A Qualitative Study of Workplace Gossip in the Residency Learning Environment.

Journal of graduate medical education Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-13 DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-24-00153.1
Michael Chaikof, Janet Bodley, Michele Farrugia, Evan Tannenbaum, Bobbie Ann Adair White
{"title":"A Qualitative Study of Workplace Gossip in the Residency Learning Environment.","authors":"Michael Chaikof, Janet Bodley, Michele Farrugia, Evan Tannenbaum, Bobbie Ann Adair White","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00153.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Gossip is a ubiquitous sociocultural phenomenon serving many functions in human interactions, including in workplace and academic settings. Gossip can have profound positive and negative impacts; however, its impact on medical residents and their learning environment is unknown. <b>Objective</b> To understand the function and impact of workplace gossip-from and about colleagues and supervisors-on medical residents' experiences in their learning environment. <b>Methods</b> This exploratory study used principles of constructivist grounded theory. Data were collected from residents in the obstetrics and gynecology and psychiatry programs at a large academic institution via semistructured interviews in 2021. Seven residents were interviewed. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive coding, and themes were identified. <b>Results</b> Thematic analysis revealed perceived positive and negative impacts of gossip. Perceived positive impacts included affirmation and roadmapping. Perceived negative impacts included anxiety/fear and the role of gossip in reinforcing the educational hierarchy. Other themes, which are perceived to have both positive and negative impacts, included the role of gossip in learning and in group status. The identity of the gossiper, audience, and subject of gossip also impacted its effects. Gossip between residents about faculty members was perceived as roadmapping, or an affirming role, whereas gossip involving faculty members created anxiety and reinforced negative aspects of the hierarchy. <b>Conclusions</b> Workplace gossip serves both positive and negative roles within the medical learning environment. It can function as informal debriefing and can also threaten psychological safety. Its impact on residents is affected by the identities of the gossiper, subject, and audience.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"16 6","pages":"684-690"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11641882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00153.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Gossip is a ubiquitous sociocultural phenomenon serving many functions in human interactions, including in workplace and academic settings. Gossip can have profound positive and negative impacts; however, its impact on medical residents and their learning environment is unknown. Objective To understand the function and impact of workplace gossip-from and about colleagues and supervisors-on medical residents' experiences in their learning environment. Methods This exploratory study used principles of constructivist grounded theory. Data were collected from residents in the obstetrics and gynecology and psychiatry programs at a large academic institution via semistructured interviews in 2021. Seven residents were interviewed. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive coding, and themes were identified. Results Thematic analysis revealed perceived positive and negative impacts of gossip. Perceived positive impacts included affirmation and roadmapping. Perceived negative impacts included anxiety/fear and the role of gossip in reinforcing the educational hierarchy. Other themes, which are perceived to have both positive and negative impacts, included the role of gossip in learning and in group status. The identity of the gossiper, audience, and subject of gossip also impacted its effects. Gossip between residents about faculty members was perceived as roadmapping, or an affirming role, whereas gossip involving faculty members created anxiety and reinforced negative aspects of the hierarchy. Conclusions Workplace gossip serves both positive and negative roles within the medical learning environment. It can function as informal debriefing and can also threaten psychological safety. Its impact on residents is affected by the identities of the gossiper, subject, and audience.

驻院学习环境中工作场所流言蜚语的定性研究。
八卦是一种无处不在的社会文化现象,在人际交往中发挥着多种作用,包括在工作场所和学术环境中。八卦可以产生深远的积极和消极影响;然而,其对住院医师及其学习环境的影响尚不清楚。目的了解来自同事和主管的职场八卦对住院医师学习环境体验的作用和影响。方法探索性研究采用建构主义扎根理论。数据是在2021年通过半结构化访谈从一家大型学术机构的妇产科和精神病学项目的住院医师中收集的。7名居民接受了采访。使用归纳编码分析转录本,并确定主题。结果主题分析揭示了八卦的正面和负面影响。感知到的积极影响包括肯定和路径规划。感知到的负面影响包括焦虑/恐惧和八卦在强化教育等级中的作用。其他被认为同时具有积极和消极影响的主题包括八卦在学习和群体地位中的作用。说闲话的人、听众和话题的身份也会影响其效果。居民之间关于教员的八卦被认为是路线图,或者是一种肯定的作用,而涉及教员的八卦则会产生焦虑,并强化等级制度的负面影响。结论职场八卦在医学学习环境中既有积极作用,也有消极作用。它可以起到非正式汇报的作用,也可能威胁到心理安全。它对居民的影响受说闲话者、话题和听众身份的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of graduate medical education
Journal of graduate medical education Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
期刊介绍: - Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信