Alternatives for exhausted dialysis access

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Laura B. Pride, Edwyn J. Assaf, Lauren N. West-Livingston, Christina L. Cui, Tristen T. Chun, Chandler A. Long
{"title":"Alternatives for exhausted dialysis access","authors":"Laura B. Pride,&nbsp;Edwyn J. Assaf,&nbsp;Lauren N. West-Livingston,&nbsp;Christina L. Cui,&nbsp;Tristen T. Chun,&nbsp;Chandler A. Long","doi":"10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hemodialysis (HD) access failure is a frequent problem encountered by vascular surgeons. As treatment of end-stage renal disease improves and patients live longer on HD, eventual exhaustion of traditional upper extremity HD access is common. Efforts to preserve and maintain these accesses are essential. However, when they fail, alternative surgical access options should be pursued prior to destination-tunneled dialysis catheters. Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow grafts as well as various configurations of lower extremity arteriovenous fistulae and grafts can be utilized. For most alternative HD access options, there is a paucity of data for long-term patency, cost, and risk of infectious or ischemic complications compared to traditional options. However, smaller studies examining Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow grafts, femoral vein transposition, and lower extremity grafts show acceptable safety and efficacy. Depending on the cause of traditional access failure and patient-specific anatomic constraints, we recommend a systematic approach to alternative access creation, with destination-tunneled dialysis catheters reserved as a last resort. The most common cause of HD access failure is venous outflow obstruction. As such, we have structured this manuscript around a meta-analysis of retrospective studies describing nontraditional access options that can be utilized with escalating degrees of central venous stenosis or occlusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51153,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Vascular Surgery","volume":"37 4","pages":"Pages 400-406"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895796724000632","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hemodialysis (HD) access failure is a frequent problem encountered by vascular surgeons. As treatment of end-stage renal disease improves and patients live longer on HD, eventual exhaustion of traditional upper extremity HD access is common. Efforts to preserve and maintain these accesses are essential. However, when they fail, alternative surgical access options should be pursued prior to destination-tunneled dialysis catheters. Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow grafts as well as various configurations of lower extremity arteriovenous fistulae and grafts can be utilized. For most alternative HD access options, there is a paucity of data for long-term patency, cost, and risk of infectious or ischemic complications compared to traditional options. However, smaller studies examining Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow grafts, femoral vein transposition, and lower extremity grafts show acceptable safety and efficacy. Depending on the cause of traditional access failure and patient-specific anatomic constraints, we recommend a systematic approach to alternative access creation, with destination-tunneled dialysis catheters reserved as a last resort. The most common cause of HD access failure is venous outflow obstruction. As such, we have structured this manuscript around a meta-analysis of retrospective studies describing nontraditional access options that can be utilized with escalating degrees of central venous stenosis or occlusion.
用尽透析通道的替代方案。
血液透析(HD)通路失败是血管外科医生经常遇到的问题。随着终末期肾病治疗的改善和HD患者寿命的延长,传统的上肢HD通道最终衰竭是很常见的。保护和维护这些通道的努力至关重要。然而,当它们失败时,应在目的隧道透析导管之前寻求其他手术通路选择。血液透析可靠的流出性移植物,以及各种配置的下肢动静脉瘘和移植物都可以使用。与传统方案相比,对于大多数替代HD接入方案,缺乏长期通畅、成本和感染或缺血性并发症风险的数据。然而,对血液透析可靠流出体移植物、股静脉转位和下肢移植物的小型研究显示出可接受的安全性和有效性。根据传统通路失败的原因和患者特定的解剖限制,我们建议采用一种系统的方法来创建替代通路,保留目的隧道透析导管作为最后的手段。HD通道失败最常见的原因是静脉流出梗阻。因此,我们围绕回顾性研究的荟萃分析构建了这篇论文,这些研究描述了可以用于中心静脉狭窄或闭塞程度不断升级的非传统通路选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Vascular Surgery examines the latest thinking on a particular clinical problem and features new diagnostic and operative techniques. The journal allows practitioners to expand their capabilities and to keep pace with the most rapidly evolving areas of surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信