Response to the Letter to the Editor by Athinarayanan

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Pub Date : 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1002/oby.24191
Jaime P. Almandoz, Thomas A. Wadden, Colleen Tewksbury, Caroline M. Apovian, Angela Fitch, Jamy D. Ard, Zhaoping Li, Jesse Richards, W. Scott Butsch, Irina Jouravskaya, Kadie S. Vanderman, Lisa M. Neff
{"title":"Response to the Letter to the Editor by Athinarayanan","authors":"Jaime P. Almandoz,&nbsp;Thomas A. Wadden,&nbsp;Colleen Tewksbury,&nbsp;Caroline M. Apovian,&nbsp;Angela Fitch,&nbsp;Jamy D. Ard,&nbsp;Zhaoping Li,&nbsp;Jesse Richards,&nbsp;W. Scott Butsch,&nbsp;Irina Jouravskaya,&nbsp;Kadie S. Vanderman,&nbsp;Lisa M. Neff","doi":"10.1002/oby.24191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>TO THE EDITOR:</b> We thank Dr. Athinarayanan for her interest in our review [<span>(1)</span>] and appreciate the opportunity to respond.</p><p>We agree that patients face many challenges maintaining long-term body weight reduction, including widespread misconceptions regarding the long-term effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for obesity, along with the body's physiological response to weight loss, which can lead to reduced energy expenditure and increased appetite [<span>(2)</span>]. Limited access to treatment is also a barrier to successful long-term weight management [<span>(3)</span>]. However, we dispute Dr. Athinarayanan's suggestion that dietary carbohydrate restriction (or any other lifestyle intervention) is a proven, effective strategy for weight maintenance after treatment with antiobesity medications (AOMs). Evidence from numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) shows that, even with ongoing lifestyle counseling, weight regain is typically observed after AOM cessation [<span>(1)</span>]. Accordingly, long-term use of pharmacotherapy is recommended for weight maintenance [<span>(1)</span>]; therefore, weight management after deprescription was outside of the scope of our review.</p><p>Our review recommended a variety of healthy dietary patterns for patients treated with AOMs and highlighted the importance of individualized lifestyle goals. A low-carbohydrate diet was not excluded from our recommendations, and we provided guidance for clinicians whose patients prefer this dietary pattern. However, when considering the potential impacts of dietary patterns on long-term health outcomes such as cardiovascular disease and mortality, there is more evidence to support a recommendation for moderate-carbohydrate dietary patterns such as the Mediterranean and healthy plant-based diets [<span>(1, 4)</span>]. Indeed, we feel that the strength of the evidence to specifically recommend a low-carbohydrate dietary pattern is low. The carbohydrate-insulin model is an interesting but controversial theoretical model that is challenged by scientific evidence that supports alternate theories of obesity pathophysiology [<span>(2, 5)</span>]. As evidence of the efficacy of low-carbohydrate dietary patterns on weight maintenance, Dr. Athinarayanan cites nonrandomized studies, including a report from the National Weight Control Registry, a prospective cohort study of individuals who, prior to study entry, had maintained a weight reduction of at least 30 lb for 1 year or more. Of note, only 11% of registry participants reported losing weight with a low-carbohydrate dietary approach [<span>(6)</span>]. We appreciate the work of Dr. Athinarayanan and colleagues, which includes descriptive, nonrandomized studies of outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes who self-selected a telehealth-based continuous care program leveraging a low-carbohydrate dietary pattern [<span>(7, 8)</span>]. We also appreciate their recent retrospective analysis of the impact of deprescription of glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist therapy for type 2 diabetes on weight maintenance in a subset of these program participants [<span>(9)</span>]. Additional RCTs are needed to rigorously evaluate the efficacy of different lifestyle interventions, including a low-carbohydrate approach, after AOM deprescription. However, we anticipate that weight regain would occur, as has been observed previously in numerous trials, because obesity is a chronic and relapsing disease [<span>(1)</span>].