{"title":"Curricular Assessment Blueprint and Needs Analysis for the Social, Administrative, and Behavioral Foundational Sciences.","authors":"Aleda M H Chen, Krisy-Ann Thornby, Anandi V Law","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this integrative review is to analyze conceptual topics, applied content, teaching and learning strategies, and assessment methods within social, administrative, and behavioral sciences (SAS) syllabi and literature. The goal is to evaluate opportunities for enhancing the adoption and implementation of Curricular Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities (COEPA) 2022. Recommendations to better inform curriculum and assessment planning efforts are presented for programs and faculty seeking to optimize the integration of SAS content.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our search yielded 69 SAS-related syllabi from the AACP Connect repository and 296 publications from pharmacy journals focused on education. Most SAS literature was published in the didactic setting, which represents an opportunity to interweave and apply SAS knowledge concepts through the experiential, co-curricular, and interprofessional settings. Moving forward, it is prudent to thoughtfully design assessment measures that encompass both summative and formative evaluations. The literature findings offer valuable insights and examples regarding content, teaching strategies, and assessment methods. These findings can serve as a practical roadmap, providing ideas and guidance for programs and faculty aiming to enhance the integration of SAS content into their curricula.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In response to the recent guidance from COEPA 2022 and the release of Standards 2025, programs and faculty have the responsibility to thoughtfully revise and improve the delivery and assessment of SAS content. The intentional integration of SAS knowledge, skills and attitudes should be guided by a collaborative effort to develop pharmacists who deliver effective person-centered care and are well-equipped to navigate the complexities of healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101346"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101346","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this integrative review is to analyze conceptual topics, applied content, teaching and learning strategies, and assessment methods within social, administrative, and behavioral sciences (SAS) syllabi and literature. The goal is to evaluate opportunities for enhancing the adoption and implementation of Curricular Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities (COEPA) 2022. Recommendations to better inform curriculum and assessment planning efforts are presented for programs and faculty seeking to optimize the integration of SAS content.
Findings: Our search yielded 69 SAS-related syllabi from the AACP Connect repository and 296 publications from pharmacy journals focused on education. Most SAS literature was published in the didactic setting, which represents an opportunity to interweave and apply SAS knowledge concepts through the experiential, co-curricular, and interprofessional settings. Moving forward, it is prudent to thoughtfully design assessment measures that encompass both summative and formative evaluations. The literature findings offer valuable insights and examples regarding content, teaching strategies, and assessment methods. These findings can serve as a practical roadmap, providing ideas and guidance for programs and faculty aiming to enhance the integration of SAS content into their curricula.
Summary: In response to the recent guidance from COEPA 2022 and the release of Standards 2025, programs and faculty have the responsibility to thoughtfully revise and improve the delivery and assessment of SAS content. The intentional integration of SAS knowledge, skills and attitudes should be guided by a collaborative effort to develop pharmacists who deliver effective person-centered care and are well-equipped to navigate the complexities of healthcare.
目标:本综合评论旨在分析社会、行政和行为科学(SAS)教学大纲和文献中的概念主题、应用内容、教学和学习策略以及评估方法。目的是评估加强采用和实施 2022 年课程成果和委托专业活动(COEPA)的机会。研究结果:我们的搜索从 AACP Connect 资料库中获得了 69 份与 SAS 相关的教学大纲,并从专注于教育的药学期刊中获得了 296 篇出版物。大多数 SAS 文献都是在教学环境中发表的,这为通过体验、共同课程和跨专业环境来交织和应用 SAS 知识概念提供了机会。展望未来,谨慎的做法是深思熟虑地设计评估措施,既包括终结性评估,也包括形成性评估。文献研究结果为教学内容、教学策略和评估方法提供了宝贵的见解和实例。这些发现可以作为实用的路线图,为旨在加强将 SAS 内容整合到课程中的项目和教师提供想法和指导。摘要:根据 COEPA 2022 的最新指导和《标准 2025》的发布,项目和教师有责任深思熟虑地修订和改进 SAS 内容的讲授和评估。在有意识地整合 SAS 知识、技能和态度的过程中,应通力合作,培养出能够提供以人为本的有效护理,并有能力驾驭复杂医疗保健的药剂师。
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.