Effect of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Pre-Treatment on Outcomes of Fresh and Frozen Embryo Transfers in Women With Adenomyosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Literature Review

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Xin Li, Yixin Li, Hexiang Peng, Mengying Wang, Yuqi Liu, Tao Wu, Qing Xue
{"title":"Effect of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Pre-Treatment on Outcomes of Fresh and Frozen Embryo Transfers in Women With Adenomyosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Literature Review","authors":"Xin Li,&nbsp;Yixin Li,&nbsp;Hexiang Peng,&nbsp;Mengying Wang,&nbsp;Yuqi Liu,&nbsp;Tao Wu,&nbsp;Qing Xue","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) pre-treatment on the clinical outcomes of fresh and frozen embryo transfers (ETs and FETs, respectively) in infertile patients with adenomyosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective cohort study with literature review.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Peking University First Hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>We analysed 413 cycles of 369 women with adenomyosis who underwent ETs or FETs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed logistic regression analysis and meta-analysis to assess the association of GnRHa pre-treatment with the clinical outcomes of ETs and FETs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>The live birth rate (LBR) was compared between patients with and without GnRHa pre-treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The LBR was higher in the GnRHa pre-treatment group than in the non-GnRHa pre-treatment group in ETs (41.27% vs. 24.32%, <i>p</i> = 0.034) and FETs (40.36% vs. 20.75%, <i>p</i> = 0.008). The odds of achieving a live birth of women with GnRHa pre-treatment were 2.65 times higher than that of those without (95% CI: 1.19–5.92, <i>p</i> = 0.017) after adjusting for confounders in ETs. Similarly, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 2.43 (95% CI: 1.10–5.40, <i>p</i> = 0.029) in FETs. For the meta-analysis, eight studies met the inclusion criteria; however, only six reported the adjusted ORs. Combination of these six adjusted ORs with our results revealed that the GnRHa pre-treatment group had higher LBRs than the non-GnRHa pre-treatment group (ET: OR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.30–2.26, FET: OR 2.61, 95% CI: 1.52–4.49).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In women with adenomyosis, GnRHa pre-treatment may be beneficial for LBRs following both ETs and FETs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 S2","pages":"62-74"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) pre-treatment on the clinical outcomes of fresh and frozen embryo transfers (ETs and FETs, respectively) in infertile patients with adenomyosis.

Design

Retrospective cohort study with literature review.

Setting

Peking University First Hospital.

Population

We analysed 413 cycles of 369 women with adenomyosis who underwent ETs or FETs.

Methods

We performed logistic regression analysis and meta-analysis to assess the association of GnRHa pre-treatment with the clinical outcomes of ETs and FETs.

Main Outcome Measures

The live birth rate (LBR) was compared between patients with and without GnRHa pre-treatment.

Results

The LBR was higher in the GnRHa pre-treatment group than in the non-GnRHa pre-treatment group in ETs (41.27% vs. 24.32%, p = 0.034) and FETs (40.36% vs. 20.75%, p = 0.008). The odds of achieving a live birth of women with GnRHa pre-treatment were 2.65 times higher than that of those without (95% CI: 1.19–5.92, p = 0.017) after adjusting for confounders in ETs. Similarly, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 2.43 (95% CI: 1.10–5.40, p = 0.029) in FETs. For the meta-analysis, eight studies met the inclusion criteria; however, only six reported the adjusted ORs. Combination of these six adjusted ORs with our results revealed that the GnRHa pre-treatment group had higher LBRs than the non-GnRHa pre-treatment group (ET: OR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.30–2.26, FET: OR 2.61, 95% CI: 1.52–4.49).

Conclusions

In women with adenomyosis, GnRHa pre-treatment may be beneficial for LBRs following both ETs and FETs.

促性腺激素释放激素激动剂预处理对子宫腺肌症女性新鲜和冷冻胚胎移植结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究并文献综述
目的:研究促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)预处理对子宫腺肌症不孕患者新鲜胚胎移植(ET)和冷冻胚胎移植(FET)临床结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信