Helping you helps me: Beneficial effects of regulating others' emotions on well-being and physiological stress.

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Emotion Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1037/emo0001446
Olivia Jurkiewicz, Christopher Oveis
{"title":"Helping you helps me: Beneficial effects of regulating others' emotions on well-being and physiological stress.","authors":"Olivia Jurkiewicz, Christopher Oveis","doi":"10.1037/emo0001446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Improving others' emotions is cognitively and emotionally demanding, potentially increasing stress levels and decreasing well-being. However, the opposite could also occur: Attempts at improving others' emotions-that is, <i>affect-improving</i> extrinsic interpersonal emotion regulation-could enhance regulators' affective well-being and shield against physiological stress because we theorize that engaging in regulatory action to improve others' emotions can strengthen relationships, activate self-regulation, and elicit prosocial reward. In two studies, we test the consequences on regulators when they help others regulate their emotions. In Study 1, a 7-day diary study (<i>N</i> = 205, 1,434 observations) of significant social interactions, regulators who reported they improved the emotions of others to a greater extent experienced more emotions, both positive and negative, during their interactions. They also experienced an increase in positive affect from pre- to post-diary, no change in negative affect, and better affective well-being at the end of the study. In Study 2, a within-subject observational laboratory study (<i>N</i> = 94, 47 dyads, 235 observations), we found that during the minutes when regulators displayed greater behaviorally coded attempts at improving targets' emotions, regulators also experienced a corresponding buffering of increased physiological stress measured by pre-ejection period reactivity. These findings empirically support the role of <i>improving others' emotions</i> in affective well-being over time and the protection against physiological stress when encountering others' negative emotions. This work also contributes a theoretical framework for understanding why regulating others' emotions is important for well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"372-386"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001446","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving others' emotions is cognitively and emotionally demanding, potentially increasing stress levels and decreasing well-being. However, the opposite could also occur: Attempts at improving others' emotions-that is, affect-improving extrinsic interpersonal emotion regulation-could enhance regulators' affective well-being and shield against physiological stress because we theorize that engaging in regulatory action to improve others' emotions can strengthen relationships, activate self-regulation, and elicit prosocial reward. In two studies, we test the consequences on regulators when they help others regulate their emotions. In Study 1, a 7-day diary study (N = 205, 1,434 observations) of significant social interactions, regulators who reported they improved the emotions of others to a greater extent experienced more emotions, both positive and negative, during their interactions. They also experienced an increase in positive affect from pre- to post-diary, no change in negative affect, and better affective well-being at the end of the study. In Study 2, a within-subject observational laboratory study (N = 94, 47 dyads, 235 observations), we found that during the minutes when regulators displayed greater behaviorally coded attempts at improving targets' emotions, regulators also experienced a corresponding buffering of increased physiological stress measured by pre-ejection period reactivity. These findings empirically support the role of improving others' emotions in affective well-being over time and the protection against physiological stress when encountering others' negative emotions. This work also contributes a theoretical framework for understanding why regulating others' emotions is important for well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

你帮我,我帮你:调节他人情绪对幸福感和生理压力的有益影响。
改善他人的情绪是认知和情感上的要求,可能会增加压力水平,降低幸福感。然而,相反的情况也可能发生:试图改善他人的情绪,即改善外在的人际情绪调节,可以增强调节者的情感幸福感,并抵御生理压力,因为我们的理论认为,参与调节行为来改善他人的情绪可以加强关系,激活自我调节,并引发亲社会奖励。在两项研究中,我们测试了当调控者帮助他人调节情绪时对他们的影响。在研究1中,一项为期7天的重要社会互动日记研究(N = 205,1434项观察)中,报告他们在更大程度上改善他人情绪的监管者在互动中体验到更多的情绪,无论是积极的还是消极的。从写日记前到写日记后,他们的积极情绪有所增加,消极情绪没有变化,在研究结束时,他们的情感幸福感也有所提高。在研究2中,一项受试者内部观察性实验室研究(N = 94,47对,235次观察)中,我们发现,在调节者表现出更大的行为编码尝试以改善目标情绪的几分钟内,调节者也经历了相应的生理压力增加的缓冲,通过预弹射期反应来测量。这些研究结果从经验上支持了随着时间的推移改善他人情绪在情感幸福感中的作用,以及在遇到他人负面情绪时对生理压力的保护。这项工作也为理解为什么调节他人的情绪对幸福很重要提供了一个理论框架。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emotion
Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
325
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Emotion publishes significant contributions to the study of emotion from a wide range of theoretical traditions and research domains. The journal includes articles that advance knowledge and theory about all aspects of emotional processes, including reports of substantial empirical studies, scholarly reviews, and major theoretical articles. Submissions from all domains of emotion research are encouraged, including studies focusing on cultural, social, temperament and personality, cognitive, developmental, health, or biological variables that affect or are affected by emotional functioning. Both laboratory and field studies are appropriate for the journal, as are neuroimaging studies of emotional processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信