) and other tensile-related injuries. One prior veterinary study proposed a classification system for proximal tibial apophyseal fractures, but this study did not include fractures that involved the proximal tibial physis or metaphysis, which have been described in human classification systems. The objectives of the study reported here were (1) to characterize and establish a radiographic grading system of proximal tibial apophyseal fractures in dogs, (2) to investigate the intra- and interobserver agreements of the proposed grading system, and (3) to identify associations between fracture types and patient signalment, surgical fixation, and clinical outcomes. This is a retrospective and observational study where images were assessed twice in a randomized order at least two weeks apart by three observers. The most frequent fracture configurations were type 1 (33/49, 67.3%) and type 5 (13/49, 26.5%), followed by type 4 (2/49, 4%) and type 2 (1/49, 2%). A fracture configuration type 3 was not identified. Dogs with a concurrent fibular fracture were associated with type 4 and 5 tibial avulsion fractures (P < .01). The intraobserver agreement for observers 1 and 2 was kappa ≥0.88, and for observer 3, kappa = 0.63. In conclusion, this study introduces an enhanced classification system for tibial apophyseal fractures in dogs, demonstrating substantial to moderate intraobserver reliability and moderate to modest interobserver agreement.</p>","PeriodicalId":23581,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound","volume":"66 1","pages":"e13473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.13473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The tibial apophysis is a separate center of ossification in the proximal tibia of skeletally immature dogs. Because it is made of cartilage during development, it is prone to fractures (avulsions) and other tensile-related injuries. One prior veterinary study proposed a classification system for proximal tibial apophyseal fractures, but this study did not include fractures that involved the proximal tibial physis or metaphysis, which have been described in human classification systems. The objectives of the study reported here were (1) to characterize and establish a radiographic grading system of proximal tibial apophyseal fractures in dogs, (2) to investigate the intra- and interobserver agreements of the proposed grading system, and (3) to identify associations between fracture types and patient signalment, surgical fixation, and clinical outcomes. This is a retrospective and observational study where images were assessed twice in a randomized order at least two weeks apart by three observers. The most frequent fracture configurations were type 1 (33/49, 67.3%) and type 5 (13/49, 26.5%), followed by type 4 (2/49, 4%) and type 2 (1/49, 2%). A fracture configuration type 3 was not identified. Dogs with a concurrent fibular fracture were associated with type 4 and 5 tibial avulsion fractures (P < .01). The intraobserver agreement for observers 1 and 2 was kappa ≥0.88, and for observer 3, kappa = 0.63. In conclusion, this study introduces an enhanced classification system for tibial apophyseal fractures in dogs, demonstrating substantial to moderate intraobserver reliability and moderate to modest interobserver agreement.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound
Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
17.60%
发文量
133
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is a bimonthly, international, peer-reviewed, research journal devoted to the fields of veterinary diagnostic imaging and radiation oncology. Established in 1958, it is owned by the American College of Veterinary Radiology and is also the official journal for six affiliate veterinary organizations. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is represented on the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, World Association of Medical Editors, and Committee on Publication Ethics. The mission of Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is to serve as a leading resource for high quality articles that advance scientific knowledge and standards of clinical practice in the areas of veterinary diagnostic radiology, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, nuclear imaging, radiation oncology, and interventional radiology. Manuscript types include original investigations, imaging diagnosis reports, review articles, editorials and letters to the Editor. Acceptance criteria include originality, significance, quality, reader interest, composition and adherence to author guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信