</p><p>In summary, we agree that dietary recommendations should be personalized for patients treated with AOMs and recognize that, for select patients, a low-carbohydrate dietary pattern may be preferred; however, we are unable to specifically recommend a low-carbohydrate dietary pattern over other dietary patterns. Given the wealth of evidence from RCTs that weight regain is typical after AOM cessation, even with continued lifestyle counseling, we support efforts to optimize long-term access to evidence-based obesity care.</p><p>Jaime P. Almandoz has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, and Novo Nordisk A/S; received payment or honoraria for lectures from Clinical Care Options, the Institute for Medical and Nursing Education, and PeerView; and served in a leadership or fiduciary role with The Obesity Society Governing Board. Thomas A. Wadden has received consulting fees from Novo Nordisk A/S and WW International, Inc. (formerly Weight Watchers). Colleen Tewksbury has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and the Commission on Dietetic Registration; received support for attending meetings and/or travel from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; served in a leadership or fiduciary role for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Weight Management Dietetic Practice Group Executive Committee; and served as a spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Caroline M. Apovian has received institutional grants from GI Dynamics Inc. (now Morphic Medical), Novo Nordisk A/S, and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; received consulting fees from Cowen and Company, LLC; received payment or honoraria for lectures from Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; participated on advisory boards for Altimmune, CinFina Pharma, Currax Pharmaceuticals, EPG Communication Holdings, Form Health, L-Nutra, NeuroBo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, PainScript, Palatin Technologies, Inc., Pursuit By You, ReShape Lifesciences, Inc., Riverview School, and Roman Health Ventures Inc.; served in a leadership or fiduciary role with the World Obesity Federation; and received stock or stock options from Gelesis and Xeno Biosciences. Angela Fitch has received consulting fees from Eli Lilly and Company, Jenny Craig, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sidekick Health, and Vivus; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Novo Nordisk A/S; received payment for expert testimony from the state of Massachusetts; received support for attending meetings and/or travel from the Obesity Medicine Association and Pfizer Inc.; served in a leadership or fiduciary role with the Obesity Medicine Association; and received stock or stock options from Eli Lilly and Company and Novo Nordisk A/S. Jamy D. Ard has received grants or contracts from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Epitomee, KVK Tech, Nestlé Health Science, UnitedHealth Group R&amp;D, and WW International Inc.; received consulting fees from Brightseed, Eli Lilly and Company, Intuitive, Level2, Nestlé Health Science, Novo Nordisk A/S, OptumLabs R&amp;D, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Spoke Health, and WW International Inc.; served in a leadership or fiduciary role for The Obesity Society and American Society for Nutrition Foundation; and received equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from KVK Tech, Nestlé Health Science, and WW International Inc. Zhaoping Li has served on advisory boards for Abbott Laboratories. Jesse Richards has received grants or contracts from speakers bureaus for Eli Lilly and Company; received payment or honoraria for lectures from speakers bureaus for Novo Nordisk A/S and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and served on an advisory board for Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. W. Scott Butsch has received grants from Eli Lilly and Company; consulting fees from Novo Nordisk A/S; payment from Med Learning Group and Potomac Center for Medical Education; and served on advisory boards for Abbott Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Medscape, and Alfie Health. Irina Jouravskaya is an employee of Eli Lilly and Company. Kadie S. Vanderman is an employee of Syneos Health. Lisa M. Neff is an employee and stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company; has received grants or contracts from Aegerion Pharmaceuticals Inc.; and has served in a leadership or fiduciary role with Current Developments in Nutrition (journal) and the National Board of Physician Nutrition Specialists.</p>","PeriodicalId":215,"journal":{"name":"Obesity","volume":"33 1","pages":"9-11"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.24191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

