Recognizing Social Injustice and Epistemic Mistrust in Helping Adolescents with Multiple Needs: The AMBIT (Adaptive Mentalization-Based Integrative Treatment) Approach.

Q4 Psychology
Liz Cracknell, Peter Fuggle, Dickon Bevington
{"title":"Recognizing Social Injustice and Epistemic Mistrust in Helping Adolescents with Multiple Needs: The AMBIT (Adaptive Mentalization-Based Integrative Treatment) Approach.","authors":"Liz Cracknell, Peter Fuggle, Dickon Bevington","doi":"10.1521/pdps.2024.52.4.584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epistemic trust-trust in the relevance and utility of social learning-is central to helping processes between clients and workers in helping services. Yet, due to their experiences, clients may <i>adaptively</i> develop predispositions toward stances of epistemic mistrust or epistemic credulity. From an AMBIT (adaptive mentalization-based integrative treatment) perspective, this article argues that epistemic mistrust and credulity are both <i>caused by</i> social injustice and <i>generate</i> further social injustice. Helping services commonly respond in ways that fail to acknowledge this social injustice and, perversely, deliver further injustice still. Our primary focus is how these issues relate to work with clients, but we argue that they are present in work within AMBIT's other foci, too: in teams, multiagency networks, and learning. We conclude that workers and helping services have a moral duty to recognize and attend to the multiple social injustices associated with epistemic mistrust and credulity.</p>","PeriodicalId":38518,"journal":{"name":"Psychodynamic Psychiatry","volume":"52 4","pages":"584-605"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychodynamic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2024.52.4.584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epistemic trust-trust in the relevance and utility of social learning-is central to helping processes between clients and workers in helping services. Yet, due to their experiences, clients may adaptively develop predispositions toward stances of epistemic mistrust or epistemic credulity. From an AMBIT (adaptive mentalization-based integrative treatment) perspective, this article argues that epistemic mistrust and credulity are both caused by social injustice and generate further social injustice. Helping services commonly respond in ways that fail to acknowledge this social injustice and, perversely, deliver further injustice still. Our primary focus is how these issues relate to work with clients, but we argue that they are present in work within AMBIT's other foci, too: in teams, multiagency networks, and learning. We conclude that workers and helping services have a moral duty to recognize and attend to the multiple social injustices associated with epistemic mistrust and credulity.

在帮助有多重需求的青少年时认识到社会不公正和认识上的不信任:AMBIT(基于心理适应的综合治疗)方法。
认知信任——对社会学习的相关性和效用的信任——是帮助服务中客户和工作者之间的帮助过程的核心。然而,由于他们的经验,客户可能会适应地发展对认知不信任或认知轻信立场的倾向。本文从适应性心理综合治疗(AMBIT)的视角出发,认为认知不信任和轻信都是由社会不公正引起的,并进一步产生社会不公正。帮助服务通常以不承认这种社会不公正的方式作出反应,并且反常地造成进一步的不公正。我们主要关注的是这些问题是如何与客户合作的,但我们认为它们也存在于AMBIT的其他重点工作中:团队、多机构网络和学习。我们的结论是,工作者和帮助服务机构有道德责任认识和关注与认知不信任和轻信相关的多重社会不公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychodynamic Psychiatry
Psychodynamic Psychiatry Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信