Mercedes de la Fuente, Isabel Mendizabal, Mira Han, Soojin V Yi, David Alvarez-Ponce
{"title":"Asymmetrical evolution of promoter methylation of mammalian genes after duplication.","authors":"Mercedes de la Fuente, Isabel Mendizabal, Mira Han, Soojin V Yi, David Alvarez-Ponce","doi":"10.1093/molbev/msae259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Even though gene duplication is a key source of new genes and evolutionary innovation, it is unclear how duplicates survive the period immediately following gene duplication, in which both copies are functionally redundant. In the absence of epigenetic silencing, the abundance of the gene product would double after gene duplication, which would often have deleterious effects. However, recent duplicates exhibit low expression levels, which could be at least partially explained by high levels of promoter methylation. What evolutionary paths lead to duplicate hypermethylation, and does it affect both duplicates, or only one? Here, we compare levels of promoter methylation in 10 human and 16 mouse tissues, between singletons and duplicates and among human-mouse orthologs of different kinds (one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-one, and many-to-many). Our results indicate that: (1) on average, duplicates are more methylated than singletons in mouse, but less methylated than singletons in human, (2) recently duplicated genes tend to exhibit high levels of promoter methylation, (3) genes that undergo duplication tend to be highly methylated before duplication, (4) after gene duplication, one of the copies (the daughter copy, i.e. the one that relocates to a new genomic context) tends to undergo an additional increase in promoter methylation, whereas the other (the parental copy, which remains in the original genomic location) tends to retain pre-duplication methylation levels, and (5) daughter copies tend to be lowly expressed. These observations support a model in which daughter copies are repressed via promoter hypermethylation and can thus survive the filter of purifying selection until both copies diverge functionally.</p>","PeriodicalId":18730,"journal":{"name":"Molecular biology and evolution","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular biology and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msae259","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Even though gene duplication is a key source of new genes and evolutionary innovation, it is unclear how duplicates survive the period immediately following gene duplication, in which both copies are functionally redundant. In the absence of epigenetic silencing, the abundance of the gene product would double after gene duplication, which would often have deleterious effects. However, recent duplicates exhibit low expression levels, which could be at least partially explained by high levels of promoter methylation. What evolutionary paths lead to duplicate hypermethylation, and does it affect both duplicates, or only one? Here, we compare levels of promoter methylation in 10 human and 16 mouse tissues, between singletons and duplicates and among human-mouse orthologs of different kinds (one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-one, and many-to-many). Our results indicate that: (1) on average, duplicates are more methylated than singletons in mouse, but less methylated than singletons in human, (2) recently duplicated genes tend to exhibit high levels of promoter methylation, (3) genes that undergo duplication tend to be highly methylated before duplication, (4) after gene duplication, one of the copies (the daughter copy, i.e. the one that relocates to a new genomic context) tends to undergo an additional increase in promoter methylation, whereas the other (the parental copy, which remains in the original genomic location) tends to retain pre-duplication methylation levels, and (5) daughter copies tend to be lowly expressed. These observations support a model in which daughter copies are repressed via promoter hypermethylation and can thus survive the filter of purifying selection until both copies diverge functionally.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Journal Overview:
Publishes research at the interface of molecular (including genomics) and evolutionary biology
Considers manuscripts containing patterns, processes, and predictions at all levels of organization: population, taxonomic, functional, and phenotypic
Interested in fundamental discoveries, new and improved methods, resources, technologies, and theories advancing evolutionary research
Publishes balanced reviews of recent developments in genome evolution and forward-looking perspectives suggesting future directions in molecular evolution applications.