Comparing survival and outcomes in isolated versus polytrauma-associated TBI: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Davide Corbella, Rosalia Zangari, Francesco Biroli, Stefano Magnone, Gaia Cavalleri, Maurizio Passoni, Svetlana Martchenko, Silvia Marchesi, Lucia Zacchetti, Francesco Ferri, Laura Urbaz, Marco Aliprandi, Luca F Lorini, Paolo Gritti
{"title":"Comparing survival and outcomes in isolated versus polytrauma-associated TBI: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Davide Corbella, Rosalia Zangari, Francesco Biroli, Stefano Magnone, Gaia Cavalleri, Maurizio Passoni, Svetlana Martchenko, Silvia Marchesi, Lucia Zacchetti, Francesco Ferri, Laura Urbaz, Marco Aliprandi, Luca F Lorini, Paolo Gritti","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.24.06287-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One in four patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) also has other body district injuries (OBD). The impact of OBD on mortality and disability is debated. This study compared outcomes of TBI patients with polytrauma (p-TBI) versus isolated TBI (alone-TBI) and identified outcome determinants, focusing on survival time and prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzed 193 patients with moderate to severe TBI admitted to an ICU from 2011 to 2012. Patients were divided into p-TBI and alone-TBI groups. Clinical, demographic, and outcome data were extracted from medical records. Key outcomes included survival time and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) scores at 1-year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The alone-TBI group (N.=126) was older with more comorbidities and higher use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant medications. The p-TBI group (N.=67) had greater physiological dysfunction (hypotension, acidosis, anemia, coagulopathy). Trauma severity (Glasgow Coma Scale), in-hospital mortality, and GOSE were similar between groups, but p-TBI patients had a shorter median survival time (3.5 vs. 18 days, P=0.016). Key determinants of poor outcomes were age, coagulopathy, neurological impairment at admission, and intracranial hypertension.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Polytrauma does not appear to be independently associated with the prognosis of moderate to severe TBI patients but is associated with earlier mortality. Coagulopathy and physiological instability are more critical factors in determining mortality and poor outcomes. Future research should explore whether polytrauma is a bystander in TBI or if it has a causal role in adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.24.06287-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One in four patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) also has other body district injuries (OBD). The impact of OBD on mortality and disability is debated. This study compared outcomes of TBI patients with polytrauma (p-TBI) versus isolated TBI (alone-TBI) and identified outcome determinants, focusing on survival time and prognosis.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzed 193 patients with moderate to severe TBI admitted to an ICU from 2011 to 2012. Patients were divided into p-TBI and alone-TBI groups. Clinical, demographic, and outcome data were extracted from medical records. Key outcomes included survival time and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) scores at 1-year.

Results: The alone-TBI group (N.=126) was older with more comorbidities and higher use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant medications. The p-TBI group (N.=67) had greater physiological dysfunction (hypotension, acidosis, anemia, coagulopathy). Trauma severity (Glasgow Coma Scale), in-hospital mortality, and GOSE were similar between groups, but p-TBI patients had a shorter median survival time (3.5 vs. 18 days, P=0.016). Key determinants of poor outcomes were age, coagulopathy, neurological impairment at admission, and intracranial hypertension.

Conclusions: Polytrauma does not appear to be independently associated with the prognosis of moderate to severe TBI patients but is associated with earlier mortality. Coagulopathy and physiological instability are more critical factors in determining mortality and poor outcomes. Future research should explore whether polytrauma is a bystander in TBI or if it has a causal role in adverse outcomes.

比较孤立性创伤性脑损伤与多发性创伤性脑损伤的存活率和预后:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:四分之一的中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者同时伴有其他体区损伤(OBD)。OBD对死亡率和残疾的影响是有争议的。本研究比较了多发创伤(p-TBI)和孤立性TBI(单独TBI)患者的结果,并确定了结果的决定因素,重点是生存时间和预后。方法:这项单中心、回顾性队列研究分析了2011年至2012年ICU收治的193例中重度TBI患者。患者分为p-TBI组和单纯tbi组。从医疗记录中提取临床、人口统计学和结局数据。主要结局包括1年时的生存时间和格拉斯哥结局量表扩展(GOSE)评分。结果:单纯tbi组(126例)患者年龄较大,合并症较多,抗血小板/抗凝药物使用率较高。p-TBI组(n =67)有较大的生理功能障碍(低血压、酸中毒、贫血、凝血功能障碍)。创伤严重程度(格拉斯哥昏迷量表)、住院死亡率和GOSE在两组之间相似,但P - tbi患者的中位生存时间较短(3.5天对18天,P=0.016)。不良预后的关键决定因素是年龄、凝血功能障碍、入院时神经损伤和颅内高压。结论:多发创伤似乎与中重度TBI患者的预后无关,但与早期死亡率相关。凝血功能障碍和生理不稳定是决定死亡率和不良预后的更关键因素。未来的研究应该探讨多发创伤是否是创伤性脑损伤的旁观者,或者它是否在不良后果中起因果作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信