Wafa Hourani, Pran Kishore Deb, Maysa Alhawamdeh, Nizar Al-Shari, Pobitra Borah, Lina A Dahabiyeh, Abdulmuttaleb Yousef Jaber, Nefisath P, Shashiprabha S, Jagadeesh Prasad Dasappa, Katharigatta N Venugopala
{"title":"Anticancer and Cyclooxygenase Inhibitory Activity of Benzylidene Derivatives of Fenobam and its Thio Analogues.","authors":"Wafa Hourani, Pran Kishore Deb, Maysa Alhawamdeh, Nizar Al-Shari, Pobitra Borah, Lina A Dahabiyeh, Abdulmuttaleb Yousef Jaber, Nefisath P, Shashiprabha S, Jagadeesh Prasad Dasappa, Katharigatta N Venugopala","doi":"10.2174/0109298673345068241120045638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A series of benzylidene derivatives of fenobam and its thio analogues (1-22) have been evaluated for their cytotoxicity against breast cancer (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231), ovarian cancer (A2780, SKOV-3) and cervical cancer (HELA) cell lines.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>These compounds (1-22) exhibited 72-83% inhibition of Erk activity against the ovarian cancer cell line (A2780). Compounds 3 and 20 showed the highest DNA damage effect in Comet Assay against the A2780 cancer cell line as compared to the other tested analogues (4, 8, 11, 12, and 13) by using % Tail DNA and OTM. Compounds 3, 4, and 11 showed significant activities and selectivity towards COX-2 with 78%, 97%, and 89% inhibition, as compared to 17%, 57%, and 26% inhibition against COX-1 isoenzyme, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interestingly, molecular docking scores were also in very good agreement with the experimental results regarding discriminating the selectivity index of the tested compounds against COX-1 & COX-2 enzymes. Further molecular dynamics (MD) simulation study revealed that the most selective compound, 13, binds with the COX-2 enzyme in a similar fashion to that of Rofecoxib, which was further supported by their MD-based free binding energies (MM-GBSA) of -49.76 ± 4.27 kcal/mol, and -44.84 ±3.78 kcal/mol, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moreover, in silico ADMET predictions showed adequate properties for these compounds, making them promising leads worthy of further optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":10984,"journal":{"name":"Current medicinal chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current medicinal chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0109298673345068241120045638","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: A series of benzylidene derivatives of fenobam and its thio analogues (1-22) have been evaluated for their cytotoxicity against breast cancer (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231), ovarian cancer (A2780, SKOV-3) and cervical cancer (HELA) cell lines.
Method: These compounds (1-22) exhibited 72-83% inhibition of Erk activity against the ovarian cancer cell line (A2780). Compounds 3 and 20 showed the highest DNA damage effect in Comet Assay against the A2780 cancer cell line as compared to the other tested analogues (4, 8, 11, 12, and 13) by using % Tail DNA and OTM. Compounds 3, 4, and 11 showed significant activities and selectivity towards COX-2 with 78%, 97%, and 89% inhibition, as compared to 17%, 57%, and 26% inhibition against COX-1 isoenzyme, respectively.
Results: Interestingly, molecular docking scores were also in very good agreement with the experimental results regarding discriminating the selectivity index of the tested compounds against COX-1 & COX-2 enzymes. Further molecular dynamics (MD) simulation study revealed that the most selective compound, 13, binds with the COX-2 enzyme in a similar fashion to that of Rofecoxib, which was further supported by their MD-based free binding energies (MM-GBSA) of -49.76 ± 4.27 kcal/mol, and -44.84 ±3.78 kcal/mol, respectively.
Conclusion: Moreover, in silico ADMET predictions showed adequate properties for these compounds, making them promising leads worthy of further optimization.
期刊介绍:
Aims & Scope
Current Medicinal Chemistry covers all the latest and outstanding developments in medicinal chemistry and rational drug design. Each issue contains a series of timely in-depth reviews and guest edited thematic issues written by leaders in the field covering a range of the current topics in medicinal chemistry. The journal also publishes reviews on recent patents. Current Medicinal Chemistry is an essential journal for every medicinal chemist who wishes to be kept informed and up-to-date with the latest and most important developments.