The psychological impact of reopening after COVID-19 lockdowns in China: Threat perception, affect and moral conflict

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Qin Duan , Shangyi Chen , Hang Yuan , Yue Zhang , Siyang Luo
{"title":"The psychological impact of reopening after COVID-19 lockdowns in China: Threat perception, affect and moral conflict","authors":"Qin Duan ,&nbsp;Shangyi Chen ,&nbsp;Hang Yuan ,&nbsp;Yue Zhang ,&nbsp;Siyang Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>COVID-19 reopening of China in the context of the highly transmissible Omicron variant has resulted in an unprecedented wave of infections, placing significant strain on healthcare systems and giving rise to a range of psychological responses, including perceptions of the pandemic's threat, emotional reactions, and prosocial intentions amid moral conflicts over medical resource scarcity and evolving public health responses. This study employed a comprehensive approach integrating surveys, behavioral experiments, and agent-based modeling (ABM) to examine these psychological impacts of COVID-19 reopening. A total of 1,675 participants from 34 Chinese provinces completed the surveys, with 587 also undertaking the reversal-learning task. The measures employed were primarily designed to assess perceptions of COVID-19 infection risk and medical resources, negative affect, and prosocial intentions in moral conflicts. Results found that the perception of infection risk and associated negative affects remained elevated until the pandemic decline. However, prosocial intentions initially increased, but subsequently decreased. Moreover, the influence of perceived public medical resources and negative affect on prosocial intentions is mediated by distinct pathways. ABM suggested that anxiety might accelerate the pandemic but increase overall fatalities through prosocial actions, while public medical resources perceptions might shape the pandemic by influencing healthcare-seeking behaviors. These findings underscore the crucial role of psychological factors in pandemic management, alongside physical aspects, providing a scientific foundation for future responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"365 ","pages":"Article 117611"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624010657","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 reopening of China in the context of the highly transmissible Omicron variant has resulted in an unprecedented wave of infections, placing significant strain on healthcare systems and giving rise to a range of psychological responses, including perceptions of the pandemic's threat, emotional reactions, and prosocial intentions amid moral conflicts over medical resource scarcity and evolving public health responses. This study employed a comprehensive approach integrating surveys, behavioral experiments, and agent-based modeling (ABM) to examine these psychological impacts of COVID-19 reopening. A total of 1,675 participants from 34 Chinese provinces completed the surveys, with 587 also undertaking the reversal-learning task. The measures employed were primarily designed to assess perceptions of COVID-19 infection risk and medical resources, negative affect, and prosocial intentions in moral conflicts. Results found that the perception of infection risk and associated negative affects remained elevated until the pandemic decline. However, prosocial intentions initially increased, but subsequently decreased. Moreover, the influence of perceived public medical resources and negative affect on prosocial intentions is mediated by distinct pathways. ABM suggested that anxiety might accelerate the pandemic but increase overall fatalities through prosocial actions, while public medical resources perceptions might shape the pandemic by influencing healthcare-seeking behaviors. These findings underscore the crucial role of psychological factors in pandemic management, alongside physical aspects, providing a scientific foundation for future responses.
中国 COVID-19 封锁后重新开放的心理影响:威胁感、情感和道德冲突。
在高传染性欧米克隆变异的背景下,COVID-19在中国重新开放,导致了前所未有的感染浪潮,给医疗系统带来了巨大压力,并引发了一系列心理反应,包括对大流行威胁的认知、情绪反应以及在医疗资源稀缺和不断变化的公共卫生应对措施的道德冲突中产生的亲社会意图。本研究采用综合方法,将调查、行为实验和基于主体的建模(ABM)结合起来,研究了COVID-19重新开放的这些心理影响。来自中国34个省份的1675名参与者完成了调查,其中587人还进行了反向学习任务。所采用的措施主要用于评估对COVID-19感染风险和医疗资源、负面影响以及道德冲突中的亲社会意图的看法。结果发现,在大流行消退之前,对感染风险和相关负面影响的认知仍然很高。然而,亲社会意图最初增加,但随后减少。此外,公共医疗资源感知和负面情绪对亲社会意向的影响是通过不同的途径介导的。ABM认为,焦虑可能会加速大流行,但会通过亲社会行动增加总体死亡率,而公共医疗资源观念可能会通过影响就医行为来塑造大流行。这些发现强调了心理因素和生理因素在大流行管理中的关键作用,为今后的应对提供了科学基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信