TO THE EDITOR: We thank Dr. Athinarayanan for her interest in our review [(1)] and appreciate the opportunity to respond.

We agree that patients face many challenges maintaining long-term body weight reduction, including widespread misconceptions regarding the long-term effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for obesity, along with the body's physiological response to weight loss, which can lead to reduced energy expenditure and increased appetite [(2)]. Limited access to treatment is also a barrier to successful long-term weight management [(3)]. However, we dispute Dr. Athinarayanan's suggestion that dietary carbohydrate restriction (or any other lifestyle intervention) is a proven, effective strategy for weight maintenance after treatment with antiobesity medications (AOMs). Evidence from numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) shows that, even with ongoing lifestyle counseling, weight regain is typically observed after AOM cessation [(1)]. Accordingly, long-term use of pharmacotherapy is recommended for weight maintenance [(1)]; therefore, weight management after deprescription was outside of the scope of our review.

Our review recommended a variety of healthy dietary patterns for patients treated with AOMs and highlighted the importance of individualized lifestyle goals. A low-carbohydrate diet was not excluded from our recommendations, and we provided guidance for clinicians whose patients prefer this dietary pattern. However, when considering the potential impacts of dietary patterns on long-term health outcomes such as cardiovascular disease and mortality, there is more evidence to support a recommendation for moderate-carbohydrate dietary patterns such as the Mediterranean and healthy plant-based diets [(1, 4)]. Indeed, we feel that the strength of the evidence to specifically recommend a low-carbohydrate dietary pattern is low. The carbohydrate-insulin model is an interesting but controversial theoretical model that is challenged by scientific evidence that supports alternate theories of obesity pathophysiology [(2, 5)]. As evidence of the efficacy of low-carbohydrate dietary patterns on weight maintenance, Dr. Athinarayanan cites nonrandomized studies, including a report from the National Weight Control Registry, a prospective cohort study of individuals who, prior to study entry, had maintained a weight reduction of at least 30 lb for 1 year or more. Of note, only 11% of registry participants reported losing weight with a low-carbohydrate dietary approach [(6)]. We appreciate the work of Dr. Athinarayanan and colleagues, which includes descriptive, nonrandomized studies of outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes who self-selected a telehealth-based continuous care program leveraging a low-carbohydrate dietary pattern [(7, 8)]. We also appreciate their recent retrospective analysis of the impact of deprescription of glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist therapy for type 2 diabetes on weight maintenance in a subset of these program participants [(9)]. Additional RCTs are needed to rigorously evaluate the efficacy of different lifestyle interventions, including a low-carbohydrate approach, after AOM deprescription. However, we anticipate that weight regain would occur, as has been observed previously in numerous trials, because obesity is a chronic and relapsing disease [(1)].

In summary, we agree that dietary recommendations should be personalized for patients treated with AOMs and recognize that, for select patients, a low-carbohydrate dietary pattern may be preferred; however, we are unable to specifically recommend a low-carbohydrate dietary pattern over other dietary patterns. Given the wealth of evidence from RCTs that weight regain is typical after AOM cessation, even with continued lifestyle counseling, we support efforts to optimize long-term access to evidence-based obesity care.

Jaime P. Almandoz has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, and Novo Nordisk A/S; received payment or honoraria for lectures from Clinical Care Options, the Institute for Medical and Nursing Education, and PeerView; and served in a leadership or fiduciary role with The Obesity Society Governing Board. Thomas A. Wadden has received consulting fees from Novo Nordisk A/S and WW International, Inc. (formerly Weight Watchers). Colleen Tewksbury has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and the Commission on Dietetic Registration; received support for attending meetings and/or travel from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; served in a leadership or fiduciary role for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Weight Management Dietetic Practice Group Executive Committee; and served as a spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Caroline M. Apovian has received institutional grants from GI Dynamics Inc. (now Morphic Medical), Novo Nordisk A/S, and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; received consulting fees from Cowen and Company, LLC; received payment or honoraria for lectures from Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; participated on advisory boards for Altimmune, CinFina Pharma, Currax Pharmaceuticals, EPG Communication Holdings, Form Health, L-Nutra, NeuroBo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, PainScript, Palatin Technologies, Inc., Pursuit By You, ReShape Lifesciences, Inc., Riverview School, and Roman Health Ventures Inc.; served in a leadership or fiduciary role with the World Obesity Federation; and received stock or stock options from Gelesis and Xeno Biosciences. Angela Fitch has received consulting fees from Eli Lilly and Company, Jenny Craig, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sidekick Health, and Vivus; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Novo Nordisk A/S; received payment for expert testimony from the state of Massachusetts; received support for attending meetings and/or travel from the Obesity Medicine Association and Pfizer Inc.; served in a leadership or fiduciary role with the Obesity Medicine Association; and received stock or stock options from Eli Lilly and Company and Novo Nordisk A/S. Jamy D. Ard has received grants or contracts from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Epitomee, KVK Tech, Nestlé Health Science, UnitedHealth Group R&D, and WW International Inc.; received consulting fees from Brightseed, Eli Lilly and Company, Intuitive, Level2, Nestlé Health Science, Novo Nordisk A/S, OptumLabs R&D, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Spoke Health, and WW International Inc.; served in a leadership or fiduciary role for The Obesity Society and American Society for Nutrition Foundation; and received equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from KVK Tech, Nestlé Health Science, and WW International Inc. Zhaoping Li has served on advisory boards for Abbott Laboratories. Jesse Richards has received grants or contracts from speakers bureaus for Eli Lilly and Company; received payment or honoraria for lectures from speakers bureaus for Novo Nordisk A/S and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and served on an advisory board for Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. W. Scott Butsch has received grants from Eli Lilly and Company; consulting fees from Novo Nordisk A/S; payment from Med Learning Group and Potomac Center for Medical Education; and served on advisory boards for Abbott Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Medscape, and Alfie Health. Irina Jouravskaya is an employee of Eli Lilly and Company. Kadie S. Vanderman is an employee of Syneos Health. Lisa M. Neff is an employee and stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company; has received grants or contracts from Aegerion Pharmaceuticals Inc.; and has served in a leadership or fiduciary role with Current Developments in Nutrition (journal) and the National Board of Physician Nutrition Specialists.

