Comprehensive Investigation of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Networks for Identifying Multispecies Tomato Insect Images.

IF 3.4 3区 综合性期刊 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Sensors Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.3390/s24237858
Chittathuru Himala Praharsha, Alwin Poulose, Chetan Badgujar
{"title":"Comprehensive Investigation of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Networks for Identifying Multispecies Tomato Insect Images.","authors":"Chittathuru Himala Praharsha, Alwin Poulose, Chetan Badgujar","doi":"10.3390/s24237858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep learning applications in agriculture are advancing rapidly, leveraging data-driven learning models to enhance crop yield and nutrition. Tomato (<i>Solanum lycopersicum</i>), a vegetable crop, frequently suffers from pest damage and drought, leading to reduced yields and financial losses to farmers. Accurate detection and classification of tomato pests are the primary steps of integrated pest management practices, which are crucial for sustainable agriculture. This paper explores using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to classify tomato pest images automatically. Specifically, we investigate the impact of various optimizers on classification performance, including AdaDelta, AdaGrad, Adam, RMSprop, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), and Nadam. A diverse dataset comprising 4263 images of eight common tomato pests was used to train and evaluate a customized CNN model. Extensive experiments were conducted to compare the performance of different optimizers in terms of classification accuracy, convergence speed, and robustness. RMSprop achieved the highest validation accuracy of 89.09%, a precision of 88%, recall of 85%, and F1 score of 86% among the optimizers, outperforming other optimizer-based CNN architectures. Additionally, conventional machine learning models such as logistic regression, random forest, naive Bayes classifier, support vector machine, decision tree classifier, and K-nearest neighbors (KNN) were applied to the tomato pest dataset. The best optimizer-based CNN architecture results were compared with these machine learning models. Furthermore, we evaluated the cross-validation results of various optimizers for tomato pest classification. The cross-validation results demonstrate that the Nadam optimizer with CNN outperformed the other optimizer-based approaches and achieved a mean accuracy of 79.12% and F1 score of 78.92%, which is 14.48% higher than the RMSprop optimizer-based approach. The state-of-the-art deep learning models such as LeNet, AlexNet, Xception, Inception, ResNet, and MobileNet were compared with the CNN-optimized approaches and validated the significance of our RMSprop and Nadam-optimized CNN approaches. Our findings provide insights into the effectiveness of each optimizer for tomato pest classification tasks, offering valuable guidance for practitioners and researchers in agricultural image analysis. This research contributes to advancing automated pest detection systems, ultimately aiding in early pest identification and proactive pest management strategies in tomato cultivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21698,"journal":{"name":"Sensors","volume":"24 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11644929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/s24237858","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep learning applications in agriculture are advancing rapidly, leveraging data-driven learning models to enhance crop yield and nutrition. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), a vegetable crop, frequently suffers from pest damage and drought, leading to reduced yields and financial losses to farmers. Accurate detection and classification of tomato pests are the primary steps of integrated pest management practices, which are crucial for sustainable agriculture. This paper explores using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to classify tomato pest images automatically. Specifically, we investigate the impact of various optimizers on classification performance, including AdaDelta, AdaGrad, Adam, RMSprop, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), and Nadam. A diverse dataset comprising 4263 images of eight common tomato pests was used to train and evaluate a customized CNN model. Extensive experiments were conducted to compare the performance of different optimizers in terms of classification accuracy, convergence speed, and robustness. RMSprop achieved the highest validation accuracy of 89.09%, a precision of 88%, recall of 85%, and F1 score of 86% among the optimizers, outperforming other optimizer-based CNN architectures. Additionally, conventional machine learning models such as logistic regression, random forest, naive Bayes classifier, support vector machine, decision tree classifier, and K-nearest neighbors (KNN) were applied to the tomato pest dataset. The best optimizer-based CNN architecture results were compared with these machine learning models. Furthermore, we evaluated the cross-validation results of various optimizers for tomato pest classification. The cross-validation results demonstrate that the Nadam optimizer with CNN outperformed the other optimizer-based approaches and achieved a mean accuracy of 79.12% and F1 score of 78.92%, which is 14.48% higher than the RMSprop optimizer-based approach. The state-of-the-art deep learning models such as LeNet, AlexNet, Xception, Inception, ResNet, and MobileNet were compared with the CNN-optimized approaches and validated the significance of our RMSprop and Nadam-optimized CNN approaches. Our findings provide insights into the effectiveness of each optimizer for tomato pest classification tasks, offering valuable guidance for practitioners and researchers in agricultural image analysis. This research contributes to advancing automated pest detection systems, ultimately aiding in early pest identification and proactive pest management strategies in tomato cultivation.

机器学习和深度学习网络在多物种番茄昆虫图像识别中的综合研究。
深度学习在农业中的应用正在迅速发展,利用数据驱动的学习模型来提高作物产量和营养。番茄(Solanum lycopersicum)是一种蔬菜作物,经常遭受虫害和干旱,导致产量下降和农民经济损失。番茄害虫的准确检测和分类是害虫综合治理的首要步骤,对农业可持续发展至关重要。本文探索利用卷积神经网络(cnn)对番茄害虫图像进行自动分类。具体来说,我们研究了各种优化器对分类性能的影响,包括AdaDelta, AdaGrad, Adam, RMSprop,随机梯度下降(SGD)和Nadam。使用包含4263张8种常见番茄害虫图像的多样化数据集来训练和评估定制的CNN模型。我们进行了大量的实验来比较不同优化器在分类精度、收敛速度和鲁棒性方面的性能。在这些优化器中,RMSprop的验证准确率最高,达到89.09%,精密度为88%,召回率为85%,F1得分为86%,优于其他基于优化器的CNN架构。此外,将逻辑回归、随机森林、朴素贝叶斯分类器、支持向量机、决策树分类器和k近邻(KNN)等传统机器学习模型应用于番茄害虫数据集。将基于优化器的最佳CNN架构结果与这些机器学习模型进行比较。此外,我们还评估了各种优化器对番茄害虫分类的交叉验证结果。交叉验证结果表明,基于CNN的Nadam优化器优于其他基于优化器的方法,平均准确率为79.12%,F1得分为78.92%,比基于RMSprop优化器的方法提高了14.48%。将最先进的深度学习模型(如LeNet、AlexNet、Xception、Inception、ResNet和MobileNet)与CNN优化方法进行比较,并验证了我们的RMSprop和nadam优化CNN方法的重要性。我们的研究结果为每个优化器在番茄害虫分类任务中的有效性提供了见解,为农业图像分析的从业者和研究人员提供了有价值的指导。该研究有助于推进自动化害虫检测系统,最终帮助番茄种植中的早期害虫识别和主动虫害管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sensors
Sensors 工程技术-电化学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
8430
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of sensors and biosensors. It publishes reviews (including comprehensive reviews on the complete sensors products), regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信