Efficacy of Clinical Tests in the Diagnosis of Meralgia Paresthetica: A Case Control Study.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Case Reports in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/carm/5191280
Shasthara Paneyala, Nemichandra S Chandrashekhar, Harsha Sundaramurthy, Akila Prashant, Lakshmi Krishna
{"title":"Efficacy of Clinical Tests in the Diagnosis of Meralgia Paresthetica: A Case Control Study.","authors":"Shasthara Paneyala, Nemichandra S Chandrashekhar, Harsha Sundaramurthy, Akila Prashant, Lakshmi Krishna","doi":"10.1155/carm/5191280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Meralgia paresthetica (MP), a common entrapment syndrome, presents with paresthesias in the anterolateral aspect of the thigh. Clinical tests used to diagnose MP are the pelvic compression test, neurodynamic testing, and Tinel's sign. The diagnostic accuracy of these three tests has not been analyzed to date. Hence, this study aims to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of these clinical tests. <b>Case Study:</b> This study was a hospital-based case-control study that included 30 electrophysiologically proven patients with MP. The data were gathered over a period of 6 months after obtaining institutional ethics committee clearance. Demographics and risk factors among our cases are in keeping with the global scenario. The sensitivity and specificity of the pelvic compression test were 86.7% and 93.0%, the Tinsel sign was 85.1% and 87.5%, and neurodynamic testing was 86.7% and 93.0%, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our study proves that these tests are a simple and accurate aid in the diagnosis of MP. These bedside clinical tests can be utilized to establish a diagnosis of MP in a setting of conflicting differentials such as lumbar canal stenosis or thoracolumbar junction disc pathologies and guide in choosing the next line of investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9627,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Medicine","volume":"2024 ","pages":"5191280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/carm/5191280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Meralgia paresthetica (MP), a common entrapment syndrome, presents with paresthesias in the anterolateral aspect of the thigh. Clinical tests used to diagnose MP are the pelvic compression test, neurodynamic testing, and Tinel's sign. The diagnostic accuracy of these three tests has not been analyzed to date. Hence, this study aims to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of these clinical tests. Case Study: This study was a hospital-based case-control study that included 30 electrophysiologically proven patients with MP. The data were gathered over a period of 6 months after obtaining institutional ethics committee clearance. Demographics and risk factors among our cases are in keeping with the global scenario. The sensitivity and specificity of the pelvic compression test were 86.7% and 93.0%, the Tinsel sign was 85.1% and 87.5%, and neurodynamic testing was 86.7% and 93.0%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study proves that these tests are a simple and accurate aid in the diagnosis of MP. These bedside clinical tests can be utilized to establish a diagnosis of MP in a setting of conflicting differentials such as lumbar canal stenosis or thoracolumbar junction disc pathologies and guide in choosing the next line of investigation.

背景:感觉异常Meralgia (MP)是一种常见的卡压综合征,表现为大腿前外侧的感觉异常。用于诊断MP的临床试验有盆腔压迫试验、神经动力学试验和Tinel征象。迄今为止,尚未对这三种测试的诊断准确性进行分析。因此,本研究旨在分析这些临床试验的敏感性和特异性。病例研究:本研究是一项以医院为基础的病例对照研究,包括30例经电生理学证实的MP患者。这些数据是在获得机构伦理委员会许可后的6个月内收集的。我们病例中的人口统计和风险因素与全球情况一致。盆腔压缩试验的敏感性和特异性分别为86.7%和93.0%,Tinsel征像的敏感性和特异性分别为85.1%和87.5%,神经动力学试验的敏感性和特异性分别为86.7%和93.0%。结论:本研究证明这些检测方法对MP的诊断是一种简单、准确的辅助手段。这些床边临床试验可用于在腰椎管狭窄或胸腰椎交界盘病变等相互冲突的鉴别诊断中建立MP的诊断,并指导选择下一步的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Case Reports in Medicine
Case Reports in Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信