Home-based end-of-life care for people with dementia: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.

Guo Yin, Leah Macaden, Divya Sivaramakrishnan, Yajing Wang, Lian Zhu, Huimin Chong
{"title":"Home-based end-of-life care for people with dementia: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.","authors":"Guo Yin, Leah Macaden, Divya Sivaramakrishnan, Yajing Wang, Lian Zhu, Huimin Chong","doi":"10.1177/14713012241308625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Integrating home-based end-of-life care for people with dementia will become increasingly important as the population ages. Therefore, it is timely and necessary to evaluate the evidence of home-based end-of-life care for people living with dementia. <b>Aim:</b> This review aims to identify the characteristics of home-based end-of-life care interventions for people living with dementia and review the existing evidence on implementation outcomes. <b>Design:</b> Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess study quality. <b>Data sources:</b> A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE CINAHL and Scopus) from June to August 2023, and the citations to the included studies were tracked through citation tracking in Google Scholar to identify potentially relevant studies. <b>Results:</b> Of the 2022 articles retrieved, 12 were included in this review. The included studies were geographically diverse, with four from the United States, three from Singapore, two from the United Kingdom, and one each from the Netherlands, Belgium, and Israel. Additionally, due to the difference of focus and nature of the studies, only seven of these studies provided information on home-based end-of-life care interventions for people living with dementia. The interventions identified in this review align closely with the essential components of optimal palliative care for dementia outlined in the European Association for Palliative Care white paper. However, the evidence supporting these home-based end-of-life care interventions for people living with dementia is constrained by the number of studies and methodological limitations. Nevertheless, this systematic review still identifies some evidence supporting home-based end-of-life care for people living with dementia, including reduced healthcare utilization and costs, as well as help people living with dementia realize their wish to die at home. <b>Conclusions:</b> Whilst current evidence highlights benefits of home-based end-of-life care for people living with dementia, the relatively limited number, methodology of studies, the heterogeneity of study focus and outcome measures hinder the formation of definitive conclusions. Therefore, further research is needed to develop and evaluate home end-of-life care services for people living with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012241308625"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012241308625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Integrating home-based end-of-life care for people with dementia will become increasingly important as the population ages. Therefore, it is timely and necessary to evaluate the evidence of home-based end-of-life care for people living with dementia. Aim: This review aims to identify the characteristics of home-based end-of-life care interventions for people living with dementia and review the existing evidence on implementation outcomes. Design: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess study quality. Data sources: A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE CINAHL and Scopus) from June to August 2023, and the citations to the included studies were tracked through citation tracking in Google Scholar to identify potentially relevant studies. Results: Of the 2022 articles retrieved, 12 were included in this review. The included studies were geographically diverse, with four from the United States, three from Singapore, two from the United Kingdom, and one each from the Netherlands, Belgium, and Israel. Additionally, due to the difference of focus and nature of the studies, only seven of these studies provided information on home-based end-of-life care interventions for people living with dementia. The interventions identified in this review align closely with the essential components of optimal palliative care for dementia outlined in the European Association for Palliative Care white paper. However, the evidence supporting these home-based end-of-life care interventions for people living with dementia is constrained by the number of studies and methodological limitations. Nevertheless, this systematic review still identifies some evidence supporting home-based end-of-life care for people living with dementia, including reduced healthcare utilization and costs, as well as help people living with dementia realize their wish to die at home. Conclusions: Whilst current evidence highlights benefits of home-based end-of-life care for people living with dementia, the relatively limited number, methodology of studies, the heterogeneity of study focus and outcome measures hinder the formation of definitive conclusions. Therefore, further research is needed to develop and evaluate home end-of-life care services for people living with dementia.

痴呆症患者的家庭临终关怀:定量和定性证据的系统回顾。
背景:随着人口老龄化的加剧,为痴呆症患者整合居家临终关怀服务将变得越来越重要。因此,评估针对痴呆症患者的居家临终关怀的证据是及时和必要的。目的:本综述旨在确定针对痴呆症患者的居家临终关怀干预措施的特点,并回顾有关实施结果的现有证据。设计:系统回顾与叙事综合。采用混合方法评估工具评估研究质量。数据来源:从 2023 年 6 月到 8 月,在五个数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 Scopus)中进行了全面检索,并通过谷歌学术(Google Scholar)中的引文跟踪功能对纳入研究的引文进行跟踪,以确定潜在的相关研究。结果:在检索到的 2022 篇文章中,有 12 篇被纳入本综述。所纳入的研究具有地域多样性,其中四篇来自美国,三篇来自新加坡,两篇来自英国,荷兰、比利时和以色列各一篇。此外,由于研究的重点和性质不同,其中只有七项研究提供了有关痴呆症患者居家临终关怀干预措施的信息。本综述中确定的干预措施与欧洲姑息关怀协会白皮书中概述的痴呆症最佳姑息关怀的基本组成部分非常吻合。然而,由于研究数量和方法上的限制,支持这些针对痴呆症患者的居家临终关怀干预措施的证据有限。尽管如此,本系统综述仍然发现了一些支持对痴呆症患者进行居家临终关怀的证据,包括降低医疗使用率和成本,以及帮助痴呆症患者实现在家中去世的愿望。结论:虽然目前的证据凸显了居家临终关怀对痴呆症患者的益处,但相对有限的研究数量、研究方法、研究重点和结果测量的异质性阻碍了最终结论的形成。因此,需要进一步开展研究,以开发和评估针对痴呆症患者的居家临终关怀服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信