How accurate is high-resolution computed tomography of the chest in differentiating between pulmonary invasive fungal infections and other pulmonary infections in children with cancer?

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1007/s00247-024-06112-2
Janine Nijhuis, Geertje P Verduin, Tom F W Wolfs, Tineke T Stolk, Daniela Cianci, Laura G Y Rotte, Caroline A Lindemans, Louis J Bont, Rutger A J Nievelstein
{"title":"How accurate is high-resolution computed tomography of the chest in differentiating between pulmonary invasive fungal infections and other pulmonary infections in children with cancer?","authors":"Janine Nijhuis, Geertje P Verduin, Tom F W Wolfs, Tineke T Stolk, Daniela Cianci, Laura G Y Rotte, Caroline A Lindemans, Louis J Bont, Rutger A J Nievelstein","doi":"10.1007/s00247-024-06112-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary invasive fungal infections pose a serious risk for immunocompromised patients. Although diagnostic imaging plays an important role in the early detection of pulmonary invasive fungal infections, radiological differentiation between invasive fungal infection and other pulmonary infections is challenging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in the differentiation between pulmonary invasive fungal infections and other pulmonary infections in paediatric cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, baseline HRCTs of patients with probable or proven invasive fungal infections and other pulmonary infections were blindly assessed by two radiologists, followed by a consensus reading. The scoring form included imaging characteristics and radiological invasive fungal infection probability assessment. Inter-rater reliability was determined with Cohen's kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chest HRCTs (n = 77) of paediatric cancer patients with pulmonary invasive fungal infections (n = 45) and with other pulmonary infections (n = 32) were evaluated. In the consensus reading, nodules with halo sign and wedge-shaped consolidations were observed significantly more in pulmonary invasive fungal infections than in other pulmonary infections (86.7% vs. 34.4% and 28.9% vs. 9.4%), and ground-glass opacities were observed less frequently (61.4% vs. 87.5%). The kappa values for the individual imaging characteristics ranged from 0.121 to 0.408. Sensitivity of the HRCT to diagnose a pulmonary invasive fungal infection ranged from 0.78 to 0.80, and specificity from 0.66 to 0.88.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The accuracy of chest HRCTs in differentiating between invasive fungal infections and other pulmonary infections is poor. There are two main reasons for this: no individual imaging characteristic was found to be able to fully distinguish between invasive fungal infections and other pulmonary infections, and the agreement between radiologists was only moderate.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"268-279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06112-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary invasive fungal infections pose a serious risk for immunocompromised patients. Although diagnostic imaging plays an important role in the early detection of pulmonary invasive fungal infections, radiological differentiation between invasive fungal infection and other pulmonary infections is challenging.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in the differentiation between pulmonary invasive fungal infections and other pulmonary infections in paediatric cancer patients.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, baseline HRCTs of patients with probable or proven invasive fungal infections and other pulmonary infections were blindly assessed by two radiologists, followed by a consensus reading. The scoring form included imaging characteristics and radiological invasive fungal infection probability assessment. Inter-rater reliability was determined with Cohen's kappa.

Results: Chest HRCTs (n = 77) of paediatric cancer patients with pulmonary invasive fungal infections (n = 45) and with other pulmonary infections (n = 32) were evaluated. In the consensus reading, nodules with halo sign and wedge-shaped consolidations were observed significantly more in pulmonary invasive fungal infections than in other pulmonary infections (86.7% vs. 34.4% and 28.9% vs. 9.4%), and ground-glass opacities were observed less frequently (61.4% vs. 87.5%). The kappa values for the individual imaging characteristics ranged from 0.121 to 0.408. Sensitivity of the HRCT to diagnose a pulmonary invasive fungal infection ranged from 0.78 to 0.80, and specificity from 0.66 to 0.88.

Conclusion: The accuracy of chest HRCTs in differentiating between invasive fungal infections and other pulmonary infections is poor. There are two main reasons for this: no individual imaging characteristic was found to be able to fully distinguish between invasive fungal infections and other pulmonary infections, and the agreement between radiologists was only moderate.

高分辨率胸部计算机断层扫描在鉴别癌症儿童肺部侵袭性真菌感染和其他肺部感染方面有多准确?
背景:肺部侵袭性真菌感染对免疫力低下的患者构成严重威胁。尽管影像诊断在早期发现肺部侵袭性真菌感染中发挥着重要作用,但从影像学角度区分侵袭性真菌感染和其他肺部感染具有挑战性:本研究旨在评估胸部高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)在区分儿科癌症患者肺部侵袭性真菌感染和其他肺部感染方面的准确性:在这项回顾性研究中,由两名放射科医生对可能或已证实有侵袭性真菌感染和其他肺部感染的患者的基线HRCT进行盲法评估,然后进行共识阅读。评分表包括影像学特征和放射学侵袭性真菌感染概率评估。用科恩卡帕法确定评分者之间的可靠性:对患有肺部侵袭性真菌感染(45 例)和其他肺部感染(32 例)的儿科癌症患者的胸部 HRCT(77 例)进行了评估。在共识读片中,肺部侵袭性真菌感染患者观察到的带晕轮征的结节和楔形合并症明显多于其他肺部感染患者(86.7% 对 34.4% 和 28.9% 对 9.4%),而观察到的磨玻璃不透明则较少(61.4% 对 87.5%)。各成像特征的卡帕值介于 0.121 到 0.408 之间。HRCT 诊断肺部侵袭性真菌感染的敏感性为 0.78 至 0.80,特异性为 0.66 至 0.88:胸部 HRCT 在区分侵袭性真菌感染和其他肺部感染方面的准确性较差。结论:胸部 HRCT 在区分侵袭性真菌感染和其他肺部感染方面的准确性较差,主要原因有两个:没有发现任何一种成像特征能够完全区分侵袭性真菌感染和其他肺部感染,而且放射科医生之间的一致性仅为中等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信