回应 Athinarayanan 致编辑的信。
致编辑:我们感谢Athinarayanan博士对我们的综述[(1)]感兴趣,并感谢有机会回复。我们同意患者长期保持体重减轻面临许多挑战,包括对生活方式干预对肥胖的长期有效性的普遍误解,以及身体对体重减轻的生理反应,这可能导致能量消耗减少和食欲增加[(2)]。获得治疗的机会有限也是长期体重管理成功的一个障碍[(3)]。然而,我们不同意Athinarayanan博士的建议,即饮食碳水化合物限制(或任何其他生活方式干预)是抗肥胖药物(AOMs)治疗后体重维持的有效策略。来自大量随机对照试验(RCTs)的证据表明,即使持续进行生活方式咨询,在AOM停止后通常会观察到体重反弹[(1)]。因此,建议长期使用药物治疗来维持体重[(1)];因此,减处方后的体重管理不在我们的综述范围之内。我们的综述为AOMs患者推荐了多种健康饮食模式,并强调了个性化生活方式目标的重要性。低碳水化合物饮食并没有被排除在我们的建议之外,我们也为那些喜欢这种饮食模式的患者的临床医生提供了指导。然而,当考虑到饮食模式对心血管疾病和死亡率等长期健康结果的潜在影响时,有更多证据支持中度碳水化合物饮食模式的建议,如地中海和健康的植物性饮食[(1,4)]。事实上,我们觉得专门推荐低碳水化合物饮食模式的证据力度很低。碳水化合物-胰岛素模型是一个有趣但有争议的理论模型,它受到支持肥胖病理生理学替代理论的科学证据的挑战[(2,5)]。作为低碳水化合物饮食模式对维持体重的有效性的证据,阿萨纳拉亚南博士引用了一些非随机研究,其中包括美国国家体重控制登记处(National weight Control Registry)的一份报告,这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是在研究开始之前,体重至少减轻30磅并保持一年或更长时间的个体。值得注意的是,只有11%的登记参与者报告通过低碳水化合物饮食方法减肥[(6)]。我们赞赏Athinarayanan博士及其同事的工作,其中包括对2型糖尿病患者的结果进行描述性、非随机研究,这些患者自行选择了基于远程医疗的持续护理计划,利用低碳水化合物饮食模式[(7,8)]。我们也很欣赏他们最近对胰高血糖素样肽-1激动剂治疗2型糖尿病的减处方对这些项目参与者的体重维持影响的回顾性分析[(9)]。需要额外的随机对照试验来严格评估不同生活方式干预的效果,包括低碳水化合物方法,在AOM去处方后。然而,我们预计体重会反弹,正如之前在许多试验中观察到的那样,因为肥胖是一种慢性和复发性疾病[(1)]。综上所述,我们一致认为,对于接受AOMs治疗的患者,饮食建议应该个性化,并认识到,对于某些患者,低碳水化合物饮食模式可能是首选;然而,我们不能特别推荐低碳水化合物的饮食模式优于其他饮食模式。考虑到从随机对照试验中获得的大量证据表明,即使在继续进行生活方式咨询的情况下,停止AOM后体重恢复也是典型的,我们支持优化循证肥胖护理的长期途径。Jaime P. Almandoz曾获得Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company和Novo Nordisk A/S的咨询费用;从临床护理选择、医学和护理教育研究所和PeerView获得讲座报酬或酬金;并担任肥胖症协会管理委员会的领导或受托人角色。Thomas A. Wadden曾从Novo Nordisk A/S和WW International, Inc.(前身为Weight Watchers)获得咨询费。Colleen Tewksbury已经收到了来自营养与饮食学会和饮食注册委员会的讲座、演讲、演讲局、手稿写作或教育活动的报酬或酬金;获得营养与饮食学会的会议和/或旅行支持;担任营养与饮食学会体重管理饮食实践小组执行委员会的领导或受托人角色;并担任营养与饮食学会的发言人。Caroline M. Apovian曾获得GI Dynamics Inc.的机构资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity
Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
1.40%
发文量
261
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity is the official journal of The Obesity Society and is the premier source of information for increasing knowledge, fostering translational research from basic to population science, and promoting better treatment for people with obesity. Obesity publishes important peer-reviewed research and cutting-edge reviews, commentaries, and public health and medical developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信