Evaluating Blended Teaching Models in Medical Colleges: Preferences and Influential Factors for Teachers and Students.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S487408
Fan Yang, Pan Liu, Peng Duan, Dongdong Zhang
{"title":"Evaluating Blended Teaching Models in Medical Colleges: Preferences and Influential Factors for Teachers and Students.","authors":"Fan Yang, Pan Liu, Peng Duan, Dongdong Zhang","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S487408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the adoption of blended teaching models by faculty and students at Hubei University of Medicine. It aims to assess their willingness to adopt hybrid learning and identify the factors influencing their choices. The goal is to provide a theoretical foundation for reforming teaching models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We distributed questionnaires to 235 faculty members and 1501 students at Hubei Medical College to assess their preferences for various teaching models. We analyzed the results using multiple logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the participants, 34.5% of teachers and 33.7% of students preferred the hybrid teaching model. Influential factors for selecting this model included the quality of online teaching (OR=1.601, 95% CI: 1.221-2.100) and teacher-student interaction (OR=2.568, 95% CI: 1.230-5.361) for teachers. For students, significant factors included online learning tools (OR=1.894, 95% CI: 1.002-3.580), a single teaching method (OR=1.390, 95% CI: 1.042-1.856), low learning efficiency (OR=2.154, 95% CI: 1.673-2.774), and the effectiveness of online learning (OR=1.257, 95% CI: 1.181-1.339).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The blended teaching model has gained popularity among faculty and students in higher education. Universities should leverage advancements in information technology to address challenges in hybrid teaching. Maximizing students' sense of academic achievement and satisfaction is recommended to enhance and support the blended teaching approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"15 ","pages":"1195-1203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S487408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluates the adoption of blended teaching models by faculty and students at Hubei University of Medicine. It aims to assess their willingness to adopt hybrid learning and identify the factors influencing their choices. The goal is to provide a theoretical foundation for reforming teaching models.

Methods: We distributed questionnaires to 235 faculty members and 1501 students at Hubei Medical College to assess their preferences for various teaching models. We analyzed the results using multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results: Among the participants, 34.5% of teachers and 33.7% of students preferred the hybrid teaching model. Influential factors for selecting this model included the quality of online teaching (OR=1.601, 95% CI: 1.221-2.100) and teacher-student interaction (OR=2.568, 95% CI: 1.230-5.361) for teachers. For students, significant factors included online learning tools (OR=1.894, 95% CI: 1.002-3.580), a single teaching method (OR=1.390, 95% CI: 1.042-1.856), low learning efficiency (OR=2.154, 95% CI: 1.673-2.774), and the effectiveness of online learning (OR=1.257, 95% CI: 1.181-1.339).

Conclusion: The blended teaching model has gained popularity among faculty and students in higher education. Universities should leverage advancements in information technology to address challenges in hybrid teaching. Maximizing students' sense of academic achievement and satisfaction is recommended to enhance and support the blended teaching approach.

研究目的本研究评估了湖北医药学院师生采用混合教学模式的情况。旨在评估他们采用混合式教学的意愿,并找出影响他们选择的因素。目的是为教学模式改革提供理论基础:我们向湖北医药学院的 235 名教师和 1501 名学生发放了调查问卷,以评估他们对各种教学模式的偏好。我们采用多元逻辑回归分析法对结果进行了分析:结果:34.5%的教师和 33.7%的学生倾向于混合式教学模式。对教师而言,选择该模式的影响因素包括在线教学质量(OR=1.601,95% CI:1.221-2.100)和师生互动(OR=2.568,95% CI:1.230-5.361)。对学生而言,重要因素包括在线学习工具(OR=1.894,95% CI:1.002-3.580)、单一教学方法(OR=1.390,95% CI:1.042-1.856)、学习效率低(OR=2.154,95% CI:1.673-2.774)和在线学习效果(OR=1.257,95% CI:1.181-1.339):混合式教学模式在高校教师和学生中越来越受欢迎。高校应利用信息技术的进步来应对混合教学中的挑战。建议最大限度地提高学生的学业成就感和满意度,以加强和支持混合式教学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信