Papillary and ductal patterns of mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas are often overlooked: a retrospective revaluation of over 1000 endometrial carcinomas.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Histopathology Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1111/his.15393
Ardalan Akbari, Jennifer Pors, Amy Lum, Samuel Leung, Dawn Cochrane, Amy Jamieson, Jessica McAlpine, Stefan Kommoss, Jutta Huvila, David Huntsman, Aline Talhouk, Naveena Singh, C Blake Gilks, Lynn Hoang
{"title":"Papillary and ductal patterns of mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas are often overlooked: a retrospective revaluation of over 1000 endometrial carcinomas.","authors":"Ardalan Akbari, Jennifer Pors, Amy Lum, Samuel Leung, Dawn Cochrane, Amy Jamieson, Jessica McAlpine, Stefan Kommoss, Jutta Huvila, David Huntsman, Aline Talhouk, Naveena Singh, C Blake Gilks, Lynn Hoang","doi":"10.1111/his.15393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) of the endometrium is often a diagnostic challenge, due to its morphological resemblance to other more common Müllerian neoplasms. This study aimed to retrospectively identify overlooked MLA in a large endometrial carcinoma cohort, using a combination of immunohistochemistry (IHC), morphology and KRAS sequencing.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>IHC was conducted on 1094 endometrial carcinomas, identifying 16 potential MLA cases based on GATA3+ and/or TTF1+ and ER- staining patterns, which subsequently underwent detailed histological review, KRAS sequencing and ProMisE molecular classification. Of the IHC screen-positive cases, one was positive for both GATA3 and TTF1, nine were positive for GATA3 only and six were positive for TTF1 only. All IHC screen-positive cases were POLE wild-type. All five tumours in the NSMP category showed morphological features of MLA, while the three MMRd and eight p53abn tumours did not show MLA morphology. The five cases diagnosed as MLA on review were all originally diagnosed as low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma probably because of rare morphological patterns, being predominantly papillary or ductal. Four of the five cases harboured a KRAS mutation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the importance of a comprehensive diagnostic approach for accurately identifying endometrial MLA and for pathologists to be aware of papillary and ductal patterns in endometrial carcinoma assessment. Further exploration into the molecular landscape of MLA is essential for refining diagnostic criteria and developing targeted therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13219,"journal":{"name":"Histopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/his.15393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) of the endometrium is often a diagnostic challenge, due to its morphological resemblance to other more common Müllerian neoplasms. This study aimed to retrospectively identify overlooked MLA in a large endometrial carcinoma cohort, using a combination of immunohistochemistry (IHC), morphology and KRAS sequencing.

Methods and results: IHC was conducted on 1094 endometrial carcinomas, identifying 16 potential MLA cases based on GATA3+ and/or TTF1+ and ER- staining patterns, which subsequently underwent detailed histological review, KRAS sequencing and ProMisE molecular classification. Of the IHC screen-positive cases, one was positive for both GATA3 and TTF1, nine were positive for GATA3 only and six were positive for TTF1 only. All IHC screen-positive cases were POLE wild-type. All five tumours in the NSMP category showed morphological features of MLA, while the three MMRd and eight p53abn tumours did not show MLA morphology. The five cases diagnosed as MLA on review were all originally diagnosed as low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma probably because of rare morphological patterns, being predominantly papillary or ductal. Four of the five cases harboured a KRAS mutation.

Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of a comprehensive diagnostic approach for accurately identifying endometrial MLA and for pathologists to be aware of papillary and ductal patterns in endometrial carcinoma assessment. Further exploration into the molecular landscape of MLA is essential for refining diagnostic criteria and developing targeted therapies.

中肾样腺癌的乳头状和导管型常被忽视:1000多例子宫内膜癌的回顾性评估。
目的:子宫内膜中肾样腺癌(MLA)通常是一个诊断挑战,因为它的形态与其他更常见的勒氏肿瘤相似。本研究旨在利用免疫组织化学(IHC)、形态学和KRAS测序相结合的方法,回顾性地确定一个大型子宫内膜癌队列中被忽视的MLA。方法和结果:对1094例子宫内膜癌进行免疫组化,根据GATA3+和/或TTF1+和ER-染色模式确定16例潜在的MLA病例,随后进行详细的组织学检查、KRAS测序和ProMisE分子分类。在IHC筛查阳性病例中,1例GATA3和TTF1均阳性,9例GATA3仅阳性,6例TTF1仅阳性。所有IHC筛查阳性病例均为POLE野生型。5例NSMP肿瘤均表现出MLA的形态学特征,而3例MMRd和8例p53abn肿瘤未表现出MLA形态学特征。5例被诊断为MLA的病例最初都被诊断为低级别子宫内膜样腺癌,可能是因为罕见的形态模式,主要是乳头状或导管状。五个病例中有四个携带KRAS突变。结论:本研究强调了综合诊断方法对准确识别子宫内膜MLA的重要性,以及病理学家在子宫内膜癌评估中了解乳头状和导管模式的重要性。进一步探索MLA的分子景观对于完善诊断标准和开发靶向治疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Histopathology
Histopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
239
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Histopathology is an international journal intended to be of practical value to surgical and diagnostic histopathologists, and to investigators of human disease who employ histopathological methods. Our primary purpose is to publish advances in pathology, in particular those applicable to clinical practice and contributing to the better understanding of human disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信