The relationship between baseline BMD and fracture incidence in the placebo groups of RCTs using individual patient data from the FNIH-ASBMR-SABRE Project.

IF 5.1 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Marian Schini, Li-Yung Lui, Tatiane Vilaca, Susan K Ewing, Austin Thompson, Douglas C Bauer, Mary L Bouxsein, Dennis M Black, Richard Eastell
{"title":"The relationship between baseline BMD and fracture incidence in the placebo groups of RCTs using individual patient data from the FNIH-ASBMR-SABRE Project.","authors":"Marian Schini, Li-Yung Lui, Tatiane Vilaca, Susan K Ewing, Austin Thompson, Douglas C Bauer, Mary L Bouxsein, Dennis M Black, Richard Eastell","doi":"10.1093/jbmr/zjae201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have proposed to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that treatment-related increases in total hip bone mineral density (TH BMD) at two years could be a surrogate endpoint for fracture risk reduction in clinical trials. The qualification of a surrogate includes a strong association of the surrogate with the clinical outcome. We compiled a large database of individual patient data (IPD) through the FNIH-ASBMR-SABRE project, and this analysis aimed to assess the relationship between baseline BMD and fracture risk in the placebo groups. We estimated the association of baseline TH, femoral neck (FN) and lumbar spine (LS) BMD with fracture risk using IPD from the combined placebo groups which included data from 46 666 placebo participants in 25 randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We estimated the relative risk (RR) of fracture per standard deviation (SD) decrease in baseline BMD using logistic regression models for radiographic vertebral fractures and proportional hazards models for hip, non-vertebral, \"all\" and \"all clinical\" fractures. Total person-years in the combined placebo groups was 250 662 (mean baseline age 70.2 ± 7.2 years, mean TH BMD T-score -1.97 ± 0.90). We observed significant relationships between baseline TH BMD and vertebral (RR = 1.55/SD), hip (RR = 2.27), non-vertebral (RR = 1.31), all (RR = 1.43) and all clinical (RR = 1.35) fracture risk. Fracture risk estimates were similar for FN BMD and after adjustment for age, race and study. Fracture incidence increased with decreasing TH BMD quintile, confirming the strong graded association between TH BMD and fracture risk. There was a strong relationship between LS BMD and vertebral fracture risk (RR = 1.56/SD), but only a weak association with non-vertebral (RR = 1.07) and no association with hip (RR = 1.01) fracture risk. These data support the very strong relationship between hip BMD and fracture risk and provide supporting rationale for change in TH BMD as a surrogate for fracture risk reduction in future RCTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjae201","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have proposed to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that treatment-related increases in total hip bone mineral density (TH BMD) at two years could be a surrogate endpoint for fracture risk reduction in clinical trials. The qualification of a surrogate includes a strong association of the surrogate with the clinical outcome. We compiled a large database of individual patient data (IPD) through the FNIH-ASBMR-SABRE project, and this analysis aimed to assess the relationship between baseline BMD and fracture risk in the placebo groups. We estimated the association of baseline TH, femoral neck (FN) and lumbar spine (LS) BMD with fracture risk using IPD from the combined placebo groups which included data from 46 666 placebo participants in 25 randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We estimated the relative risk (RR) of fracture per standard deviation (SD) decrease in baseline BMD using logistic regression models for radiographic vertebral fractures and proportional hazards models for hip, non-vertebral, "all" and "all clinical" fractures. Total person-years in the combined placebo groups was 250 662 (mean baseline age 70.2 ± 7.2 years, mean TH BMD T-score -1.97 ± 0.90). We observed significant relationships between baseline TH BMD and vertebral (RR = 1.55/SD), hip (RR = 2.27), non-vertebral (RR = 1.31), all (RR = 1.43) and all clinical (RR = 1.35) fracture risk. Fracture risk estimates were similar for FN BMD and after adjustment for age, race and study. Fracture incidence increased with decreasing TH BMD quintile, confirming the strong graded association between TH BMD and fracture risk. There was a strong relationship between LS BMD and vertebral fracture risk (RR = 1.56/SD), but only a weak association with non-vertebral (RR = 1.07) and no association with hip (RR = 1.01) fracture risk. These data support the very strong relationship between hip BMD and fracture risk and provide supporting rationale for change in TH BMD as a surrogate for fracture risk reduction in future RCTs.

利用 FNIH-ASBMR-SABRE 项目中的单个患者数据,研究性试验安慰剂组中基线 BMD 与骨折发生率之间的关系。
我们已经向美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)提出,治疗相关的两年内髋部总骨密度(TH BMD)的增加可以作为临床试验中骨折风险降低的替代终点。代孕的资格包括代孕与临床结果的强烈关联。我们通过FNIH-ASBMR-SABRE项目编制了一个大型的个体患者数据(IPD)数据库,该分析旨在评估安慰剂组的基线骨密度与骨折风险之间的关系。我们使用联合安慰剂组的IPD估计基线TH、股骨颈(FN)和腰椎(LS)骨密度与骨折风险的关联,其中包括25项随机对照试验(RCTs)中46 666名安慰剂参与者的数据。我们使用影像学椎体骨折的logistic回归模型和髋部、非椎体、“全部”和“全部临床”骨折的比例风险模型,估计基线骨密度每标准差(SD)降低的骨折相对风险(RR)。联合安慰剂组的总人年为250662人(平均基线年龄70.2±7.2岁,平均TH BMD t -评分-1.97±0.90)。我们观察到基线TH BMD与椎体骨折(RR = 1.55/SD)、髋部骨折(RR = 2.27)、非椎体骨折(RR = 1.31)、所有骨折(RR = 1.43)和所有临床骨折(RR = 1.35)风险之间存在显著关系。FN骨密度和年龄、种族和研究调整后的骨折风险估计值相似。骨折发生率随着TH骨密度的降低而增加,证实了TH骨密度与骨折风险之间有很强的分级关联。LS骨密度与椎体骨折风险相关性较强(RR = 1.56/SD),与非椎体骨折风险相关性较弱(RR = 1.07),与髋部骨折风险无相关性(RR = 1.01)。这些数据支持了髋部骨密度与骨折风险之间的密切关系,并为在未来的随机对照试验中,改变髋部骨密度作为降低骨折风险的替代指标提供了支持的理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
257
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (JBMR) publishes highly impactful original manuscripts, reviews, and special articles on basic, translational and clinical investigations relevant to the musculoskeletal system and mineral metabolism. Specifically, the journal is interested in original research on the biology and physiology of skeletal tissues, interdisciplinary research spanning the musculoskeletal and other systems, including but not limited to immunology, hematology, energy metabolism, cancer biology, and neurology, and systems biology topics using large scale “-omics” approaches. The journal welcomes clinical research on the pathophysiology, treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and fractures, as well as sarcopenia, disorders of bone and mineral metabolism, and rare or genetically determined bone diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信