Managing Health Without Stable Housing: Dimensions of Treatment Burden and Patient Capacity for People With Chronic Health Conditions Experiencing Homelessness.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Elizabeth Bowen, Amanda J Anderson, Nicole Capozziello, Sharon Hewner
{"title":"Managing Health Without Stable Housing: Dimensions of Treatment Burden and Patient Capacity for People With Chronic Health Conditions Experiencing Homelessness.","authors":"Elizabeth Bowen, Amanda J Anderson, Nicole Capozziello, Sharon Hewner","doi":"10.1177/10497323241302673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although chronic health conditions and homelessness are prevalent problems in the United States and globally, little research has used the lens of burden of treatment theory to examine the experiences of people facing these challenges simultaneously. This study aimed to illuminate dimensions of treatment burden, which refers to the work of being a patient with chronic conditions, and patient capacity to manage this burden in a sample of people experiencing homelessness and chronic health problems in Buffalo, New York, United States. We completed in-depth interviews with men and women recruited from a homelessness services organization (<i>N</i> = 27) and applied core concepts from burden of treatment theory to our analysis to probe how participants navigated tasks related to treatment and self-care. Using codebook thematic analysis involving three coders, results revealed four interconnected themes of complex coordination, self-monitoring, obtaining and using prescriptions and medical supplies, and communication and explaining health issues, which were confirmed through member checking (<i>N</i> = 6). These dimensions of treatment burden were dynamically impacted by patient capacity factors-which included trauma, medical mistrust, health literacy, and social support-as well as by social determinants of health such as housing and income. Findings support the need for more formal collaboration mechanisms between healthcare providers and social service agencies, active involvement of patients in their health plans, and policies such as Housing First to improve access to stable and affordable housing and social services for people with complex health issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323241302673"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241302673","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although chronic health conditions and homelessness are prevalent problems in the United States and globally, little research has used the lens of burden of treatment theory to examine the experiences of people facing these challenges simultaneously. This study aimed to illuminate dimensions of treatment burden, which refers to the work of being a patient with chronic conditions, and patient capacity to manage this burden in a sample of people experiencing homelessness and chronic health problems in Buffalo, New York, United States. We completed in-depth interviews with men and women recruited from a homelessness services organization (N = 27) and applied core concepts from burden of treatment theory to our analysis to probe how participants navigated tasks related to treatment and self-care. Using codebook thematic analysis involving three coders, results revealed four interconnected themes of complex coordination, self-monitoring, obtaining and using prescriptions and medical supplies, and communication and explaining health issues, which were confirmed through member checking (N = 6). These dimensions of treatment burden were dynamically impacted by patient capacity factors-which included trauma, medical mistrust, health literacy, and social support-as well as by social determinants of health such as housing and income. Findings support the need for more formal collaboration mechanisms between healthcare providers and social service agencies, active involvement of patients in their health plans, and policies such as Housing First to improve access to stable and affordable housing and social services for people with complex health issues.

虽然慢性病和无家可归是美国乃至全球普遍存在的问题,但很少有研究从治疗负担理论的角度来研究同时面临这些挑战的人的经历。本研究旨在从美国纽约州布法罗市无家可归者和慢性病患者的样本中,了解治疗负担(指作为慢性病患者的工作)的各个方面,以及患者管理这种负担的能力。我们对从无家可归者服务机构招募的男性和女性(27 人)进行了深入访谈,并将治疗负担理论的核心概念应用于我们的分析,以探究参与者如何处理与治疗和自我护理相关的任务。通过由三位编码员参与的编码本主题分析,结果发现了四个相互关联的主题,即复杂的协调、自我监控、获取和使用处方和医疗用品,以及沟通和解释健康问题,并通过成员检查(N = 6)确认了这些主题。治疗负担的这些方面受到患者能力因素(包括创伤、对医疗的不信任、健康知识和社会支持)以及健康的社会决定因素(如住房和收入)的动态影响。研究结果支持有必要在医疗服务提供者和社会服务机构之间建立更正式的合作机制,让患者积极参与其健康计划,并制定诸如 "住房优先"(Housing First)等政策,以改善有复杂健康问题的人获得稳定且负担得起的住房和社会服务的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信