Unwanted or negative treatment reactions in digital psychological interventions for adolescents with chronic pain.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Rocío de la Vega, Kaylee Yokoyama, Kristen Daniels, Tonya M Palermo
{"title":"Unwanted or negative treatment reactions in digital psychological interventions for adolescents with chronic pain.","authors":"Rocío de la Vega, Kaylee Yokoyama, Kristen Daniels, Tonya M Palermo","doi":"10.1093/jpepsy/jsae099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Reports of pain clinical trials evaluating psychological treatments often lack sufficient details on the potential and actual harm resulting from intervention. We aimed to understand how frequent and intense treatment reactions, conceptualized as unwanted symptoms, were in three clinical trials of digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for adolescents with: (1) chronic primary pain, (2) sickle cell disease, and (3) chronic pancreatitis. We also aimed to understand any differences by demographic and clinical variables.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Analyses were conducted with 246 youths (12-18 years old) experiencing chronic pain and one of their caregivers. 66% of the total sample was female. The number, intensity, and type of treatment reactions experienced were assessed post treatment. T-tests and Chi-squared tests were conducted to explore whether certain treatment reactions were more frequent as a function of baseline or clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>9% of participants experienced some negative treatment reaction. The average intensity of those events was very low on a 0-3 scale (M = 0.1, SD = 0.4). There were no differences in the prevalence or intensity as a function of participant's sex, age, race, or baseline pain intensity. However, baseline anxiety [t = -2.4 (244); p < .05] and baseline pain interference [t = -2.2 (223); p < .05] were significantly higher in those who experienced negative treatment reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A small number of participants reported experiencing negative treatment reactions, with a low intensity level. Those experiencing negative treatment reactions showed higher baseline anxiety and pain interference. Future research may build from our example to standardize collection of harms data in trials of psychological interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsae099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Reports of pain clinical trials evaluating psychological treatments often lack sufficient details on the potential and actual harm resulting from intervention. We aimed to understand how frequent and intense treatment reactions, conceptualized as unwanted symptoms, were in three clinical trials of digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for adolescents with: (1) chronic primary pain, (2) sickle cell disease, and (3) chronic pancreatitis. We also aimed to understand any differences by demographic and clinical variables.

Method: Analyses were conducted with 246 youths (12-18 years old) experiencing chronic pain and one of their caregivers. 66% of the total sample was female. The number, intensity, and type of treatment reactions experienced were assessed post treatment. T-tests and Chi-squared tests were conducted to explore whether certain treatment reactions were more frequent as a function of baseline or clinical characteristics.

Results: 9% of participants experienced some negative treatment reaction. The average intensity of those events was very low on a 0-3 scale (M = 0.1, SD = 0.4). There were no differences in the prevalence or intensity as a function of participant's sex, age, race, or baseline pain intensity. However, baseline anxiety [t = -2.4 (244); p < .05] and baseline pain interference [t = -2.2 (223); p < .05] were significantly higher in those who experienced negative treatment reactions.

Conclusions: A small number of participants reported experiencing negative treatment reactions, with a low intensity level. Those experiencing negative treatment reactions showed higher baseline anxiety and pain interference. Future research may build from our example to standardize collection of harms data in trials of psychological interventions.

目的:评估心理治疗的疼痛临床试验报告往往缺乏足够的细节来说明干预可能造成的伤害和实际伤害。我们旨在了解在三项针对患有以下疾病的青少年的数字认知行为疗法(CBT)临床试验中,治疗反应(概念化为不希望出现的症状)的频繁程度和强烈程度:(1)慢性原发性疼痛;(2)镰状细胞病;(3)慢性胰腺炎。我们还希望了解人口统计学和临床变量的差异:我们对 246 名患有慢性疼痛的青少年(12-18 岁)及其一名照顾者进行了分析。总样本中有 66% 为女性。在治疗后对治疗反应的数量、强度和类型进行了评估。通过T检验和Chi-squared检验来探究某些治疗反应是否因基线或临床特征而更为频繁:结果:9%的参与者出现了一些不良治疗反应。在 0-3 级评分中,这些反应的平均强度很低(M = 0.1,SD = 0.4)。参与者的性别、年龄、种族或基线疼痛强度在发生率或强度上没有差异。然而,基线焦虑[t = -2.4 (244); p 结论:基线焦虑的程度与参与者的性别、年龄、种族或基线疼痛强度无关:少数参与者报告出现了负面治疗反应,且强度较低。那些经历过负面治疗反应的人表现出更高的基线焦虑和疼痛干扰。未来的研究可以借鉴我们的例子,在心理干预试验中规范伤害数据的收集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Journal of Pediatric Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Psychology is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Psychology, Division 54 of the American Psychological Association. The Journal of Pediatric Psychology publishes articles related to theory, research, and professional practice in pediatric psychology. Pediatric psychology is an integrated field of science and practice in which the principles of psychology are applied within the context of pediatric health. The field aims to promote the health and development of children, adolescents, and their families through use of evidence-based methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信