Does Practice Make Perfect? The Effects of an Eight-Week Manualized Deliberate Practice Course With Peer Feedback on Patient-Rated Working Alliance in Adults: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Q2 Psychology
Clinical Psychology in Europe Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.32872/cpe.12353
Håkan Lagerberg, James F Boswell, Michael J Constantino, Gerhard Andersson, Per Carlbring
{"title":"Does Practice Make Perfect? The Effects of an Eight-Week Manualized Deliberate Practice Course With Peer Feedback on Patient-Rated Working Alliance in Adults: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Håkan Lagerberg, James F Boswell, Michael J Constantino, Gerhard Andersson, Per Carlbring","doi":"10.32872/cpe.12353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deliberate Practice (DP), which underscores the importance of expert mentorship, personalized learning objectives, feedback, and repetition, has been suggested as a method to enhance the effectiveness of therapists.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study tested the efficacy of an eight-week, structured, group-based online course, enriched with peer feedback, for 37 Cognitive Behavioral Therapists. The goal was to assess whether this intervention could boost the quality of therapist-patient alliances, as compared to a control group. To measure this, therapists had their patients anonymously fill out the Session Alliance Inventory both before and after the course. The trial encompassed 120 patient alliance ratings at baseline and 64 at the post-course measurement. The DP course was comprised of a 75-minute remote video workshop each week for eight weeks, supplemented by related study materials. Each workshop focused on a specific skill, such as responding to client resistance, and included 55 minutes of concentrated role-play activities, providing ample opportunities for repetition and feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using a linear mixed model we did not find an effect on patient alliance ratings. However, we observed a trend (<i>p</i> = .054) indicating that the DP group decreased their alliance ratings (Cohen's <i>d</i> = -0.40), while the control group demonstrated an increase in their scores (<i>d</i> = 0.49).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study did not find support for DP leading to better patient-rated alliance compared to a waitlist control. However, the study had several methodological limitations. Further and more rigorous investigation of the effects of DP on patient outcomes is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"6 3","pages":"e12353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11636740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deliberate Practice (DP), which underscores the importance of expert mentorship, personalized learning objectives, feedback, and repetition, has been suggested as a method to enhance the effectiveness of therapists.

Method: The study tested the efficacy of an eight-week, structured, group-based online course, enriched with peer feedback, for 37 Cognitive Behavioral Therapists. The goal was to assess whether this intervention could boost the quality of therapist-patient alliances, as compared to a control group. To measure this, therapists had their patients anonymously fill out the Session Alliance Inventory both before and after the course. The trial encompassed 120 patient alliance ratings at baseline and 64 at the post-course measurement. The DP course was comprised of a 75-minute remote video workshop each week for eight weeks, supplemented by related study materials. Each workshop focused on a specific skill, such as responding to client resistance, and included 55 minutes of concentrated role-play activities, providing ample opportunities for repetition and feedback.

Results: Using a linear mixed model we did not find an effect on patient alliance ratings. However, we observed a trend (p = .054) indicating that the DP group decreased their alliance ratings (Cohen's d = -0.40), while the control group demonstrated an increase in their scores (d = 0.49).

Conclusion: This pilot study did not find support for DP leading to better patient-rated alliance compared to a waitlist control. However, the study had several methodological limitations. Further and more rigorous investigation of the effects of DP on patient outcomes is recommended.

熟能生巧吗?伴同伴反馈的八周手工刻意练习课程对成人患者评价工作联盟的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:刻意练习(DP)强调专家指导、个性化学习目标、反馈和重复的重要性,被认为是提高治疗师有效性的一种方法。方法:该研究对37名认知行为治疗师进行了为期八周的、结构化的、以小组为基础的在线课程的有效性测试,该课程丰富了同伴的反馈。目的是评估与对照组相比,这种干预是否能提高治疗师-患者联盟的质量。为了测量这一点,治疗师让他们的病人在课程前后匿名填写了会话联盟清单。该试验包括基线时120例患者联盟评分和疗程后测量时64例患者联盟评分。DP课程包括每周75分钟的远程视频讲习班,为期8周,并辅以相关的学习材料。每个工作坊都专注于一项特定的技能,比如应对客户的阻力,并包括55分钟的集中角色扮演活动,为重复和反馈提供了充足的机会。结果:使用线性混合模型,我们没有发现对患者联盟评分的影响。然而,我们观察到一个趋势(p = 0.054),表明DP组降低了他们的联盟评级(Cohen's d = -0.40),而对照组的得分则增加了(d = 0.49)。结论:与等候名单对照相比,这项初步研究没有发现支持DP导致更好的患者评价联盟。然而,该研究在方法上存在一些局限性。建议对DP对患者预后的影响进行进一步和更严格的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Clinical Psychology in Europe Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信