The impact of Mayo Adhesion probability score on the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for kidney stones.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ufuk Caglar, Ahmet Halis, Huseyin Burak Yazili, Ali Ayranci, Omer Sarilar, Faruk Ozgor
{"title":"The impact of Mayo Adhesion probability score on the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for kidney stones.","authors":"Ufuk Caglar, Ahmet Halis, Huseyin Burak Yazili, Ali Ayranci, Omer Sarilar, Faruk Ozgor","doi":"10.1007/s00240-024-01680-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urolithiasis is a prevalent condition in urology, with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) serving as a common treatment for kidney stones under 2 cm. The Mayo Adhesion Probability (MAP) score, calculated from perinephric fat characteristics, is traditionally used to assess surgical outcomes but has not been explored in the context of ESWL. This study aims to evaluate the effect of MAP score on the success rate of ESWL. This retrospective study included patients who underwent ESWL for kidney stones between January 2018 and June 2024 at a tertiary care center. Demographic data, stone characteristics, and MAP scores were obtained through CT imaging. ESWL success was defined as either complete stone clearance or a residual fragment less than 4 mm at three months post-procedure. Logistic regression and ROC analysis were employed to identify predictors of treatment success and to determine the optimal MAP score cutoff. A total of 260 patients were analyzed, divided into two groups: MAP score < 3 (n = 154) and MAP score ≥ 3 (n = 106). Patients with a MAP score ≥ 3 had a significantly lower ESWL success rate (49.1%) compared to those with a MAP score < 3 (71.4%; p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified MAP score, BMI, and stone size as significant predictors of ESWL success. ROC analysis established a MAP score cutoff of 2, with 76.5% sensitivity and 64.3% specificity. The MAP score is an independent predictor of ESWL success in kidney stone treatment. Preoperative MAP evaluation may improve patient selection and optimize ESWL outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01680-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urolithiasis is a prevalent condition in urology, with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) serving as a common treatment for kidney stones under 2 cm. The Mayo Adhesion Probability (MAP) score, calculated from perinephric fat characteristics, is traditionally used to assess surgical outcomes but has not been explored in the context of ESWL. This study aims to evaluate the effect of MAP score on the success rate of ESWL. This retrospective study included patients who underwent ESWL for kidney stones between January 2018 and June 2024 at a tertiary care center. Demographic data, stone characteristics, and MAP scores were obtained through CT imaging. ESWL success was defined as either complete stone clearance or a residual fragment less than 4 mm at three months post-procedure. Logistic regression and ROC analysis were employed to identify predictors of treatment success and to determine the optimal MAP score cutoff. A total of 260 patients were analyzed, divided into two groups: MAP score < 3 (n = 154) and MAP score ≥ 3 (n = 106). Patients with a MAP score ≥ 3 had a significantly lower ESWL success rate (49.1%) compared to those with a MAP score < 3 (71.4%; p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified MAP score, BMI, and stone size as significant predictors of ESWL success. ROC analysis established a MAP score cutoff of 2, with 76.5% sensitivity and 64.3% specificity. The MAP score is an independent predictor of ESWL success in kidney stone treatment. Preoperative MAP evaluation may improve patient selection and optimize ESWL outcomes.

梅奥粘连概率评分对体外冲击波碎石治疗肾结石成功的影响。
尿石症是泌尿科的常见病,体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)是治疗2厘米以下肾结石的常用方法。Mayo粘连概率(MAP)评分是根据肾周脂肪特征计算的,传统上用于评估手术结果,但尚未在ESWL中进行探讨。本研究旨在探讨MAP评分对ESWL成功率的影响。这项回顾性研究包括2018年1月至2024年6月在三级保健中心接受ESWL治疗肾结石的患者。通过CT成像获得人口统计学资料、结石特征和MAP评分。ESWL的成功定义为手术后3个月结石完全清除或残留碎片小于4毫米。采用Logistic回归和ROC分析来确定治疗成功的预测因素,并确定最佳MAP评分截止值。共对260例患者进行分析,分为两组:MAP评分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信