Accuracy of frameless robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography depth electrode implantation using the neurolocate registration system in paediatric patients.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Arthur R Kurzbuch, Maria R Scala, Ben Cooper, John Kitchen, Volker Tronnier, Jonathan Ellenbogen
{"title":"Accuracy of frameless robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography depth electrode implantation using the neurolocate registration system in paediatric patients.","authors":"Arthur R Kurzbuch, Maria R Scala, Ben Cooper, John Kitchen, Volker Tronnier, Jonathan Ellenbogen","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2024.2441268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We assessed the accuracy and performed a directional analysis of robot-assisted implantation of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) depth electrodes in children using the frameless neurolocate 3D registration module.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen children with epilepsy undergoing stereotactic robot-assisted insertion of SEEG electrodes were included. Six children were operated on with standard frame-based registration while 7 with the use of the frameless neurolocate registration module. Accuracy and directional analysis of orthogonal and oblique electrodes were assessed by calculating the absolute error, the radial error, the angle error, and the Euclidean distance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 172 electrodes 89 were implanted in the 6 standard frame-based mode patients and 83 in the 7 neurolocate patients. The overall mean age was 12.2 ± 4.4 years (range 2-17). The mean number of electrodes in each patient was 13.2 ± 2.04 (range 9-17). The median radial error of electrode placement in the neurolocate patients (1.08 mm, [IQR: 1.26]) was significantly less when compared with standard frame-based mode patients (1.49 mm, [IQR 1.25)]; <i>p</i> = 0.04). The same applies to the median angle error which was in the neurolocate group 1.61° [IQR: 1.46] and in the standard frame-based group 2.16° [IQR: 2.09]; <i>p</i> = 0.019. Directional analysis of electrode trajectories in the neurolocate group showed that in the x-axis the median absolute error of orthogonal electrodes (0.4 mm, [IQR: 0.475]) was less when compared with oblique electrodes (0.7 mm, [IQR: 1.2]; <i>p</i> = 0.007). In the standard frame-based mode group in the y-axis, the median absolute error of orthogonal electrodes (0.7 mm, [IQR: 1.3]) was less compared with oblique electrodes (1.25 mm, [IQR: 1.6]; <i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In paediatric patients, robot-assisted SEEG depth electrode implantation with the non-invasive and easy-to-use frameless neurolocate registration module is a consistent and accurate procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2024.2441268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We assessed the accuracy and performed a directional analysis of robot-assisted implantation of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) depth electrodes in children using the frameless neurolocate 3D registration module.

Methods: Thirteen children with epilepsy undergoing stereotactic robot-assisted insertion of SEEG electrodes were included. Six children were operated on with standard frame-based registration while 7 with the use of the frameless neurolocate registration module. Accuracy and directional analysis of orthogonal and oblique electrodes were assessed by calculating the absolute error, the radial error, the angle error, and the Euclidean distance.

Results: Of 172 electrodes 89 were implanted in the 6 standard frame-based mode patients and 83 in the 7 neurolocate patients. The overall mean age was 12.2 ± 4.4 years (range 2-17). The mean number of electrodes in each patient was 13.2 ± 2.04 (range 9-17). The median radial error of electrode placement in the neurolocate patients (1.08 mm, [IQR: 1.26]) was significantly less when compared with standard frame-based mode patients (1.49 mm, [IQR 1.25)]; p = 0.04). The same applies to the median angle error which was in the neurolocate group 1.61° [IQR: 1.46] and in the standard frame-based group 2.16° [IQR: 2.09]; p = 0.019. Directional analysis of electrode trajectories in the neurolocate group showed that in the x-axis the median absolute error of orthogonal electrodes (0.4 mm, [IQR: 0.475]) was less when compared with oblique electrodes (0.7 mm, [IQR: 1.2]; p = 0.007). In the standard frame-based mode group in the y-axis, the median absolute error of orthogonal electrodes (0.7 mm, [IQR: 1.3]) was less compared with oblique electrodes (1.25 mm, [IQR: 1.6]; p = 0.03).

Conclusion: In paediatric patients, robot-assisted SEEG depth electrode implantation with the non-invasive and easy-to-use frameless neurolocate registration module is a consistent and accurate procedure.

无框架机器人辅助立体脑电图深度电极植入在儿童患者中应用神经定位登记系统的准确性。
背景:我们评估了机器人辅助植入儿童立体脑电图(SEEG)深度电极的准确性并进行了定向分析,该电极采用无框架神经定位3D定位模块。方法:13例癫痫患儿接受立体定向机器人辅助SEEG电极植入。6例患儿采用标准框架配准,7例患儿采用无框架神经定位配准模块。通过计算绝对误差、径向误差、角度误差和欧氏距离,对正交和斜向电极的精度和定向分析进行了评价。结果:172个电极中有89个植入6例标准框架模式患者,83个植入7例神经定位患者。总平均年龄12.2±4.4岁(范围2-17岁)。每位患者平均电极数为13.2±2.04(范围9-17)。神经定位患者电极放置的中位径向误差(1.08 mm, [IQR: 1.26])明显小于标准框架模式患者(1.49 mm, [IQR: 1.25);p = 0.04)。神经定位组的中位角误差为1.61°[IQR: 1.46],标准框架组的中位角误差为2.16°[IQR: 2.09];p = 0.019。神经定位组电极轨迹的定向分析显示,在x轴上,正交电极(0.4 mm, [IQR: 0.475])的中位数绝对误差小于斜电极(0.7 mm, [IQR: 1.2]);p = 0.007)。在y轴标准框架模式组中,正交电极(0.7 mm, [IQR: 1.3])的中位绝对误差小于斜电极(1.25 mm, [IQR: 1.6]);p = 0.03)。结论:在儿童患者中,机器人辅助SEEG深度电极植入无创且易于使用的无框神经定位注册模块是一种一致且准确的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Neurosurgery
British Journal of Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide. Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信