Declining Influenza Vaccination Uptake, Attitudes, and Knowledge Among Healthcare Workers in Chengdu, China, in the Post-COVID-19 Era.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2024-12-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S490301
Lin Xu, Shaohua Chen, Chunmei Li, Xiaogang Zhou, Li Tang
{"title":"Declining Influenza Vaccination Uptake, Attitudes, and Knowledge Among Healthcare Workers in Chengdu, China, in the Post-COVID-19 Era.","authors":"Lin Xu, Shaohua Chen, Chunmei Li, Xiaogang Zhou, Li Tang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S490301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite the benefits of influenza vaccination, particularly for healthcare workers (HCWs) at higher risk, vaccination coverage among HCWs in China remains low. This study aims to provide updated insights into the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers related to influenza vaccination among HCWs in China post-COVID-19 era, to inform strategies for improving vaccination rates and healthcare safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted between December 2023 and January 2024 at two tertiary hospitals in Chengdu, China. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with HCWs' influenza vaccination uptake for the 2023-2024 season.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 602 HCWs who completed the questionnaire (response rate: 86.0%), influenza vaccination uptake for the 2023-2024 season was low at 14.1%, down from 31.2% in 2021-2022 and 18.4% in 2022-2023. Main reasons for vaccine hesitancy included mistrust of vaccines (56.0%), inconvenient access (52.0%), and concerns over time, cost, and information (57.6%). Although most HCWs acknowledged the protective benefits of vaccination, only one-third supported mandatory vaccination, with concerns about personal autonomy among opponents. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that HCWs were more likely to be vaccinated if they believed it was essential for their job [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.21; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13, 4.30), recognized their higher risk (aOR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.09, 5.15), and were aware of high-risk groups for influenza vaccination (aOR: 2.49; 95% CI: 1.41, 4.40) as well as the age group with a higher infection rate (aOR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.01, 3.51). However, those favoring increased campaign visibility had lower vaccination rates (aOR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The persistently low influenza vaccination rates among HCWs in China post-COVID-19 highlight significant gaps in healthcare risk management. Targeted interventions, including enhanced education and better vaccine access, are needed, along with further discussion on mandatory vaccination as a potential solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"17 ","pages":"3049-3063"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11646393/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S490301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the benefits of influenza vaccination, particularly for healthcare workers (HCWs) at higher risk, vaccination coverage among HCWs in China remains low. This study aims to provide updated insights into the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers related to influenza vaccination among HCWs in China post-COVID-19 era, to inform strategies for improving vaccination rates and healthcare safety.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between December 2023 and January 2024 at two tertiary hospitals in Chengdu, China. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with HCWs' influenza vaccination uptake for the 2023-2024 season.

Results: Of the 602 HCWs who completed the questionnaire (response rate: 86.0%), influenza vaccination uptake for the 2023-2024 season was low at 14.1%, down from 31.2% in 2021-2022 and 18.4% in 2022-2023. Main reasons for vaccine hesitancy included mistrust of vaccines (56.0%), inconvenient access (52.0%), and concerns over time, cost, and information (57.6%). Although most HCWs acknowledged the protective benefits of vaccination, only one-third supported mandatory vaccination, with concerns about personal autonomy among opponents. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that HCWs were more likely to be vaccinated if they believed it was essential for their job [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.21; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13, 4.30), recognized their higher risk (aOR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.09, 5.15), and were aware of high-risk groups for influenza vaccination (aOR: 2.49; 95% CI: 1.41, 4.40) as well as the age group with a higher infection rate (aOR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.01, 3.51). However, those favoring increased campaign visibility had lower vaccination rates (aOR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.82).

Conclusion: The persistently low influenza vaccination rates among HCWs in China post-COVID-19 highlight significant gaps in healthcare risk management. Targeted interventions, including enhanced education and better vaccine access, are needed, along with further discussion on mandatory vaccination as a potential solution.

后 COVID-19 时代中国成都医护人员的流感疫苗接种率、态度和知识水平下降。
目的:尽管流感疫苗接种有好处,特别是对高危卫生保健工作者(HCWs),但中国卫生保健工作者的疫苗接种覆盖率仍然很低。本研究旨在为中国后covid -19时代卫生保健工作者在流感疫苗接种方面的知识、态度、做法和障碍提供最新见解,为提高疫苗接种率和卫生保健安全提供战略依据。方法:于2023年12月至2024年1月在成都市两所三级医院进行横断面调查。采用Logistic回归分析确定与卫生保健工作者2023-2024年流感疫苗接种率相关的因素。结果:在完成问卷调查的602名卫生保健工作者中(应答率:86.0%),2023-2024年流感疫苗接种率较低,为14.1%,低于2021-2022年的31.2%和2022-2023年的18.4%。疫苗犹豫的主要原因包括对疫苗的不信任(56.0%)、获取不便(52.0%)和对时间、成本和信息的担忧(57.6%)。尽管大多数卫生保健工作者承认疫苗接种的保护作用,但只有三分之一的人支持强制性疫苗接种,担心反对者的个人自主权。多变量logistic回归分析显示,如果医护人员认为疫苗接种对他们的工作至关重要,他们更有可能接种疫苗[调整优势比(aOR): 2.21;95%置信区间(CI): 1.13, 4.30),可识别出其较高的风险(aOR: 2.37;95% CI: 1.09, 5.15),并了解流感疫苗接种的高危人群(aOR: 2.49;95% CI: 1.41, 4.40)以及感染率较高的年龄组(aOR: 1.89;95% ci: 1.01, 3.51)。然而,那些赞成增加运动可见度的疫苗接种率较低(aOR: 0.38;95% ci: 0.17, 0.82)。结论:新冠肺炎疫情后,中国卫生保健工作者流感疫苗接种率持续偏低,凸显卫生保健风险管理存在重大缺口。需要有针对性的干预措施,包括加强教育和更好地获得疫苗,同时进一步讨论强制性疫苗接种作为一种可能的解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信