Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Versus Conventional Flowable Composites: An In Vitro Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Akshatha Chatra, Prathap M S Nair, Vivian Flourish D'Costa, Jayaprakash Kukkila, Arun Mayya, Laxmikanth Chatra, Shreemathi S Mayya
{"title":"Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Versus Conventional Flowable Composites: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Akshatha Chatra, Prathap M S Nair, Vivian Flourish D'Costa, Jayaprakash Kukkila, Arun Mayya, Laxmikanth Chatra, Shreemathi S Mayya","doi":"10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_14_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>As an emerging yet underexplored innovation in dentistry, self-adhesive flowable composites (SAFCs) represent a promising and enduring advancement in the dental material technology. Our study aims to evaluate the shear bond strength of two SAFCs and the bonding of conventional flowable composite (CFC) to permanent dentin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-six teeth were embedded in acrylic blocks, with the occlusal third removed to expose the underlying dentin. A cylindrical mold was positioned on the treated dentin surface and filled with the composite resin material to be evaluated. The prepared permanent dentin surfaces were randomly assigned to three groups based on the following application protocols: Group 1: Axo Uni Flow (AXIMACK, India); Group 2: Constic (DMG, Germany); and Group 3: 37% phosphoric acid etchant + Single Bond Universal + Filtek Z350 XT (3M ESPE, USA). The shear bond strength of the prepared specimens was measured by using a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance, followed by Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner pairwise comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Filtek Z350 XT (3M ESPE, USA) demonstrated higher shear bond strength values when compared to Constic (DMG, Germany) and Axo Uni Flow (AXIMACK, India). A significant difference was found between these materials. However, the shear bond strength of the two SAFCs tested did not differ significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The investigation's findings suggest that the SAFCs exhibited inferior shear bond strength compared with CFCs when bonded with permanent dentin.</p>","PeriodicalId":47247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","volume":"14 5","pages":"362-368"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_14_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: As an emerging yet underexplored innovation in dentistry, self-adhesive flowable composites (SAFCs) represent a promising and enduring advancement in the dental material technology. Our study aims to evaluate the shear bond strength of two SAFCs and the bonding of conventional flowable composite (CFC) to permanent dentin.

Materials and methods: Thirty-six teeth were embedded in acrylic blocks, with the occlusal third removed to expose the underlying dentin. A cylindrical mold was positioned on the treated dentin surface and filled with the composite resin material to be evaluated. The prepared permanent dentin surfaces were randomly assigned to three groups based on the following application protocols: Group 1: Axo Uni Flow (AXIMACK, India); Group 2: Constic (DMG, Germany); and Group 3: 37% phosphoric acid etchant + Single Bond Universal + Filtek Z350 XT (3M ESPE, USA). The shear bond strength of the prepared specimens was measured by using a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance, followed by Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner pairwise comparisons.

Results: Filtek Z350 XT (3M ESPE, USA) demonstrated higher shear bond strength values when compared to Constic (DMG, Germany) and Axo Uni Flow (AXIMACK, India). A significant difference was found between these materials. However, the shear bond strength of the two SAFCs tested did not differ significantly.

Conclusion: The investigation's findings suggest that the SAFCs exhibited inferior shear bond strength compared with CFCs when bonded with permanent dentin.

自粘复合材料与传统可流动复合材料的剪切粘接强度:体外研究
目的:自粘可流动复合材料(SAFCs)作为一种新兴但尚未充分开发的牙科创新材料,代表了牙科材料技术的一个有前途和持久的进步。本研究旨在评估两种SAFCs的剪切结合强度以及常规流动复合材料(CFC)与恒牙本质的结合强度。材料与方法:将36颗牙嵌于丙烯酸块中,移除第三牙合,露出下牙本质。在处理后的牙本质表面放置一个圆柱形模具,并填充待评估的复合树脂材料。将制备好的恒牙本质表面根据以下应用方案随机分为三组:第一组:Axo Uni Flow (AXIMACK, India);第二组:康斯蒂克(德国DMG);第3组:37%磷酸腐蚀剂+ Single Bond Universal + Filtek Z350 XT (3M ESPE, USA)。采用万能试验机对制备的试件进行剪切粘结强度测试。采用Kruskal-Wallis单因素方差分析和Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner两两比较对数据进行分析。结果:与Constic (DMG,德国)和Axo Uni Flow (AXIMACK,印度)相比,Filtek Z350 XT (3M ESPE,美国)具有更高的剪切强度值。在这些材料之间发现了显著的差异。然而,两种测试的SAFCs的剪切粘结强度没有显著差异。结论:SAFCs与恒牙本质的剪切结合强度低于CFCs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: It is a journal aimed for research, scientific facts and details covering all specialties of dentistry with a good determination for exploring and sharing the knowledge in the medical and dental fraternity. The scope is therefore huge covering almost all streams of dentistry - starting from original studies, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, very unique case reports. Journal scope is not limited to these subjects and is more wider covering all specialities of dentistry follows: -Preventive and Community dentistry (Dental public health)- Endodontics- Oral and maxillofacial pathology- Oral and maxillofacial radiology- Oral and maxillofacial surgery (also called oral surgery)- Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics- Periodontology (also called periodontics)- Pediatric dentistry (also called pedodontics)- Prosthodontics (also called prosthetic dentistry)- Oral medicine- Special needs dentistry (also called special care dentistry)- Oral Biology- Forensic odontology- Geriatric dentistry or Geriodontics- Preventive and Social Medicine (Public health)- Our journal appreciates research articles pertaining with advancement of dentistry, preventive and community dentistry including oral epidemiology, oral health services research, oral health education and promotion, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, dental jurisprudence, ethics and oral health, economics, and quality assessment, recent advances in preventive dentistry and community dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信