Examining the Impact of Eliminating the X Waiver on Buprenorphine Dispensation in 63 Counties in Pennsylvania.

Rebecca C Bilden, Mark S Roberts, Bradley D Stein, Daniel B Jones
{"title":"Examining the Impact of Eliminating the X Waiver on Buprenorphine Dispensation in 63 Counties in Pennsylvania.","authors":"Rebecca C Bilden, Mark S Roberts, Bradley D Stein, Daniel B Jones","doi":"10.1177/29767342241303583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid overdose rates continue to rise in the United States while access to treatment options remains limited. The X waiver, which allowed clinicians to prescribe buprenorphine, a medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), in an outpatient setting, was eliminated in December 2022 with hopes of increasing buprenorphine access. We used a quasi-experimental approach to evaluate how eliminating the X waiver affected buprenorphine prescribing in Pennsylvania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Drawing on Pennsylvania Prescription Drug Monitoring Program data from July 1, 2016, to December 31, 2023, we used a difference-in-differences (DD) approach to assess changes in buprenorphine prescribing between Pennsylvania counties with the proportion of X-waivered providers per county population above the median versus counties with the proportion below the median, before and after the elimination of the X waiver. We also tested whether areas most affected by the opioid epidemic with the highest rates of opioid overdose were more impacted by the X-waiver elimination, using opioid overdose death rates from a pretreatment baseline period (2016-2018) for each county.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one counties were categorized as above the median and 32 as below the median. We did not observe a significant difference in the effects of eliminating the X waiver on buprenorphine dispensation (DD estimate: -0.6%, 95% CI: -7.5%-6.2%) between above versus below-the-median counties in Pennsylvania. We also did not find a significant effect of the X-waiver elimination on buprenorphine dispensation in counties most affected by the opioid epidemic (difference-in-difference-in-differences estimate 1.6%, 95% CI: -10.2%-13.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no evidence that eliminating the X waiver had a significant impact on buprenorphine dispensing in Pennsylvania in counties with fewer waivered prescribers or higher fatal overdose rates. Additional efforts to increase buprenorphine use will likely need to address systemic barriers and stigma limiting MOUD access.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"29767342241303583"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241303583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioid overdose rates continue to rise in the United States while access to treatment options remains limited. The X waiver, which allowed clinicians to prescribe buprenorphine, a medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), in an outpatient setting, was eliminated in December 2022 with hopes of increasing buprenorphine access. We used a quasi-experimental approach to evaluate how eliminating the X waiver affected buprenorphine prescribing in Pennsylvania.

Methods: Drawing on Pennsylvania Prescription Drug Monitoring Program data from July 1, 2016, to December 31, 2023, we used a difference-in-differences (DD) approach to assess changes in buprenorphine prescribing between Pennsylvania counties with the proportion of X-waivered providers per county population above the median versus counties with the proportion below the median, before and after the elimination of the X waiver. We also tested whether areas most affected by the opioid epidemic with the highest rates of opioid overdose were more impacted by the X-waiver elimination, using opioid overdose death rates from a pretreatment baseline period (2016-2018) for each county.

Results: Thirty-one counties were categorized as above the median and 32 as below the median. We did not observe a significant difference in the effects of eliminating the X waiver on buprenorphine dispensation (DD estimate: -0.6%, 95% CI: -7.5%-6.2%) between above versus below-the-median counties in Pennsylvania. We also did not find a significant effect of the X-waiver elimination on buprenorphine dispensation in counties most affected by the opioid epidemic (difference-in-difference-in-differences estimate 1.6%, 95% CI: -10.2%-13.4%).

Conclusions: We found no evidence that eliminating the X waiver had a significant impact on buprenorphine dispensing in Pennsylvania in counties with fewer waivered prescribers or higher fatal overdose rates. Additional efforts to increase buprenorphine use will likely need to address systemic barriers and stigma limiting MOUD access.

研究宾夕法尼亚州 63 个县取消 X 豁免对丁丙诺啡分配的影响。
背景:美国阿片类药物过量率继续上升,而获得治疗选择的机会仍然有限。X豁免允许临床医生在门诊环境中开出丁丙诺啡(一种治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)的药物),该豁免于2022年12月被取消,希望增加丁丙诺啡的使用。我们使用准实验方法来评估取消X豁免对宾夕法尼亚州丁丙诺啡处方的影响。方法:利用2016年7月1日至2023年12月31日的宾夕法尼亚州处方药监测项目数据,采用差异中差法(DD)评估取消X豁免前和取消X豁免后,宾夕法尼亚州每个县人口中X豁免提供者比例高于中位数与比例低于中位数的县之间丁丙诺啡处方的变化。我们还使用每个县预处理基线期(2016-2018年)的阿片类药物过量死亡率,测试了受阿片类药物流行影响最严重、阿片类药物过量率最高的地区是否更受x -豁免取消的影响。结果:31个县被划分为中位数以上,32个县被划分为中位数以下。我们没有观察到取消X豁免对丁丙诺啡分配的影响(DD估计:-0.6%,95% CI: -7.5%-6.2%)在宾夕法尼亚州中位数以上和中位数以下的县之间有显著差异。在受阿片类药物流行影响最严重的县,我们也没有发现取消x -豁免对丁丙诺啡分配的显著影响(差异中的差异估计为1.6%,95% CI: -10.2%-13.4%)。结论:我们没有发现证据表明取消X豁免对宾夕法尼亚州的丁丙诺啡配药有显著影响,这些县的处方者较少或致命过量率较高。增加丁丙诺啡使用的额外努力可能需要解决限制mod使用的系统性障碍和耻辱感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信